1 / 45

WATER DAMAGE INVESTIGATIONS MORE THAN SUCKING AIR

WATER DAMAGE INVESTIGATIONS MORE THAN SUCKING AIR. Connie A. Morbach, M.S., CHMM, CIE, ASCS Sanit-Air, Inc. 1311 North Main/ Clawson, MI 48017 248 435-2088 connie@sanit-air.com. IS Mold New?. Mold is not new, awareness has increased Changes in building construction Tighter

damita
Download Presentation

WATER DAMAGE INVESTIGATIONS MORE THAN SUCKING AIR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WATER DAMAGE INVESTIGATIONSMORE THAN SUCKING AIR Connie A. Morbach, M.S., CHMM, CIE, ASCS Sanit-Air, Inc. 1311 North Main/ Clawson, MI 48017 248 435-2088 connie@sanit-air.com

  2. IS Mold New? • Mold is not new, awareness has increased • Changes in building construction • Tighter • Porous Materials =Good Nutrients • Construction to allow high moisture • Better testing methodologies • Physician Awareness • Link previously unexplained illnesses

  3. Tight Construction • Focus on energy conservation resulted in tighter buildings with less natural ventilation • 75 years ago, cracks in the building envelope allowed for 5 - 10 air changes per hour (ACH) • Now building codes permit 0.35 ACH • Contaminants are not diluted out • Higher concentration results in greater exposure and opportunity for amplification on building materials • The solution is to build tight / ventilate right

  4. New Building Materials Are Good Nutrients • Materials high in cellulose content that are porous retain moisture and provide good nutrient material for mold amplification • Drywall • Oriented Strand Board (OSB) • Plywood • Ceiling Tiles • Hasty construction with less detail to preventing water intrusion and providing mechanisms for removal

  5. MOLD IS NOT NEW Leviticus 14:33-48 This passage describes mold contamination . Instructs priests to inspect homes and scrape off mold if it is present. After 14 days, the home should be inspected again, if the mold returns, its a “destructive mildew” and the house must be torn down - its stones, timbers and all plaster - and “taken out of town to an unclean place”.

  6. MOLD FACTS • Mold Spores are Ubiquitous in Nature • Indoors, Mold is not a Problem Until it Amplifies • Mold Requires Water to Amplify (colonize) • During Periods of Growth and Metabolism, Mold Cells Produce Volatile Organic Compounds and Mycotoxins • Under Stress (Drying Out), Mold Produces Spores • Spores Become Airborne When Disturbed by Airflow, Disruptions, Pressure Differentials • Mycotoxins Become Airborne by Attaching to Spores

  7. ASPECTS OF A MOLD EVALUATION • Visual Evaluation • Moisture Measurements • Environmental Parameters • Development of Hypothesis • Development of Sampling Plan • Sampling

  8. Visual Evaluations • Most important aspect of investigation • Evaluate water stains and visible growth • Ceilings, walls, floors, floor coverings • Hidden damage is often more severe than damage on the outer surfaces • Access ports, boroscopes, and other invasive techniques might be necessary • Ventilation systems • filters, duct lining

  9. Surface Moisture Measurements • Non-penetrating • Calibrated for different materials • Drywall • Wood • Concrete • Probes • Hard to reach areas • Sub-surface with long probes

  10. Aw < 0.80, ERH <80% Aw < 0.80-0.90, ERH <80-90% Aw >0.90, ERH >90% water Aw: Minimum water activity level at 25°C ERH: Equilibrium relative humidity

  11. Aspergillus versicolor Aw 0.74-0.79 Ulocladium chartarum Aw 0.89 Stachybotrys chartarum Aw 0.94 Aw: Minimum water activity level at 25°C

  12. Evaluate Hidden Damage • Mold that is hidden and visible is equivalent to visible mold and must be evaluated • US EPA cautions that mold on the backside of walls and behind wallpaper is frequently more severe than mold on the painted side of walls • Precautions must be taken to prevent cross-contamination during invasive evaluation

  13. Environmental Parameters • Temperature • Relative Humidity • Carbon Dioxide • Air flow • Smoke pens • Pressure relationship

  14. Carbon Dioxide • Produced by people and combustion appliances • OSHA PEL 5000 ppm • Previous recommendation of 1000 ppm • Outdoors in MI typically 350 - 450 ppm • Can provide information on tightness of a building • Can provide information on ventilation relative to industry guidelines

  15. When is Testing Indicated • Illnesses associated with biological contaminants • Aspergillosis • Hypersensitive diseases • Diagnostic tool to assist in the development of a remediation scope • Baselines before remediation • Verify remediation effectiveness • Litigation support

  16. Interpretation of Data • No regulatory limits (PELS, TLV’s) • Case by case basis • Build your own database • Rely on published studies

  17. Air Sample Interpretation • Indoor vs. Outdoor • Predominant indoor organisms different than outdoors • Complaint vs. non-complaint • Indicator organisms • Stachybotrys, Memnoniella • Penicillium • Aspergillus • Persistent and consistent presence of organisms

  18. Source Sample Interpretation • Do predominant surface contaminants match air contaminants • Affected vs. non-affected • Are hyphae present • Do post cleaning samples improve

  19. Common Testing Mistakes 1. Too little emphasis on visual evaluation Essential to establish test sites • Moisture meters • Staining • Deterioration • Visible growth • Evaluation of hidden growth

  20. Common Testing Mistakes 2. Poor Quality Control • Sterile techniques not implemented • Inaccurate calibration • Mislabeling of samples • Media not subjected to QC • No temperature control during shipping

  21. Common Testing Mistakes 3. Too Much Emphasis on Total Concentrations • No PEL’s TLV’s - dose response too complex to establish • Interpretation should be based on: • Types and relative concentrations compared to outdoors or non-complaint/non-affected areas • Identification of “signature organisms” for water damaged building materials

  22. Common Testing Mistakes 4.Too Little or Too Much Concern Relative to “Signature” Organisms • Fungi associated with water-damaged building should incite remediation and/or additional investigation • Examples • Stachybotrys • Penicillium • Aspergillus • Acremonium • Trichoderma

  23. Common Testing Mistakes 5. Reliance on One Type of Air Sample • Two Common Methods for Air Samples • Spore trap • Measures Countable spores • Example: Air-O-Cell cassette • Culturable • Measures organisms that will grow in a selected culture media • Example: Andersen impact sampler

  24. Air Samples • Countable Spores • Enumeration only • Identify some genera • Cannot differentiate species • Can identify some particles and pollen • Can underestimate if high particulate matter present • Immediate results • Culturable Fungi • and Bacteria • Enumeration • Identification of genus and species • Necessary for profile comparisons • Can underestimate • Selective media • Samples must culture

  25. Spore trap results Inside 2000 c/m3 Penicillium/Aspergillus Outdoors 2000 c/ m3 Penicillium/Aspergillus Do not know if Penicillium or Aspergillus is present Could have Penicillium inside and Aspergillus outside, which would indicate an indoor source Could be the same indoors, which would suggest outdoors is the source Culturable Samples Inside 500 cfu/m3 Aspergillus versicolor 1500 cfu/m3 Penicillium chrysogenum Outside 500 cfu/m3 Aspergillus versicolor 1500 cfu/m3 Aspergillus fumigatus Apparent indoor source of Penicillium chrysogenum Example of Inconclusive Testing

  26. Common Testing Mistakes 6.Failure to Collect Air Samples Under “Normal” Operating or Living Conditions • Can produce ‘false negative” • Documentation of normal conditions could include: • Quiescent sampling • Semi-aggressive • Aggressive

  27. Common Testing Mistakes 7. Failure to design a well thought out sampling strategy • Testing should be conducted to answer a question (hypothesis) • Sufficient samples must be collected to evaluation the hypothesis • A poorly designed sampling plan with too few samples can raise more questions than it answers

  28. Summary • Indoor mold amplification is undesirable and should be avoided. • Air sampling for mold is prone to false negatives and should only be conducted if a well designed plan is developed to answer a specific question • Sampling is only one piece of the puzzle. Visual inspection, building history, and patient history are important to a case.

  29. CONSENSUS DOCUMENTS • Bioaerosols: Assessment and Control • American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), 1999 • Guidelines on Assessment and Remediation of Fungi in Indoor Environments • New York City Department of Health, 2,000 • IICRC S500, Standard and Reference Guide for Professional Water Damage Restoration • Institute of Inspection Cleaning and Restoration Certification, 1999 • Mold Remediation in Schools and Commercial Buildings • US EPA, 2001

  30. New Testing Methodologies • VOC (Volatile Organic Compounds • Mycotoxins • Endotoxins • Particle Counters • PCR

  31. RESOUNDING CONCLUSIONS • A Poorly Developed Sampling Plan Can Raise More Questions Than It Answers • An Investigator Can Not State That Something Is Not Present Unless Appropriate Testing Is Conducted

More Related