html5-img
1 / 6

AIDA-2 Gas Detectors 1 st meeting AGENDA 1. Analysis of the EoIs

AIDA-2 Gas Detectors 1 st meeting AGENDA 1. Analysis of the EoIs 2. Discussion of the guide lines 3 . Discussion of the model of the gas detector community participation in AIDA-2 (NA vs JRA) 4 . Messages from the gas detector community for Laurent's Vienna talk 5 . Next steps.

dara
Download Presentation

AIDA-2 Gas Detectors 1 st meeting AGENDA 1. Analysis of the EoIs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AIDA-2 Gas Detectors 1stmeeting AGENDA • 1. Analysis of the EoIs • 2. Discussion of the guide lines • 3. Discussion of the model of the gas detector community participation in AIDA-2 (NA vs JRA) • 4. Messages from the gas detector community for Laurent's Vienna talk • 5. Next steps

  2. EoIs - LIST

  3. from K. Desch’s slides • Do not ask for fundingyourownlittlesubdetectorwith I3 money • Do not ask for appointing high-levelengineers (thisisrapidly far tooexpensive, and you are supposed to have them in yourinstitute) • RathersharecommonR&Ds or equipmentwithothercommunities (for instance a commonelectronicdevelopement, precisionmechanics, new materials,…)

  4. WP MODELS Models of the participation of the gaseous detector community to AIDA-2 3 alternative options: • via a large NA • via a large JRA • via both an NA and a JRA In any case fix total amount of money, FE studies included (~ 750 keuro)  no space for everything !  maximize the advantages for the whole community (even if this can represent some sacrifices) main features of the two different action types: • NA (Networking Activity) has as deliverables results of new technology investigation; financial support is mainly for post-docs and traveling, limited for material. • JRA (Joint Reserach Activity) has as tasks developments to improve infrastructures (like accelerators, beam lines and similar); financial support is mainly for  material or  manpower to be employed in related facilities (not for R&D).

  5. PROPOSAL PRELIMINARY • A single NA including the major consolidated InfraStructures (IS) exhibiting complementary features  budget mainly for manpower & travelling • IS (directly financed) • CERN • MPGD common lab & test BEAM, SRS (read-out system) support and maintenance, support to gas-detector simulation (progress and maintenance) • INFN cluster • Bari - dedicated electronics, GEM & RPC lab • Frascati & Torvergata– GEM lab, material lab, RPC lab • Trieste – THGEM & photon detection lab • SACLAY • MICROMEGAS lab: design, fabrication, assembly, characterisation • Lyon • High rate, fine time precision RPC (electronics, low R materials), realization and test • Desy • TPC development IF (1 T magnet, movable stage, power, cooling, slow controls,…) • Other groups active in the gas detector field (indirect support) • Identify synergies with the ISs • Agree with IS groups about commont activity and get from their resources support (mainly travelling) to make concrete use of the ISs

  6. NEXT MEETING 2 options – decision now • APRIL 11 (Friday) at 16.00 • APRIL 14 (Monday) at 9.30 The community is too large for other approaches: the coordinators chose a date and each group takes part via a representative who is available

More Related