1 / 13

CESP Community Energy Saving Programme

CESP Community Energy Saving Programme. energy made better. CESP - Background. Rising energy prices Increase in fuel poverty CERT mainly funding insulation and lighting Calls for a windfall tax on energy companies Energy suppliers already funding £3bn CERT activity

dareh
Download Presentation

CESP Community Energy Saving Programme

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CESP Community Energy Saving Programme energy made better

  2. CESP - Background • Rising energy prices • Increase in fuel poverty • CERT mainly funding insulation and lighting • Calls for a windfall tax on energy companies • Energy suppliers already funding £3bn CERT activity • No targets on generators

  3. CESP Summary • Announced by Gordon Brown in Sept 2008 • Part of Governments “Home Energy Saving Programme” • Two key aims; • Improve energy efficiency of existing housing stock • Reduce energy demand in the domestic sector • To be achieved by; • Community approach – working in partnership • ‘whole-house’ principle – delivering measures • High-impact principle – targeting low-income households • Aim to lift whole communities out of fuel poverty • Funding from Generators for the first time • Consultation document published 12 February 2009

  4. Key Proposals • Partnership approach using LA’s as a key player • Bonuses will be offered as incentives for delivery of multiple measures • Targeting given geographical areas • Households need to be in lowest decile of the Index of Multiple Deprivation’s (IMD) income domain • Around 100 schemes • Benefiting roughly 90,000 households • CESP will run until December 2012

  5. Obligations

  6. How CESP will work • Scoring system • Baseline assessment of the amount of carbon saved per measure • A points increase, or decrease depending on the measure installed • Bonus points for multiple measures installed in one home, and/or treat many homes in one area • Flexibility of delivery of measures • Some measures will receive increased credits others reduced i.e. solid wall will get an uplift but cavity wall insulation a decrease

  7. Proposed measures

  8. Whole-house approach • Focussed on hard-to-treat homes • Offer as many measures as practicable and appropriate • Promote to as many households as possible in targeted area • House by house, street by street approach • Focusing on measures that make significant improvements to energy efficiency and CO2 reductions • Creating incentives for use of more significant measures by scoring more highly i.e. solid wall insulation • Promoting combinations of measures within single homes by providing bonus scores

  9. Example Applying a score in a whole house approach: a practical example A Victorian terraced house in a deprived area of Doncaster has solid stone and brick walls and 50 millimetres of loft insulation. The house loses large amounts of energy through its roof and walls, and has a very inefficient 1980s G-rated boiler, which burns a lot of fuel for the heat it produces. A whole-house approach could provide loft insulation to current building regulation standards, internal solid wall insulation and replace the boiler with an efficient condensing model. The loft insulation would cost approximately £338 offering CO2 savings of around 251kg CO2/year, or around 10 tonnes CO2 over the lifetime of the measure. The score for this measure would be 5 points. The internal wall insulation would cost around £3056 with CO2 savings of roughly 1470kg CO2/year, or around 44 tonnes CO2 over the lifetime of the measure. The points score of this measure would be 132. As this would be the second measure installed within the house, all measures installed in this house would receive a whole house bonus of 10%. Installing a new boiler would cost approximately £2500, the CO2 savings roughly 1979kg CO2/year, or 24 tonnes CO2 over the lifetime of the measure. The points score for this measure would be 24. As this would be the third measure installed within the house all measures would now receive a 20% bonus rather than a 10% bonus. The total cost for introducing loft insulation, internal solid wall insulation and a replacement boiler would be approximately £5894. The total CO2 savings would be around 3700kg CO2/year. The total score for the individual measures would be 161 points. Since all measures would also then get a 20% bonus, the final score of measures in this house would be 193.2 points. The carbon savings and scores would also be modified by Ofgem depending on the size of the property (measures can produce smaller savings in smaller properties).

  10. Selection Criteria/Eligibility • Super Output areas • 1500 people per area/approx 650 households • Use IMD to identify areas with highest levels of low income households • Support existing projects/community schemes • All tenures qualify • Local Authorities expected to be a key player by government • Cost-effectiveness

  11. Potential Partners?! • Energy Suppliers/Electricity generators • Local Authorities • Local Strategic Partnerships • Local Service Boards • Community Planning Partnerships • Regional Development Agencies • Homes & Communities Groups • Warm Zones • Local Community Organisations

  12. Red = Warm Zones; Green = Green Streets; White = Health Through Warmth; Dark blue = CEEF funded; Light blue = British Gas Council Tax Rebates; Yellow = Transition Towns; Pink = Individual CPPs

  13. The future? CESP will act as a bridge to the future, testing out particular approaches to the treatment of houses and communities, and how householders might interact with a community-based approach.

More Related