1 / 12

Holistic and Community-oriented Defender Evaluation Project Project Advisory Committee Meeting July 25, 2003

Holistic and Community-oriented Defender Evaluation Project Project Advisory Committee Meeting July 25, 2003. Advisory Committee Meeting. Responsibilities Open discussion (careful listening) Perspectives and “roles” Approval of mission and objectives

delilah
Download Presentation

Holistic and Community-oriented Defender Evaluation Project Project Advisory Committee Meeting July 25, 2003

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Holistic and Community-oriented Defender Evaluation Project Project Advisory Committee Meeting July 25, 2003

  2. Advisory Committee Meeting • Responsibilities • Open discussion (careful listening) • Perspectives and “roles” • Approval of mission and objectives • Support of pilot site selection & evaluation protocol • Ongoing support through conversations and listserv exchanges

  3. Project Mission/Measures • Mission: To develop the capacity to evaluate, monitor and promote effective community-based, problem-solving indigent defense systems. • Year 1: Test site for development of assessment methodology, initial protocol • Year 2: Validation, refinement of indicators and assessment tools (incl. self-assessment)

  4. Research Hypotheses: • Community-oriented defense services that address a breadth of client problems: • Produce better life outcomes • Prevent recidivism and • Reduce crime and enhance public safety • In a cost-effective fashion • Anecdotes demand data-supported evidence

  5. Project Timeline • July 25, 2003: Advisory Committee develops guidelines for site selection criteria • August 1, 2003: Issue mini RFP • September 15, 2003: Deadline for responses • October 1, 2003: WG selects pilot site • October 2003: Initial visit, initiation of on-site work • November 12, 2003: Presentation at NLADA Annual Conference • July 1, 2004: Report on year 1 achievements

  6. Breakout Group Objectives • Brainstorm “raw material” for the mini-RFP • Checklists of elements for three criteria of HCOD programs (supports mini-RFP definitions and pilot program selection)

  7. Mini-RFP Criteria(Breakout Group Subjects) • “Holistic” and problem-solving approaches to client representation • Community-based organizations, community stakeholders and relationships • Community-oriented, client-oriented, policy advocacy

  8. Breakout Group Objectives • “Checklist” for elements of each criterion • Data gathering capacity/potential • Potential performance measures • Opportunities for joint/common indicators

  9. Breakout Groups Using four criteria • Group 1 brainstorms: “Holistic” and problem-solving approaches to client representation • Group 2 brainstorms: Community-based organizations • Group 3 brainstorms: Community-oriented, client-oriented, policy advocacy

  10. Measurement Lexicon • Outcome (or Result): “External” conditions that reflect the impact of organizational activities. Usually, the consequences of organizational activity • Indicator: A means by which a condition is expressed • Measure: A quantitative indicator • Performance Measure: A quantitative process, output or outcomes indicator

  11. Brainstorming rules • Everyone participates • All ideas are “good” • All ideas are recorded • Quantity first • Go until exhausted • Simplify, classify, aggregate last

  12. Brainstorming roles • Facilitator • Recorder/Reporter • Participants

More Related