1 / 23

Client objectives

Client objectives. MFIN5600 Institutional wealth management. A brief history: 1998-2013. NASDAQ S&P 500. 4. Types of Pension plans: history . Defined benefit (DB) plan History: American Express in 1928 in the US

delano
Download Presentation

Client objectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Client objectives MFIN5600 Institutional wealth management

  2. A brief history: 1998-2013 NASDAQ S&P 500 4

  3. Types of Pension plans: history • Defined benefit (DB) plan • History: American Express in 1928 in the US • Plan defines the amount of benefits in the future. Amount is a function of average earnings in the last 3-5 years and years of service • Plan sponsors (i.e., employers/governments) invest the reserve fund on behalf of the plan members • Defined contribution (DC) plan • Plan defines only the amount of contribution today • Plan members have individual accounts, and pick investment options. Benefits will depend on investment returns • Chile government – early adopter (1981); choose 5 funds from 6 providers • Both plan sponsors and plan members contribute to the plans (both DB and DC)

  4. DB/DC split (Towers Watson Global Pension Asset Study 2013)

  5. Motivations for dc plans • Changing demographics • DB plans are also known as “pay-as-you-go” plans • Young workers contribute to the plan to fund the retirement of older workers • Risk to employers (plan sponsors) • Burden of the obligation; impact on operating budget in the event of a deficit • DC plans confer no future liability to the plan sponsor • Recent example of shift: Chrysler and General Motor • Freeze DB plan and shift assets to DC accounts

  6. DB plans • Common misconception: “Plan sponsors bear investment risk in DB plans; plan members bear investment risk in DC plans” • DB plan members bear risk of early plan termination due to bankruptcy of plan sponsor • In contrast, in a DC plan, members own their accounts • Largest Canadian DB plans • CPP • Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec • Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTTP/Teachers) • Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) • Hospitals of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP)

  7. DB plan: flow • DB plan assets • Accumulate from annual surpluses (contributions + investment income > payouts + expenses) • From OTPP’s 2012 Annual Report” • CPPIB expects contributions > benefits until 2021

  8. DB Plans: objectives and constraints • Return objectives: achieve inflation-adjusted returns that adequately fund its pension liabilities • PV of liabilities is discounted at the 10-year corporate yield (AAA ~ 3.4% in July 2013) • Low interest rate environment bad for pension plans: higher PV of liabilities, and lower investment income • Constraints • Liquidity – difference between inflow and outflow (see previous slide) • Time horizon – long for continuing plan, but average age of workforce is a consideration • Legal and regulatory – e.g., Ontario: Pension Benefits Act • Others – sponsor’s financial status and specific investment prohibitions

  9. DB plans: risk tolerance • Risk tolerance categories: • Below average, average, above average • Governed by multiple factors: • Financial health of the plan (i.e. surplus/deficit) • Sponsor financial status and profitability (sponsor’s ability to make additional contributions in the event of a shortfall) • Sponsor and pension fund common risk exposure (correlation between sponsor’s operating results and fund’s returns) • Plan features (e.g., early retirement provisions or lump sum options reduce plan’s risk tolerance) • Workforce characteristics (e.g., average age, ratio of active to retired employees)

  10. DB plan: risk management • Investment risk • Includes: equity market risk, credit risk, counterparty risk, liquidity risk • Primary purpose of plan’s assets is to fund future liabilities • Funding ratio – net asset value / PV of liabilities • Asset-liability management (ALM) • Most plans were asset-focus until ~ 5-10 years ago • Divide assets into 2 groups: • Liability matching or hedging: income generation for payouts (to supplement contribution); align interest-rate sensitivity on both sides using a portfolio of bonds and swaps • Return seeking: for capital gains to increase the size of the plan’s assets

  11. Db plan: risk management • Plan can set risk objective relative to the volatility of its surplus/deficit (asset – liabilities) • E.g. volatility ≤ 6% • Risk can also be expressed as a shortfall relative to a specific funding ratio • E.g. if target funding ratio = 100%, then no less than 95% in any given fiscal year • Note: a company’s pension surplus/deficit is now more transparent on corporate balance sheets because of new mark-to-market accounting rules

  12. Db plans: risk management • CPPIB - in addition to investment risk, • Operational risk: internal process and management with the fund • Reputation risk: loss of credibility, affecting public image • Strategic risk: failure to implement a strategy, or make inappropriate choice • Legislative and regulatory risk: non-compliance, loss due to changes to regulation

  13. Dc plans: IPS • Even though plan members make their own investment choices, sponsors are still required to provide an IPS • Sponsor is responsible for the menu of plan options, such as the choice of investment managers (mutual fund companies, type of funds) • Should limit plan members’ investment in company stocks • Sponsor has fiduciary duty to make sure plan members are able to meet their individual objectives, via the menu of options in the DC plan • Each plan member is responsible for defining his/her own objectives and constraints

  14. Hybrid pension plans • Most seek to combine the best of both worlds: • DC plans - potentially better benefits than DB formula via higher investment returns • DB plans – ability to link retirement income to previous salary and awards length of service • Plan sponsor makes investment decisions. Use DB component as a minimum guarantee; plan members receive a top-up if investment returns had been favourable

  15. Types of foundations • Independent (private or family) • Company sponsored • Operating • Community

  16. Types of foundations: independent • Independent (private or family) • Makes grants to aid social, educational, charitable or religious activities • Funds provided by individual or family • Decision making authority lies with donor, family member or independent trustees • Must spend at least 5% of 12-month average asset value, plus expenses to maintain status • Example: The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation

  17. Types of foundations: company • Company sponsored • Legally independent, but with close ties to sponsoring company • Funds provided via annual contributions by a for-profit company • Decision-making authority lies with board of trustees, usually controlled by company executives • Must spend at least 5% of average assets, plus expenses to maintain status • Example: HBC Foundation

  18. Types of foundations: operating • Operating Foundation • Uses resources to conduct research or provide service (such as running a museum or hospital) • Funds provided by individuals, families, or private sector • Decisions made by an independent board of trustees • Must spend 85% of investment income on operational activities every year. Some also must spend at least 3.3% of average assets per year to maintain status • Example: Heart and Stroke Foundation

  19. Types of foundations: community • Community Foundation • Public charities making grants for social services, environmental, health, educational, or religious purposes • Raise money from the general public • Decisions made by Board of Directors • In Canada, we also have an organization called the Community Foundations of Canada • Not subject to minimum annual spending requirement • Example: Hamilton Community Foundation

  20. Foundations: constraints • Liquidity needed to provide for spending levels • Time horizon = perpetuity • Legal and Regulatory – must comply with UMIFA or non-US equivalent • Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act (UMIFA): law governing how much of a foundation or a charity can spend, for what purpose, and how the charity should invest the foundation funds

  21. Endowment funds • Some foundations are established with an initial donation • Endowment funds continue to fundraise every year • Foundations have minimum spending requirements. Endowments do not • Endowment spending is for the sponsor organization only. Foundations tend to support a variety of institutions and initiatives • Investment objectives and constraints, however, are fairly similar

  22. Endowment fund Example: Harvard • AUM (June 30, 2012): $30.7 billion ($36.9 billion pre-crisis) • Largest endowment in the U.S. • Managed by Harvard Management Co. • Funds about 1/3 of the University’s operating budget • Asset allocation: Advocates the so-called “Endowment Model” (popularized by David Swenson of the Yale Endowment Fund) that de-emphasizes traditional stocks and bonds, early adoption of alternative assets

  23. Endowment fund example: harvard • Performance

More Related