1 / 28

A governance approach in Latin America

A governance approach in Latin America. Ana Bellver and Nick Manning Public Sector and Governance Group Latin America February, 2008. 1. LAC has a distinctive governance environment. Low spend, low engagement, low trust

declan
Download Presentation

A governance approach in Latin America

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A governance approach in Latin America Ana Bellver and Nick Manning Public Sector and Governance Group Latin America February, 2008

  2. 1. LAC has a distinctive governance environment • Low spend, low engagement, low trust • Citizens and firms avoid contact with the state and have little trust in its competence • Governments find it difficult to raise revenues • Corruption is not a separate public concern: • Inefficiency in public service delivery and regressive spending policies are perceived to be equally important outcomes of poor governance.

  3. With rather less trust… Trust in Government in Latin American and Europe (2003-2005) Source: Latinobarómetro, 2003-2005; Eurobarometer 62, (2005).

  4. From businesses as well Firms’ assessment of the neutrality/composition of Latin America government decisions/spending (Average 2004-2006) Source: (World Economic Forum: 2004-2006)

  5. Low Tax Revenues Revenues as a Percentage of GDP (2004) Source: (OECD: 2008)

  6. And distinctively low expenditures Average General Government Expenditure as Percent of GDP per Income Group and Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) region Source: International Monetary Fund, Government Financial Statistics (2008).

  7. Reasons for public skepticism… Inequality in Latin America and Europe before and after taxes and transfers (Gini Coefficients) Source: (OECD: 2008)

  8. And for distrust in government… Distribution of Social Spending across Income Levels: Average of Selected Countries in Latin America Note: Data are the simple average of nine countries: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico and Uruguay. Source: (OECD: 2008) drawing on (ECLAC: 2005)

  9. As evidenced by disengagement from services… Deficits and surpluses in mean years of schooling compared to levels predicted by per capita GDP Source: (Ferranti and Ody: 2005)

  10. and disengagement from the formal economy Estimates of the Shadow Economy in Latin America (in % of official GDP) OECD average Source: (Schneider: September 2006)

  11. 2. The challenge for the Bank in LAC • Bank must prove itself, particularly challenging since GAC is an area in which there is little certainty or best practice • Some real successes in the region on macro and fiduciary issues • Persistent failures in improving the merit-basis/due process in the public sector

  12. This requires a distinctively positive LAC approach • Improving public trust in government • Adopting discrete, pragmatic and innovative approaches • Building government confidence that the Bank understand their countries’ political constraints

  13. 3. How? • By theme: • Increasing transparency and efficiency in fiscal expenditures and PFM • Enhancing focus on strengthening regulatory frameworks, and capacity and independence of oversight bodies • Enhancing sector governance by focusing on issues of performance and reducing inefficiency in the provision of services • By country type: • Lower Middle Income Countries: • Confidence building at the agency level • Space for confidence building dialogue • Upper Middle Income Countries: • Building confidence in sectors and in watchdog bodies

  14. Theme 1: Working on Transparency & Efficiency • SEPA: system of enhanced transparency in government contracts (Region-wide, with IDB) • OECD procurement benchmarking: Systematic roll-out of programmatic support (Peru, Mexico) • Tax reforms: e.g. Guatemala – (collection rate increased by 3% of GDP over 5 years; taxation superintendence now viewed as one of most trusted institutions in Guatemala) • Local government support: transparency in municipal finances and participatory planning & budgeting (Costa Rica)

  15. Theme 2: Working on Regulatory Frameworks & Oversight Institutions • Supreme Audit Institutions: Systematic support, e.g. Honduras (strengthening capacity for CSO participation in SAI audits); Peru (supporting capacity to oversee the implementation of PPP); regional SAI body OLACEFS (improving capacity to combat corruption) • Assessing competition in the roads sector: Framework approach to help improve sector governance (Bolivia) • Judicial appointment and performance evaluations systems in Colombia, Honduras (resulting in increased judicial independence, higher standards of accountability) • Electricity sector: Database of regulatory characteristics (covering 54 agencies)

  16. Theme 3: Working on Performance & Efficiency in Service Delivery • Monitoring results in education and nutrition: accompanied by extensive media dissemination campaign (Peru RECURSO AAA) • Workshops on investigative journalism • Addressing citizen-state interface: Strengthening the capacity of local councils to monitor and evaluate social policies; setting up user friendly portal to disseminate M&E results (Uruguay) • Systematic governance analyses in key sectors: Developing entry points in education, rural, water (Paraguay) • Strengthening access to information offices in line ministries (Honduras)

  17. Country Group: Lower Middle Income countries • Building confidence at the agency level • Strengthening Accountability in Social Service Delivery in Central America (Laura Rawlings) • primary objective is to provide information on improvements in the efficiency and quality of basic social services • supporting the development of five Sectoral Governance Analyses (Honduras- health, Honduras-education, Guatemala- health, Guatemala-education, El Salvador-education) • "deconstructing" alternative service delivery models to find elements from the alternative models to export to the traditional models to strengthen performance and results

  18. Lower Middle Income countries • Space for confidence-building dialogue (1) • Policy Dialogue and Consensus in El Salvador (Alberto Leyton) • helped the Bank to engage in policy discussions in the country by supporting civic groups and independent analysts - helping them play the role of informed brokers and help bridging positions among political parties on fiscal related issues during the political campaign. • effective - not only in facilitating a broad discussion on sensitive issues in the context of the international financial crisis, but also in helping the Bank to reactivate and reengage in lending activities by partially removing pre-existing political gridlock in Congress. • activity continues until June 2009 - other sensitive topics will also be brought to the public debate during the campaign process in order to build consensus that will help the next administration implement new policies and programs

  19. Lower Middle Income countries • Space for confidence-building dialogue (2) • Honduras: Unblocking governance reforms and stregthening public acccountability (Ana Bellver) • Coalition established between access to information commissioners in Honduras and Mexico and civil society representatives - instrumental in setting up a coalition between these two groups in support of the implementation of the access to information law • Focus on transparency of the budget process in Honduras and regional comparisons, agree on measures to make it more transparent, and facilitate social monitoring of pro-poor spending. • Wworkshops on transparency and accountability at the school level for communities and parent associations and the development of a social monitoring methodology for education budgets.

  20. Country group: Upper Middle Income countries • Building confidence in sectors & in watchdog bodies (1) • Argentina: Social Service Delivery and Federal Fiscal Relationship in Argentina: The case of Buenos Aires (Emily Sinnott) • analysis of social service delivery in Buenos Aires Province to strengthen understanding of the impact of changing fiscal federalism arrangements in Argentina on service delivery in the social sectors and to create a dialogue between main stakeholders (federal and provincial governments, unions, academic experts and civil society) • looked at political economy considerations and key institutional processes that affect public social spending and policy-making in the province of Buenos Aires • DFID resources allowed the Bank to fund a study and comprehensive dialogue on the political economy process that is essential to any understanding of the fiscal accounts of the Province of Buenos Aires.

  21. Upper Middle Income countries • Building confidence in sectors & in watchdog bodies (2) • Installing Basic Mgt.Capacity in Choco, Colombia (Edgardo Mosqueira) • supporting the strengthening of public management systems in Choco – a chronically weak department. • will also contribute to the measures being prepared by the Central Government to improve the delivery of key services in Choco • objective is to build public confidence in the Departamental Government of Choco.

  22. Upper Middle Income countries • Building confidence in sectors & in watchdog bodies(3) • Social Accountability in Public Services in Mexico (Roby Senderowitsch) • supported the creation of a Social Accountability Center at the national level - the main objective of the Center is to build up technical capacities in the NGOs to make them effective in their social accountability role. • NGOs that work on social accountability can now work on different sectors with more rigorous analyses. • The Center has been launched and it was presented in a public event on November 19, 2008.

  23. 4. Working on oversight institutions • The case of Honduras Supreme Audit Institution - Tribunal Superior de Cuentas

  24. The puzzle • Check and balance institutions in fragile institutional environments are usually born with design flaws which makes them vulnerable to political pressure. • As they fulfill their mandate more efficiently, influence from the three branches of government and/or vested interest might jeopardize efforts to strengthen their capacity and independence. • Need to gather support from peers (INTOSAI, OLASEF) and citizens.

  25. The Honduran case • Tribunal Superior de Cuentas was created in 2003 by law as the regulatory body of the National Oversight System. • Headed by a collegial body of three Magistrates (from the three main political parties). • Duration of the term: 5 years, counter cyclical. • The TSC now reviews Government financial statements and submits an annual report to Congress. Coverage of audits is steadily improving but quality remains poor. • Five-year institutional strengthening plan, supported by the Bank, USAID and other external partners, focuses on professionalization of TSC.

  26. Bringing together institutional control and social control: a win- win • Institutional control bodies have the mandate but very often lack the capacity to fulfill that mandate, reach every institution, and follow-up on recommendations. • Social control bodies are on the ground, have in-depth knowledge about the daily management of the institutions but lack capacity and the official mandate to exert control. • With a clear understanding of each ones’ roles and responsibilities they can strengthen each other, and build trust in the SAI.

  27. Audits with social participation- Results of the pilot audits • 8 pilots in different regions: 2 education centers (university and secondary center), 2 regional hospitals, 2 municipalities, and 2 development centers (forest, roads). • Social participation lead to: i) identification of 76% of the internal control deficiencies detected, ii) 97% of civil responsibilities incurred up to $ 1,7 million, and iii) social recognition of the SAI work. • Audit reports were presented publicly, each institution committed to a remedial action plan to be followed up by social monitoring bodies.

  28. 5. In sum The LAC approach to governance has: • Required the Bank to be more adventurous • Helped us look for trust-building opportunities in traditional investment and TA projects • Tested small but posssibly scaleable approaches that might begin to unravel the dysfunctional low spend, low engagement, low trust governance equilibrium in Latin America.

More Related