policy impact in the grow regions l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
POLICY IMPACT IN THE GROW REGIONS PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
POLICY IMPACT IN THE GROW REGIONS

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 61

POLICY IMPACT IN THE GROW REGIONS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 172 Views
  • Uploaded on

POLICY IMPACT IN THE GROW REGIONS. SOUTH EAST ENGLAND. Regional Economic Strategy for South East England 2006 – 2016: The European Dimension Eileen Armstrong, Assistant Director, Strategy, SEEDA . Building the Regional Economic Strategy. 16 engagement events – 2000 attended

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'POLICY IMPACT IN THE GROW REGIONS' - daniel_millan


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide2

Regional Economic Strategyfor South East England 2006 – 2016: The European Dimension Eileen Armstrong, Assistant Director, Strategy, SEEDA

building the regional economic strategy
Building the Regional Economic Strategy
  • 16 engagement events – 2000 attended
  • Consultation document – 320 responses
  • Draft RES – 180 responses
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment / Sustainability Appraisal
the challenges
The Challenges
  • The global challenge
    • Invest in success
  • Smart growth
    • Invest in potential
  • Sustainable prosperity
    • Invest in quality of life
framework
Framework

Vision

  • By 2016 the South East will be a world class region achieving sustainable prosperity

Values

  • Building on excellence for global competitiveness
  • Investing in potential to maximise performance
  • Safeguarding quality of life as competitive advantage

Objectives

  • Global competitiveness
  • Smart growth
  • Sustainable prosperity
measuring success
Measuring Success

Three Headline Targets

  • Achieve an average annual increase in GVA per capita of at least 3%
  • Increase productivity per worked by an average 2.4% annually, from £39,000 in 2005 to at least £50,000 by 2016 (constant prices)
  • Reduce the rate of increase in the region’s ecological footprint (from 6.3 global hectares per capita in 2003, currently increasing at 1.1% per annum), stabilise it and seek to reduce it by 2016
the actions
The Actions
  • 75 actions for the region
  • 30 ‘new’ actions
  • Lead responsibilities identified
  • SEEDA to lead on 25 actions
  • 8 transformational actions
transformational actions
Transformational Actions
  • 100% Next Generation Broadband
  • Science and Innovation Campuses
  • Regional Infrastructure Fund
  • Raising Economic Activity Rates
  • Skills Escalator
  • Global Leadership in Environmental Technologies
  • Education - Led Regeneration
  • Making the Most of 2012
connecting the actions
Connecting the Actions

Cross cutting themes

  • Europe
  • Information and Communications Technologies
  • Culture, Sport and Creative Industries
  • Equalities and Diversity
  • Rural Areas
the draft eu regional competitiveness programme 2007 2013
The draft EU Regional Competitiveness Programme 2007-2013

Principles of the Programme

  • Pan-regional not spatially targeted, linking instances of good practice between weak and strong areas
  • Linked to RES (and CSG; NSRF)
  • Sustainability is the key theme: sustainable production and consumption; sustainable communities
  • Innovation runs through programme as a “golden thread”
  • Weighting system to apply after projects reach quality threshold to help achieve specific objectives, eg soft landing for current Objective 2 areas; build-up maximum impact in Assisted Areas; promote intra-regional linkages; promote innovative actions
  • Competitiveness & sustainability applies to all sectors including public/ ngo
  • Avoid proliferation of projects (small programme: €21m over 7 years)
  • Avoid proliferation of business support projects (in line with national drive)
slide14

ANDALUSIAN

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

STRATEGY

Mr. Andrés Sánchez Hernández

General Secretary of Sustainability for the

Regional Environmental Government of Andalusia

London, November 30th 2006

slide15

ANDALUSIAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

INDEX

1.- Background

2.- Geographic limits

4.-Concept, premises and scope of development

5.-Characteristics of the document and

operative criteria

6.- Methodology

7.- Contents of the Strategy

8.- Actual accomplishments

9.- Future accomplishments

slide16

ANDALUSIAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

BACKGROUND

  • SUMMIT OF RÍO 92
  • EUROPEAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (GOTEMBURG)
  • REGIONAL AGENDA21 (2000)
slide17

ANDALUSIAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

GEOGRAPHIC LIMITS

Nº of inhabitants = 7.935.074

Surface = 87.591 KM2

Nº of municipalities = 771

Coastline = 836 km

slide18

ANDALUSIAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

CONCEPT

The Andalusian Sustainable Development Strategy establishes the basis which allows for a linked growth between economy and the environment in our Region for the next decades

PREMISES / STARTING PRINCIPLES

  • Recognising sustainable development as a right and duty of all citizens
  • Incorporating the environment as a component of sectorial and public administration decisions
  • Progressive elimination of the production and consuming systems which put at risk the conservation of natural resources

SCOPE OF DEVELOPMENT

  • Environmental scope
  • Social scope
  • Economic scope
grow inter regional conference challenges of achieving sustainability in high growth regions

GROW INTER-REGIONAL CONFERENCE: Challenges of achieving sustainability in High Growth Regions

The Marshal Office of the Małopolska Region

Poland

Aneta Widak

challenges of achieving sustainability in high growth regions
Challenges of achieving sustainability in High Growth Regions

Contents:

  • Overview of Małopolska Region
  • The Małopolska Region Development Strategy for 2007-13
  • Małopolska Regional Operational Programme 2007-13
  • Competitiveness and Cohesion
  • Strategic projects
  • GROW post-conference publication
slide22

Małopolska Region in focus

Flag

Emblem

Administrative division

  • 22 poviats/counties
  • 182 gminas/comunes

Population

  • 3.2 million inhabitants

150 km

slide23

Małopolska Region in focus

Region of Education

  • 26 higher education institutions
  • 160 000 students
  • 10 000 academic teachers

Jagiellonian University

the oldest Polish university,

established in 1364

slide24

Malopolska Region in focus

Region of Culture and Heritage

  • Krakow Philharmonic
  • 20 theatres
  • 80 art galleries
  • 100 museums
  • 8 sites registered on the UNESCO World Cultural Heritage List (out of 16 in Poland)
business environment centres located in ma opolska region established by international corporations
Business Environment Centres located in Małopolska Region(established by international corporations)

> 4

2-4

1

0

Małopolska Region in focus

Region of Business

  • Bayer
  • Cap Gemini
  • Ernst & Young
  • Communication
  • Factory
  • Electrolux
  • Exult
  • IBM
  • Indesit
  • KPMG
  • Lufthansa
  • Philip Morris
  • Google

9

3

4

2

13

slide26

Małopolska Region in focus

Region of Tourism

  • 9 mill. visitors
  • Over 1 mill. foreign tourists
  • Over 257 hotels
  • 75 thousand beds
  • Over 1,000 restaurants and clubs only in Krakow
ma opolska 2015
„MAŁOPOLSKA 2015”

THE MAŁOPOLSKA REGION

DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

FOR 2007-2013

FIELD B

Social development and standard of living

FIELD A

Economic competitiveness

FIELD C

Institutional potential

THREE FIELDS OF ACTIVITY

ma opolska 201528
„MAŁOPOLSKA 2015”

Małopolska’s challenges:

  • Competence-related challenges– how to become a partner and a true participant in the international race of skills and competence?
  • Technological challenges – how to catch up with the most developed and technologically advanced regions?
  • Social advancement related challenges – how to ensure relative equality and high quality of public services and standards of living addressing the aspirations of inhabitants?
  • Environmental challenges – how to ensure sustainability of the natural environment and the high quality of the spatial environment in the face of strong development pressure and economic aspirations?
  • Symbolical challenges – how to build a modern image of the region, convincing for the developed world, and at the same time to retain and cherish one's own unique identity?
  • Political challenges – how to ensure the high quality and autonomy of regional development policy which would permit the implementation of the strategy adopted, how to best involve the social partners and civil society?
ma opolska 201529
„MAŁOPOLSKA 2015”

Key principles of the Strategy

I. The principle of partnership

II. The principle of strategic management of regional development

III. The principle of the autonomy of Małopolska's regional development Strategy compatible with national social and economic development policy as well as with the EU cohesion policy –

IV. The principle of socially, spatially and environmentally sustainable development

malopolska regional policy
Malopolska Regional Policy

Motto of Malopolska regional development policy:

„As much competitiveness as possible.

As little convergence as necessary.”

Mr. Janusz Sepiol,

Marshal of Malopolska Region

ma opolska regional policy competitiveness vs cohesion balance
Małopolska Regional Policy:competitiveness vs cohesion - balance

100%

90%

80%

54%

70%

66%

60%

50%

40%

30%

46%

20%

34%

10%

0%

IROP 2004-2006

MROP 2007-13

expenditures on competitiveness

expenditures on cohesion

questions about development
Questions about development
  • Will we have enough time to support competitiveness focusing our resources and time on pro-cohesion activities ?
  • Does Małopolska and other Polish regions have time to follow traditional path of development (first infrastructure, and then innovations)?
  • Is it possible to choose a „short-cut” on the way of achieving competitiveness,skipping cohesion phase?
grow post conference publication
GROW Post-conference publication

Cohesion Policy and Regions

New Perspective 2007-13

Edited by

Jacek Woźniak

Kraków 2006

Regional Framework Operations GROW and SMART (CI INTERREG)

slide37

Thank you for your attention

www.malopolska.pl

Aneta Widak

The Marshal Office of the Malopolska Region

Department of Regional and Spatial Policy

ul. Basztowa 22, 31-156 Kraków

E-mail: Aneta.Widak@umwm.pl

slide38

Małopolska Invites

www.malopolskie.pl

slide39

POLICY IMPACT IN THE GROW REGIONS

NOORD-BRABANT, THE NETHERLANDS

sustainability from margin to mainstream towards a sustainable brabant
Sustainability from margin to mainstreamTowards a sustainable Brabant
  • Martin Bakker
  • Policy advisor
  • 30/11/06
what has brabant done so far
What has Brabant done so far
  • Brabant Manifesto (1997)
  • Brabant Elan Programme (1998)
  • Strategic Agenda (1998)
  • Telos Institute; Measuring Sustainability
new approaches the process
New approaches (the process)
  • Strategic layer
    • Recommending committee
    • Debates
  • Practical layer
    • Programme and projects
  • Citizens
new approaches the content
New approaches (the content)
  • Direction, cohesion and result
    • Shifting focus from margin to the mainstream
    • Partnerships between established parties
    • Concrete projects with measurable results
regional government can play an essential role
Regional government can play an essential role
  • Bringing parties together
  • Promoting a bottom up approach
  • In line with the objectives of parties involved
  • Struggling with the scaling up of projects
slide49

The sustainability concept of the Emilia-Romagna RegionCompetitiveness, environment protection and social inclusion in Emilia Romagna

Windsor, November 30, 2006

Stefano Marani

Senior advisor for Spatial Economy

& Regional Development Programmes

some emilia romagna development descriptors

Some Emilia-Romagna development descriptors

From being one of the poorest italian regions (beginning of XXth century), E-R achieved

a per capita income higher than italian/european average;

the best service network for persons and families;

the highest % of students, attracting young people from all Italy;

the location of a number of well developed/advanced industrial districts in different sectors (from machinery to biomedicals).

slide51

Urban sprawl, a development

“collateral damage”..

1976-2001: aprox. + 100% in

urbanised land, esp. in

Municipalities

from 5.000 to 20.000 inhab.

a governance for sustainability

A governance for sustainability

the development of towns and regions is more and more dependent from globalization of economic and social relationships;

spatial issues of development can be better faced through cooperation between different administrative/government levels (governance);

spatial approach overcomes sectoral approach of development policies, through cooperation between institutions and sectors operating on the same territory.

slide53

Socio-cultural System

PTR

Economic System

Environmental System

The Regional Territorial Plan

Efficiency

Quality

(ESDP)

Identity

sustainability concepts goals for territorial competitiveness

Sustainability concepts, goals for territorial competitiveness

Quality: building contexts rich in opportunities, well-preserved landscapes, social and environmental resources sustainable use

Efficiency: compact settlements to reduce sprawl, social services cost minimization, cost reduction for technological/environmental infrastructures

Identity of local communities: belonging sense to the “real town” beyond administrative boundaries, to cultural and work relationships of the community, the region, the global economic and cultural networks

core strategic issues

Core strategic issues

Urban centers networking: settlements common planning to manage “real town”, cost/benefit equitable; networking of utilities infrastructures and of high level services, re-qualification of the central Emilia and the coast, recovery of the Apennines and Po river lowlands from its marginal position;

Ecological networks re-construction: “to besiege” urban spaces with “ecosystemic infrastructure”, renewable energy promotion, water and materials sustainable use, environmental quality and safety;

Knowledge economy promotion: against competitiveness loss, promoting change from material to non-material economy, based on research and innovation, broadband for local systems’ public and private actors, logistics (vs. transportation infrastructure), continuing education, culture;

A new welfare: health and advanced services for citizens, targeting in particular non-self sufficient elderly people, immigrants skills qualification; multicultural integration.

from a governance perspective this means

From a governance perspective, this means..

presently, no institutional level can manage by itself development and social cohesion issues: integration in economic, social and environmental planning strategies is a must;

institutional partnership need to be promoted and enforced in a contractual way, with clear commitments among partners (participation and cooperation);

development actions need a proper territorial scale (subsidiarity);

evaluation (ex-ante, in itinere, ex-post) must become the “communication language” of institutional partnership.

the special area programs

The Special Area Programs

SAP are integrated investiment plans, pubblic and public/private;

proposed by a local system to solve problems/catch opportunities;

limited time and budget;

subsidiarity principle-based;

useful to implement local multi-actor strategies, multi-fund investment, networking for local resources development;

aimed at creating administrative, social and entrepreneurial environement to attract investments.

the priority axis 2 of the ob 2 spd

The Priority axis 2 of the Ob. 2 SPD

Priority axis 2 deals with territorial dev.;

aimed at “distance reduction” from the most advanced regional areas;

subdivided into 3 territorial measures (Po river lowlands, Appenines and Central plain (phasing out);

different context and objectives;based on negotaited programming among institution, social and economic actors;

“Program Conferences”, to decide project to be realized and define Local Dev. Plans;

two 3-years program periods

rural dev plan priority iii integrated dev actions

Rural Dev. Plan - Priority III – integrated dev. actions

Mountain area

  • Rural roads/afforestation
  • Water network improvement
  • Support to farmers for land conservation
  • Rural villages recovery
  • Renewable energy
  • Hydrogeological risk prevention

Negotiated rural development plans at province level

Po river plain

  • Modernisation of rural infrastructures
  • Landscape conservation
  • Rural/naturalistic tourism promotion
  • Ecological network reconstruction
  • Integrated territorial marketing projects for

traditional productions

slide60

Plans and programs sustainability is assessed by..

Eco-industrial development projects, shared among Local Authorities, for greening local industrial estates;

Accountability to citizens on social and environmental of choices, through Agenda XXI processes presently and/or EMS of Local Authorities;

Strategic Impact Assessment of european and regional/local plans and programs:

SEA to SPD and Rural dev. Plan;

ValSAT (TIA-sound) to territorial/spatial planning tools (e.g. urban dev., environmental management plans, ect.)