96 Views

Download Presentation
##### Allocation of Surplus Based Upon Right Tail Deviation

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

**Allocation of Surplus Based Upon Right Tail Deviation**Bob Bear PXRE Corporation CARE 6/99**Introduction**Expected Policyholder Deficit has become a widely accepted method of assessing adequacy of surplus to support a book of business. It is an understandable way to quantify management’s risk tolerance level.**Surplus Allocation Issues**(1) EPD is not additive for layers (Shaun Wang, “An Actuarial Index of the Right-Rail Risk”, NAAJ, April 1998). Refer to 1998 PCAS paper by Wang. (2) EPD produces counterintuitive results (e.g., EPD is bigger for a Gamma distribution than a Pareto); see 8/98 CARE presentation on “Getting to E in ROE” by Todd Bault.**Concept**• A good risk load procedure is a good candidate for a surplus allocation approach, with different parameterization. • Right Tail Deviation has the desirable properties of a good risk load procedure. Refer to Wang’s papers, and the 10/98 ASTIN paper by Christofides on “Pricing for Risk in Financial Transactions”.**Right Tail Deviation of X with Parameter r, 0<r<=1**• Definition: D(X;r)=Int{S(t)^r -S(t)}, where S(t) is the probability that the variable of interest X exceeds t (1-CDF). The integration is performed over all values of t for which X is defined. • Note that this definition is based on Wang’s original definition of a ph-transform, rather that his Right Tail Deviation definition with r=.5.**Intuitive Explanation**• The integral of S(t) yields the expected value of X. • The integral of S(t)^r yields a risk-adjusted expected value. • D(X;r) is the area between these curves, providing the needed risk load or surplus allocation.**Application**• The variable X of interest is underwriting loss attributable to a portfolio at end of planning horizon or contract expiration, reflecting only funds supplied by underwriting (with interest and taxes). • This is the negative of the underwriting profit definition. Thus, losses are positive and profits are negative. The integration is performed over all real values.**Basic Properties of Right Tail Deviation (RTD)**• Shift and Scale Invariant: D(aX+b;r)=a*D(x;r), as for standard dev. • Subadditivity: D(X+Y;r)<=D(X;r)+D(Y;r) as for standard deviation. • If X and Y are comonotonic (including perfect correlation), then D(X+Y;r) =D(X;r)+D(Y;r); additive for layers, unlike standard deviation and EPD.**Important Properties of RTD**• Preserves stop-loss ordering of risks (second-order stochastic dominance). EPD also has this property, but standard deviation does not. • When r declines from one to zero, the risk loaded loss (or loss plus allocated surplus) increases from the expected loss to the maximum possible loss.**Interesting Properties of RTD**• For a small layer at the right tail, the standard deviation and the Right Tail Deviation with r=.5 converge to each other. D(X;.5)<=SD for a small layer. • Widely used distributions are ordered consistent with relative tail thickness. For a fixed mean and CV, the RTD would rank following from most to least risky: Pareto, Lognormal, Weibull, Gamma.**Layers of Fixed Width**• The risk adjusted loss (or loss plus allocated surplus) declines (doesn’t increase) as the attachment increases. • The risk load (or allocated surplus) increases as a percentage of expected loss as the attachment increases. • More underwriting profit is needed to meet ROE target, as attachment goes up.**Parameterization of RTD**• Use EPD or other management criteria to quantify surplus required to support the portfolio, assuming risk-free interest. • Calculate r for which the RTD equals the required surplus. The variable X is defined to be the underwriting loss attributable to a portfolio at the end of the planning horizon or at contract expiration, with interest and taxes.**Surplus Allocation Proposal**• For each business segment, calculate the reduction in RTD for the portfolio if the particular segment were to be excluded. • Allocate surplus AS(s) to the various segments in proportion to these reductions in RTD. • Calculate RTD(s) for each business segment as a stand-alone portfolio.**Benefit of Diversification**• Calculate Diversification Factor d from AS(s) = d*RTD(s). The difference between AS(s) and RTD(s) reflects the benefit of diversification. • This process can be repeated to allocate surplus to contract within each business segment. In the end, surplus is allocated to a contract by applying a Diversification Factor d to the RTD for the contract.**Return on Equity**• Given allocated surplus at beginning of planning horizon or at contract inception, the surplus at end of horizon or at contract expiration may be calculated. • For a contract, future profits are discounted to contract expiration date. • ROE may be calculated as the average annual percentage change in surplus.**Summary**• RTD has all the desired properties of a risk load procedure. • RTD may also be used for surplus allocation and ROE estimation purposes. • RTD may be parameterized to reflect management’s risk tolerance level.