1 / 15

Creating a Comprehensive, Curriculum-Based First Year Experience

Creating a Comprehensive, Curriculum-Based First Year Experience. Krista Beron. Where We Began. Two First Year clusters with 50% of FYs Traditional programming model Weekly cluster wide educational program Weekly alternative-to-alcohol weekend socials Year-long

davida
Download Presentation

Creating a Comprehensive, Curriculum-Based First Year Experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Creating a Comprehensive, Curriculum-Based First Year Experience Krista Beron

  2. Where We Began • Two First Year clusters with 50% of FYs • Traditional programming model • Weekly cluster wide educational program • Weekly alternative-to-alcohol weekend socials • Year-long • No academic/campus involvement • Residence Life/First Year Office leadership committee

  3. Program Mission and Goals • Program Mission • Facilitate the transition and adjustment to the Dartmouth community for first-year students; and • Sustain a residential learning community that promotes the social, emotional, moral and physical well-being of its members • Specific goals of the program are as follows: • Stage One • Create the opportunity to develop social networks, particularly those that are not defined by alcohol. • Promote residentially-based interaction for FYRE residents. • Increase student contact with administrators and use of campus resources. • Stage Two • Promote citizenship, service and leadership. • Increase student contact with faculty. • Challenge residents to explore the complexities of diversity.

  4. Limitations of Traditional Program • Lack of attendance • Lack of creativity amongst student staff • Lack of individual contact/outreach • Lack of critical message delivery • Excessive spending with limited results • Lack of campus resource connection

  5. Program Planning Process • Revisit mission and goals • Identify strengths and weaknesses • Take stock of available resources • Develop objectives to meet goals • Put logistics in place to meet objectives • Implement the program • Assess outcomes • Revisit objectives

  6. Identifying Key Resources • Engaged student staff • Campus resources • Small floor communities • Staff focused on relationship building • Involve students in development process

  7. Establishing Objectives • Opportunity to share common experiences • Share enthusiasm for campus traditions • Resource connection • Safe place to ask key questions of transition • Feel known personally • Have a sense of belonging

  8. Theoretical Background • Marginality & Mattering • Rogers • Relationship development necessary part of growth • Four I’s of Learning Communities • Identity • Involvement • Investment • Influence • Strategic Planning Theory • Steps in process followed to organize process of change

  9. Redeveloped Program Structure • Weekly gatherings led by student staff • Topics/curricula outlined by leadership committee • Curricula reviewed by campus resource colleagues • Staff supported by flexible curricula reviewed weekly in staff meetings • Professional ¼ position dedicated to managing & assessing program • Regular cluster wide social programming • Community connection trips • Utilization of staff interaction logs and community sociograms to assess staff success

  10. Preparation for Implementation • Professional staff training • Student staff training • Manual creation • Facilitation guides for staff meetings • Marketing of program to residents • Planning for assessment

  11. Implementation • Use student language • Attention to staff level of comfort • Understand what topics are most important to transition on your campus • Utilize campus resources when helpful

  12. Assessed Results • On average, 85% voluntary participation • On average, 75% learning outcome attainment • Staff felt more supported & more successful • Campus resources partnering voluntarily • Pilot program expanded to entire FY class

  13. Lack of Impact of Potential Obstacles • Increased number of programs could increase budgetary needs • Limited amount & quality of gathering space • Limited amount of academic affairs involvement

  14. Addressed Impact Areas • Student staff selection • Student staff placement • Professional staff training • Student staff training • Intentional partnering with campus resource colleagues • Assessment

  15. Application for Other Campuses • Find pieces that can be applied • Used peer mentoring approach at UMass • Incorporated relationship-building in RA staff • Know your campus culture and exploit it • How does this apply to your campus?

More Related