1 / 8

China Debate Education Network Ethical Considerations and Debate

China Debate Education Network Ethical Considerations and Debate. Debate as an Alternative to Violence. All animals, including human animals, have a variety of ways to resolve differences. Human animals use violent and non-violent means to resolve differences.

dawn
Download Presentation

China Debate Education Network Ethical Considerations and Debate

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. China Debate Education Network Ethical Considerations and Debate

  2. Debate as an Alternative to Violence • All animals, including human animals, have a variety of ways to resolve differences. • Human animals use violent and non-violent means to resolve differences. • Only human animals can use argumentation and debate to resolve differences non-violently. • USA and USSR negotiated about Cuba and Turkey • Six party talks to prevent outbreak of war in Korea • George McGovern & Mark Hatfield argued to end the American war in Vietnam • All things being equal, non-violence is more ethical than violence.

  3. Ethics: Preliminary Considerations • Ethical considerations are separable from matters of effectiveness • Ethics is a matter of individual action as well as social tradition • Ethics operates in the realm of “more or less” rather than on the basis of “yes or no.”

  4. Dimensions of Ethics Relevant to Debate: Four Considerations • First, respect the process of debate • We must respect the process of argument. • We must not attempt to co-opt the debate process by using strategies and tactics antithetical to debate • Debaters agree to an ethic of open and honest use of evidence • Debaters agree not to knowingly use fallacious reasoning even when it is more effective

  5. Dimensions of Ethics Relevant to Debate: Four Considerations • Second, respect those with whom we debate. • Opponents are persons to be respected, not objects to be overcome • Opponents are not our “enemy,” they are partners in search of better ideas. • Ethical debaters do not stoop to personal attacks and name calling.

  6. Dimensions of Ethics Relevant to Debate: Four Considerations • Third, respect the adjudicators of debate. • The adjudicator is there because disagreements could not be resolved internally. • Respecting the adjudicator does not automatically mean that we believe the decision is correct. • Decisions of the adjudicator can be appealed, but only through proper channels. • Ethics demands, at minimum, respect for the adjudicator as a person.

  7. Dimensions of Ethics Relevant to Debate: Four Considerations • Fourth, respect the outcome of the debate. • That we have agreed to the process of debate means that we must respect the entire process and the outcome is a part of that process. • Ethical debaters respect the outcome of the debate even when they disagree with that outcome.

  8. THANKYOU! 谢谢

More Related