1 / 12

GPS Project Dr. Glen Lightsey

GPS Project Dr. Glen Lightsey. Investigation of How Accuracy of GPS Measurements is Affected by Errors in the Navigation Data. General Error Sources. Space Segment Satellite clock stability Predictability of satellite perturbations Control Segment Ephemeris prediction error

deion
Download Presentation

GPS Project Dr. Glen Lightsey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GPS ProjectDr. Glen Lightsey Investigation of How Accuracy of GPS Measurements is Affected by Errors in the Navigation Data

  2. General Error Sources • Space Segment • Satellite clock stability • Predictability of satellite perturbations • Control Segment • Ephemeris prediction error • Thruster performance • User Segment • Atmospheric delay (ionospheric, tropospheric) • Multipath

  3. Project Error Source • Project error from control segment • Input error into navigation message • Diverge IODE/IODC • Four different runs • Single satellite/all satellites • Data collected

  4. Analysis Performed • Used Matlab script to generate: • X, Y, Z residuals • X, Y, Z mean and standard deviations • PDOP • The following plots show the results

  5. Run 1

  6. Run 2

  7. Run 3

  8. Run 4

  9. Run 1 and Run 2

  10. Run 3 and Run 4

  11. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 XStandard Deviation 2.839260665295466 4.272239014080701 4.406938111010710 3.210611943544223 X Mean Deviation -1.810899195591854 2.238524831074054 1.452102527436283 2.196910571407352 YStandard Deviation 2.081125597206021 2.951748558515313 2.749183333205866 3.271725145171435 Y Mean Deviation 2.109895809803447 1.272517605795222 1.813049299283367 1.244333143827680 ZStandard Deviation 1.535638959253165 1.168424213523795 1.124988085860343 1.363715962099733 Z Mean Deviation -2.532220018706219 8.770300506681473 -4.110255008356439 6.321518295255373 Mean and Standard Deviations for all runs

  12. Conclusions • In general, run 2 was noisier than most • Run 4 was less noisy than either 2 or 3 • Runs 2,3,and 4 were noisier than 1 • Runs 2 and 3 were not very different • The accuracy was degraded by approximately 2 to 5 meters

More Related