1 / 31

The International TIGGE Archive

The International TIGGE Archive. Baudouin Raoult, Manuel Fuentes - ECMWF Steven Worley, Doug Schuster - NCAR Xiaofeng Bian, Li Xiang - CMA Many Others!. Background: the TIGGE database. Global ensemble forecasts to around 14 days generated routinely at different centres around the world

darva
Download Presentation

The International TIGGE Archive

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The International TIGGE Archive Baudouin Raoult, Manuel Fuentes - ECMWF Steven Worley, Doug Schuster - NCAR Xiaofeng Bian, Li Xiang - CMA Many Others! 3rd Thorpex Int. Science Symp., May 2009

  2. Background: the TIGGE database Global ensemble forecasts to around 14 days generated routinely at different centres around the world Three archive centres: CMA, NCAR and ECMWF Ten data providers: ECMWF, JMA (Japan), UK Met Office (UK), CMA (China), NCEP (USA), MSC (Canada), Météo-France (France), BOM (Australia), KMA (Korea), CPTEC (Brazil) Data exchanges using UNIDATA LDM, HTTP and FTP 200 TB, growing by > 1 TB/week

  3. Background, Brief Time Line • March 2005, TIGGE Workshop at ECMWF • Collect community input for TIGGE science and data requirements • Choose centralized archives for early start (ECMWF, NCAR, CMA) • September 2005, meeting of technical experts at ECMWF • Representatives from ECMWF, NCAR, CMA, and NAEFS • Create technical implementation plan to address TIGGE needs • November 2005, TIGGE Working Group at ECMWF • Present and get approval for the technical implementation plan • October 2006, first EPS data is delivered • May 2006, User access to TIGGE archive starts • February 2008, all 10 international providers sending EPS data Significant accomplishment, create 24x7 international system in less than three years 3rd Thorpex Int. Science Symp., May 2009

  4. Quality assurance: homogeneity Homogeneity is paramount for TIGGE to succeed The more consistent the archive the easier it will be to develop applications There are three aspects to homogeneity: Common terminology (parameter names, file names,…) Common data format (format, units, …) Definition of an agreed list of products (Parameters, Steps, levels, …) What is not homogeneous: Resolution Base time (although most provider have a run at 12 UTC) Forecast length Number of ensemble

  5. Strong governance Precise definition of: Which products: list of parameters, levels, steps, units,… Which format: GRIB2 Which transport protocol: UNIDATA’s LDM Which naming convention: WMO file name convention Only exception: the grid and resolution Choice of the data provider. Data provider to provide interpolation to regular lat/lon Best possible model output Many tools and examples: Sample dataset available Various GRIB2 tools, “tigge_check” validator, … Scripts that implement exchange protocol Web site with documentation, sample data set, tools, news….

  6. QA: Checking for homogeneity E.g. Cloud-cover: instantaneous or six hourly?

  7. Completeness The objective is to have 100% complete datasets at the Archive Centres Completeness may not be achieved for two reasons: The transfer of the data to the Archive Centre fails Operational activities at a data provider are interrupted and back filling past runs is impractical Incomplete datasets are often very difficult to use Most of the current tools used for ensemble forecasts assume a fixed number of members from day to day

  8. QA: Checking completeness

  9. Archive Status and Monitoring, Variability between providers

  10. Archive Status and Monitoring, Archive Completeness PL = Pressure Level, PT = 320K θ Level, PV = ± 2 Potential Vorticity Level, SL = Single/Surface Level

  11. Archive Status and Monitoring, Archive Completeness PL = Pressure Level, PT = 320K θ Level, PV = ± 2 Potential Vorticity Level, SL = Single/Surface Level

  12. Access to TIGGE data Data is available to Research and Education after 48 hours Self registration by agreeing to the terms and conditions Portals at CMA, NCAR and ECMWF

  13. User Data Access and Support @ ECMWF TIGGE web site Documentation Model changes ECMWF portal offers: Access to offline data Aggregation along any axis (date, level, parameter, origin, ensemble, …) Provision of multi-model data on a single grid (regridding to any lat/lon grid) Sub-area selection Reduces volumes to be downloaded by many order of magnitude

  14. TIGGE @ ECMWF

  15. TIGGE portal at ECMWF (using Ajax)

  16. TIGGE Portal: grid selection

  17. TIGGE Portal: area selection

  18. TIGGE @ ECMWF

  19. TIGGE @ ECMWF: Scheduling users’ requests Monitoring Per user limits Global limits

  20. TIGGE @ ECMWF Batch access

  21. TIGGE@ECMWF: direct access to offline data (MARS)

  22. User Data Access and Support, differences @ NCAR • User data selection and subsetting equivalent to ECMWF • 2.5 Weeks of Data Online • Archive organized in file groups by provider and forecast initialization time • Pressure Level, Θ Level, PV Level, Single/Surface Level • Multiple file download option • Direct through browser, using prepared ‘wget’ script • Long-term file groups available by request 3rd Thorpex Int. Science Symp., May 2009

  23. User Data Access and Support, differences @ NCAR • Subset data format in GRIB2 or netCDF • Online queue to monitor subset data processing progress • Subsetting completion email notification for users • TIGGE Research Support • Library listing of software tools for data access and analysis • TIGGE Users Group web forum • Community web space to share questions and findings • Provided by Unidata • Archive of Tropical Cyclone (cxml) data for participating providers • Updated 6-hourly 3rd Thorpex Int. Science Symp., May 2009

  24. User Data Access and Support, differences @ CMA • Collaborated with ECMWF and CNIC • Grid Middleware • Accessing the distributed TIGGE data based on Grid middleware (GRIA, GOS) technologies • Production Generation • Selecting the product and associated parameters based on the product catalogue • Available product in ensemble mean • Request Monitoring and Query • Access Control 3rd Thorpex Int. Science Symp., May 2009

  25. User Data Access and Support, differences @ CMA Data Retreival Data Selection Selecting different data attributes, such as origin centre, date, base time, forecast time step, forecast type, level type, level and parameter. The different data options will be updated dynamically based on the user selection and on the constraints described in the data catalogue. Submit data request The total number of data fields to be retrieved. If the number of requested fields is larger than the allowed limit, the portal will suggest the users to split their data retrieval. Custom result products area selection grid conversion Plotting Browse and download result products

  26. User Data Access and Support, differences @ CMA Production Generation product selection Selecting the product and associated parameters based on the product catalogue Submit product generation request Available product in ensemble mean Request Monitoring and Query Check the real-time updates of the information about requests Access the detailed monitoring information of requests for a period of time, including request creation time, request finish time, process status, request condition, detailed processing information and result download. Query monitoring information according to the request date, request user id, request type and result status. Access Control Four kinds of members Different member has different role

  27. User Metrics at ECMWF

  28. User Metrics at ECMWF : User Metrics at ECMWF

  29. User Metrics at ECMWF : Data volumes

  30. Introduction to Poster Session demonstrations • Poster Sessions Demonstrations • When • Tuesday, 15:00-16:30 (immediately following presentation) • Wednesday, 16:30-18:00 • Any time by appointment, please ask representatives for assistance • (Raoult, Worley, Bian, Schuster, Fuentes, other person from CMA?) • Purposes • Illustrate all features of the portals • Register users • Submit data requests • Demonstrate analysis tools 3rd Thorpex Int. Science Symp., May 2009

  31. Credits Alex de Almeida Fernandes, Baudouin Raoult, Beth Ebert, Bian Xiaofeng, Dan Swank, Dave Stepaniak, David Ian Brown, Don Middleton, Dong-Joon Kim, Doug Schuster, Glenn Rutledge, Hannah Wilcox, Jean Nicolau, Jim Fraser, Joerg Urban, Julio Pablo Reyes Fernandez, Justin Cooke, Lang Hongliang, Lewis Poulin, Li Xiang, Ma Qiang, Manuel Fuentes, Michel Grenier, Okki Lee, Richard Dare, Richard Swinbank, Shintaro Yokoi, Simon Thompson, Steve Emmerson, Steve Worley, Steven Anthony, Tan Le, Tian Hao, Tom Yoksas, Waldenio Almeida, Yang Xin, Young-Youn Park, Yves Pelletier, … ... and many more

More Related