1 / 24

They Had the Facts, Why Didn’t They Act?

They Had the Facts, Why Didn’t They Act?. Rachel Hogan Carr August 9, 2017. Understanding and Improving Public Response to National Weather Service’s Flood Forecasts.

dansereau
Download Presentation

They Had the Facts, Why Didn’t They Act?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. They Had the Facts, Why Didn’t They Act? Rachel Hogan Carr August 9, 2017 Understanding and Improving Public Response to National Weather Service’s Flood Forecasts

  2. Nurture Nature Center is a non-profit organization in Easton, PA, that has been working to educate the public about flooding. NNC has undertaken several projects with NOAA and NWS, including its “Focus on Floods” education campaign, to understand and share information about how the public perceives and acts upon flood risk.

  3. Social Science: A Key Step in Building a Weather-Ready Nation • In 2012, NNC received one of four social science projects awarded to look at decision-making during extreme weather events. Projects are managed through the Office of Weather and Air Quality in the NOAA Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research with funding from the U.S. Weather Research Program and the NOAA National Weather Service (NWS). • In 2014, NOAA Sea Grant and the NJ Sea Grant Consortium funded a project to study NWS’ coastal flood forecast products as part of the Coastal Storm Awareness Program. This presentation was prepared by Nurture Nature Center using federal funds under the Coastal Storm Awareness Program (NOAA awards NA13OAR4830227, NA13OAR4830228, NA13OAR4830229) from the National Sea Grant College Program, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. The federal funds were provided via appropriations under the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act of 2013 (P.L.113-2) and the Sea Grant Act (33 U.S.C. 1121 et seq.) Funding was awarded to the financial hosts of the Sea Grant College Programs in Connecticut, New Jersey and New York via their financial host insitutions, the University of Connecticut, the New Jersey Seagrant Consortium, and the Research Foundation of State University of New York respectively. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Sea Grant College Program, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. Department of Commerce, nor any of the other listed organizations.

  4. Partners: • East Carolina University • Rutgers University/Jacques Cousteau National Estuarine Research Reserve • RMC Research Corporation (evaluators) • National Weather Service (NWS) Mid-Atlantic River Forecast Center • (NWS) Mt. Holly, NJ Weather Forecast Office • (NWS) Binghamton, NY Weather Forecast Office • NOAA Sea Grant and NJ Sea Grant Consortium

  5. What Is the Issue? NWS flood forecast and warning tools offer tremendous amounts of timely, accurate data. But: People often don’t respond the way they should to protect life and property. FLOOD RISK AND UNCERTAINTY PROJECT “ What we need now is to package and communicate weather warning information so that people understand it and take the right action with the time they are given.” Gary Szatkowski, Meteorologist in Charge of the NWS Philadelphia, PA/Mt. Holly NJ WFO

  6. Questions: • What tools (NWS and other) are populations in Pennsylvania and New Jersey using to understand their riverine and coastal flood risk? • What improvements to these products can make them easier to understand and more likely to motivate people to take protection actions? • For coastal: What role can the emergency briefing play in communicating flood risk and motivating protective actions among residential populations?

  7. What Methods Are We Using? Focus groups, surveys and interviews Participants respond to flood tools presented through a scenario format. • Riverine: Four focus groups with residents in Easton, PA and Lambertville, NJ (2012-2013) • Coastal: Four with Ocean/Monmouth County residents; One focus group with emergency managers; Broadcast Meteorologist Interviews (2014) • Both: Surveys with residents • Iterative testing of products – two rounds in each community

  8. Focus Groups: A facilitated discussion about the tools • 15 participants per session, average, flood-affected individuals Participants give feedback about: • Timing of products • Graphic design and visual clarity • Ways the products motivated action • How they share the information with others

  9. Riverine Scenario: A Simulated East Coast Hurricane The 7-day scenario includes a series of products issued by the NWS, including: • Hurricane cones • Hydrographs • Significant River Flood Outlooks • Quantitative Precipitation • Forecasts • Flood Watches and Warnings • Ensemble forecasts showing • uncertainty

  10. Coastal Scenario: Superstorm Sandy, Actual Products NWS Coastal Flood Forecast and Warning Tools: • Extra-Tropical Surge Graphic • Surface Prognosis Maps

  11. Tools Continued… NWS Coastal Flood Forecast and Warning Tools: • Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts • Wind Speed and Direction Maps • Briefings…

  12. What did we learn? • Local specificity is critical for motivating action • River levels are critically important • Visual design and language choice can create barriers for people trying to understand and use NWS flood forecast products • Residents want to hear detailed action steps – tell them what to do! • Coastal residents and emergency managers valued emergency briefings • Day T-5 (and T-4) were critical times to receive information through briefings and other means

  13. Emergency Briefings: An Important Resource! Briefings: Keep them short! Put action steps up front Keep storm details to the back Consider having municipalities distribute

  14. Emergency Briefings: Connecting to the forecaster Briefings: Inclusion of a “Personal Plea” was highly motivational Briefings can convey tone, and prioritize risk Briefings should be reserved for high-impact events NOAA is the authoritative source for information, but residents expect and want to receive weather information from local municipal officials and EMS

  15. River Levels Matter HYDROGRAPH was the highest-ranked product in riverine communities: • “Very clear, easy to read & useful.” • High results for visual clarity, • usefulness and location specificity. • Suggestion: link every flood • product to hydrograph

  16. Use Color, and Use It Carefully COLORin graphics can help or hurt people’s understanding of risk. Participants discussed: • Positive use of color (Quantitative • Precipitation Forecast) • Confusing use of color (inundation maps • and flood outlooks) • Lack of color/font variations (Flood • Watches and Warnings)

  17. Location Details GEOGRAPHIC SPECIFICITY helps understanding of risk: Use hyper-local info when possible • Poor ratings for this product • due to lack of location detail • Product unhelpful; did not • prompt action

  18. OTHER PRODUCTS Extra-Tropical Surge Graphic Clarifies geographic specificity, differentiates between observed and forecast flood levels, provides clearer legend and definition of terms, provides summary at top in red, along with cautionary language and a link to local impacts.

  19. Example of a Draft Mocked-up Hydrograph Incorporates various focus groups recommendations, including the careful use of text, and color variation

  20. Example of a Draft Significant River Flood Outlook Adds geographic specificity, demarcates service area boundaries, differentiates between levels of risk and provides more specific legend.

  21. Uncertainty UNCERTAINTY MESSAGESneed to be carefully considered. • Current ensemble forecast graphics were very confusing • Some participants did want to receive uncertainty information • Almost no participants could properly interpret the information from the current suite • of Meteorological Model Ensemble River Forecasts (MMEFS) graphics MMEFS Graphics:

  22. Example of a Draft Mocked-up Uncertainty Graphic Incorporates various focus groups recommendations, including the careful use of text, and color variation

  23. Socialscience.Focusonfloods.org • Findings • Research bibliography on • social science related to flooding • Project information Includes : Coastal.Focusonfloods.org • Project information • Videos • Resources

  24. Thank you! Rachel Hogan Carr Director Nurture Nature Center Easton, PA www.nurturenaturecenter.org www.focusonfloods.org socialscience.focusonfloods.org rhogan@nurturenature.org 610-253-4432

More Related