1 / 47

ASW Reality vs. Rumor Activity

Analysis of Student Work Coordinator and Think Tank Update Broadcast: Wednesday, July 16 1:00 – 3:00 p.m. ASW Reality vs. Rumor Activity. NC Professional Teaching Standards. Standard I: Teachers demonstrate leadership.

daniel-sloan
Download Presentation

ASW Reality vs. Rumor Activity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Analysis of Student Work Coordinator and Think Tank UpdateBroadcast: Wednesday, July 161:00 – 3:00 p.m.

  2. ASW Reality vs. Rumor Activity

  3. NC Professional Teaching Standards Standard I: Teachers demonstrate leadership. Standard II:Teachers establish a respectfulenvironmentfor a diverse populationof students. Standard III:Teachers know the content they teach. Standard IV:Teachers facilitate learning for their students. Standard V: Teachers reflect on their practice. Standard VI: Teachers contribute to the academic success of students.

  4. NC Educator Evaluation System Overview of Standard 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Contribute to Academic Success Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment KnowContent Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice 3 Rating Categories 5 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth

  5. Overview of Standard 6 6 End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) tests 6 Career Technical Education Assessment 6 NC Final Exams Contribute to Academic Success 6 K-3 Checkpoints 6 Analysis of Student Work

  6. Analysis of Student Work In 2014-2015, ASW is the Standard 6 measure for teachers in Advanced Placement, Arts Education, Healthful Living, International Baccalaureate, and World Languages. Growth is based on student work submitted by teachers and rated by content experts in a “blind review” process. Contribute to Academic Success 6 Analysis of Student Work

  7. Analysis of Student Work Process • Fall 2011 Design Groups • Spring 2013 ASW Pilot • 2013 – 2014 ASW Pilot

  8. ASW 2014 Pilot Participants Over 1100 NC Educators Representing 8 Regions Content Areas Occupational Preparation 7th Grade Social Studies World History World Languages Advanced Placement Arts Education Healthful Living International Baccalaureate

  9. ? Questions about the previous section? Type them in the question box now.

  10. Overview of ASW Process

  11. Overview of the ASW Process Teacher verifies schedule and chooses objectives for each course Teacher collects TAs of student work Reviewers rate Evidence Collections Teacher Uploads Evidence Collection to Online Platform Teacher receives category rating for Standard 6

  12. Overview of the ASW Process

  13. Overview of the ASW Process

  14. ASW Process: A Quick Guide

  15. Overview of the ASW Process • Items needed to compile a Timelapse Artifact (TA): • A specific objective measured over 2 distinct points in time • Work Sample Options: • Student or Whole Class • Method(s) or tool(s) for collecting • 2 work samples • Context

  16. Overview of the ASW Process • Objectives: • Using the Strands and Standards guidance charts, 5 objectives will be chosen.

  17. ? Questions about the previous section? Type them in the question box now.

  18. Overview of the ASW Process • Work Samples: • Option 1 – Student Work Samples • Collect and keep 2 work • samples: • for each class member • for the objective • at 2 separate points in time

  19. Overview of the ASW Process • Work Samples: • Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples • 2 work samples that • represent the entire class • for the objective • at 2 separate points in time

  20. Overview of the ASW Process • Method(s) or tool(s) for collecting: • Pre Test • Sljdflkjdfsdfljsdfljdfsdflkjsdfsdflnksdflnsdfsdfllsdfsdflnsdfsdfklsdflkjffslflksdflkjsdfsdf • Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdfsdf;dfmsdf;sdfsdfmsdflmf, sdfmsd. Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk • Ljdflkjfljkdlkjsdftjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkwklweljsdfljsdfsdljsdfljsdf • Sljdflkjdfsdfljsdfljdfsdflkjsdfsdflnksdflnsdfsdfllsdfsdflnsdfsdfklsdflkjffslflksdflkjsdfsdf • Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdfsdf;dfmsdf;sdfsdfmsdflmf, sdfmsd. Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk • Ljdflkjfljkdlkjsdftjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkwklweljsdfljsdfsdljsdfljsdf • Sljdflkjdfsdfljsdfljdfsdflkjsdfsdflnksdflnsdfsdfllsdfsdflnsdfsdfklsdflkjffslflksdflkjsdfsdf

  21. Overview of the ASW Process Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples Online platform will select 3 students The TAwill be compiled using the Student Work Samples from these selected students. TA 1

  22. Overview of the ASW Process Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples If a student work sample is unavailable, that student will be reshuffled to create another sampling. TA 1

  23. Overview of the ASW Process Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples Context for 1st work sample How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective? 1 1 1

  24. Overview of the ASW Process 2 Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples Context for 2nd work sample How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective? 2 2

  25. Overview of the ASW Process 2 Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples Context for Growth Describe the growth that occurred between points one and two. 1 2 1 2 1

  26. Overview of the ASW Process 2 Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples 1 2 1 Timelapse Artifact 1 2 1

  27. Overview of the ASW Process Timelapse Artifact Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples Be sure to keep theWhole Class Work Samples If the composition of your class changes, do not worry, submit your two work samples. Work Sample 1 1 Timelapse Artifact #2 Work Sample 2

  28. Overview of the ASW Process Timelapse Artifact Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples Whole Class Work Sample 1 1 Timelapse Artifact Whole Class Work Sample 2

  29. Overview of the ASW Process Timelapse Artifacts will be uploaded to the online platform. TA 3 Student TA 1 Student TA 4 Student TA 2 Whole Class TA 5 Whole Class

  30. ? Questions about the previous section? Type them in the question box now.

  31. Principal’s Input Ensure Teacher Participation

  32. Principal’s Input Principal meets with the teacher to ensure that the 5 objectives chosen use the parameters in the Strands & Standards Guidance Chart Some examples of meetings: • PDPs • teacher meetings

  33. Principal’s Input The Principal is notified when a reshuffle is used by a teacher. TA 1

  34. Overview of the ASW Process Blind Review: The Evidence Collection will be reviewed by 2 content area specialists. Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

  35. Overview of the ASW Process Blind Review: The platform sends the evidence collection to two reviewers who have been matched to the teacher because of their similar content area expertise. Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

  36. Overview of the ASW Process Blind Review: If the category ratings from each reviewer are the same, then the review process is complete and the Standard 6 rating will be posted for that year. Meets Expected Growth Reviewer #1 Category Rating: Meets Expected Growth Reviewer #2

  37. Overview of the ASW Process Blind Review: If the category ratings from the two reviewers are not the same, the Evidence Collection is automatically sent to a 3rd reviewer for an additional review to get a rating for that year. Exceeds Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Reviewer #3 Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

  38. Overview of the ASW Process 2-Step ASW Process Review: Evidence Collection Checklist ASW Quality Rubric

  39. Overview of the ASW Process Evidence Collection Rating Form: • D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth • M = Meets Expected Growth • E = Exceeds Expected Growth Transfer your rating for each TA from the quality rubric to the table below: Use this table to determine the overall rating for the evidence collection Overall Rating for the entire Evidence Collection Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth

  40. NC Educator Evaluation System Overview of Standard 6 Contribute to Academic Success 1 2 3 4 5 6 Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment KnowContent Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice 3 Rating Categories 5 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished

  41. 3-Year Rolling Average An educator receives an effectiveness status only after he or she has 3 years of data on Standard 6 A 3-year rolling average of growth data from Standard 6 is used as part of determining overall status 6 6 6 Standard Standard Standard Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

  42. Demonstration of 3-Year Rolling Average for 2014-2017 Mr. NC’s 3-year rolling average of growth data: 2014-15 Does Not Meet (Year 1) 2015-16 Meets (Year 2) + 2016-17 Meets (Year 3) Mr. NC’s 3-year rolling average for 2014-2017 Meets Expected Growth Standard Standard Standard 6 6 6 Year 1 2014-2015 Does Not Meet Expected Growth Year 2 2015-2016 Meets Expected Growth Year 3 2016-2017Meets Expected Growth Contribute to Academic Success

  43. Effectiveness Status for 2016 - 2017 Effective X X X X X 3 year rolling average for 2014 – 2017 Meets Expected Growth

  44. ASW Wikispace • Online Training Modules • Important Forms • Frequently Asked Questions Visit the Wiki here: http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/

  45. Regional Training Schedule – August, 2014 (Known locations available on the ASW Wikispace)

  46. Questions about ASW Process Jennifer DeNeal Race to the Top Project Coordinator for Educator Effectiveness North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Have a question about educator effectiveness?  Send an email to: educatoreffectiveness@dpi.nc.gov

  47. Questions about Educator Effectiveness North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Have a question about Educator Effectiveness?  visit www.ncpublicschools.org/effectiveness-model or http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/NCEES+Wiki

More Related