170 likes | 183 Views
Brno University of Technology osmera @fme.vutbr.cz MUDr. Pavel Ošmera – junior Department of Imaging Methods, Faculty of Medicine of Masaryk University St. Anne's University Hospital Brno osmera @fnusa.cz. FRactal Dimension of Electron. prof. Ing. Pavel Ošmera, CSc.
E N D
Brno University of Technology osmera @fme.vutbr.cz MUDr. PavelOšmera – junior Department of Imaging Methods, Faculty of Medicine of Masaryk University St. Anne's University Hospital Brno osmera @fnusa.cz FRactal Dimension of Electron prof. Ing. PavelOšmera, CSc. June 27-29, 2012 MENDEL 2012
Intoduction We would like to find a better and plausible structure of the electron as a torus and fractal structure. However it is in contradiction with generally accepted knowledge, where the electron has not a structure.Actual properties of the electron cannot be explained by point-like models. This paper is an attempt to improve our previous calculations of the radius of the electron and its fractal dimension. The vortex-fractal theory could possibly help with explanation what the charge, the electron, the proton, the electromagnetic field, etc. actually are.
Main ideas and differences MENDEL2010
a)spiral structure as thefractal-spiral structure b) fractal-ring structure Fractalsseem to be very powerful in describing natural objects on all scales. Fractal dimension and fractal measure, are crucial parameters for such description.
a) b) c) Vortex structures: a) the vortexVB at the drain hole of bath-tub, b) the vortextornado-vortexVT c) the vortex in the PET bottle
The fractal ring structure of the electron MENDEL2010
The spin of the electron MENDEL2012 MENDEL2010 Vortex structures with spin 1/2
The fractal ring structure of the electron MENDEL2007
. MENDEL2012
Fractal dimension of the electron where N is number of substructures (number of new sticks), ε =1/S is scaling factor,N1 = N2 = 42
The spin of the electron MENDEL2012
r1= 0.7223517245ro ~ 0.382Å, r2= 1.792517214ro ~ 0.948Å the couple constant α
proton electron Structure the of the neutron
Conclusions Fractals seem to be very powerful in describing natural objects on all scales. To understand the electromagnetic field requires a high degree of imagination. The degree of imagination that is required is much more extreme than that required for some of the ancient ideas. The modern ideas are much harder to imagine. We use mathematical equations and rules, and make a lot of pictures. We can’t allow ourselves to seriously imagine things, which are obviously in contradiction to the known laws of nature. And so our kind of imagination is quite a difficult game (or a puzzle). One has to have the imagination to think of something that has never seen before, never been heard before. At the same time the thoughts are restricted or limited by the conditions that come from our knowledge of the way nature really is. The problem of creating something which is new, but which is consistent with everything, which has been seen before, is one of extreme difficulty.Treatingthe electron as a torus structure rather than the point-like particle is a very challenging .physical topic.