340 likes | 486 Views
2. National concern. Assisting all students to make a smooth transition from school to college and work is a growing national concern.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
E N D
1. 1 Dual Credit: Definitions, Policies, and Strategies Debra D. Bragg, Professor
College and Careers Transition Initiative
March 6, 2005
2. 2 National concern Assisting all students to make a smooth transition from school to college and work is a growing national concern.
3. 3 Long-time concern “It is now undeniably clear that many students in the US need help making the transition from high school to postsecondary learning opportunities... State and federal policy makers recognize this, educators recognize it, and so does the general public.”
4. 4 Transition to College 95% of high school (HS) seniors expect to go to college
70% HS seniors expect a Bachelor’s degree
66% HS seniors enroll in college within 1 year of grad (up from 50% in 1985)
US Department of Education (2001)
5. 5 Social Influences Parents and peers encourage college
Teachers and counselors - mixed messages
K-12 still actively “sorts” students into tracks
46% HS students take college prep
HS CTE students take less college prep, but depends on state and program of study
6. 6 College & Upward Mobility We know upward mobility is tied to college
Real benefits accrue for 2-year and 4-year college attendance or credentials, BUT…
The “achievement gap” for minority and low income populations creates unequal opportunity for college = “underserved student population”
7. 7 “A Shared Agenda” Pathways to College Network (2004) “If we are to attain the goal of being a truly integrated society, we must ensure that the large numbers of underserved students in America achieve at the postsecondary level.”
“Today’s world demands that educational systems at all levels support high achievement and the development of life-long learning skills for all students, regardless of background…”
8. 8 Education Pipeline (Mortenson, 2000)
9. 9 College Enrollment by Income (Mortenson, 2001)
10. 10 College Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity (NCES, 2003)
11. 11 BA Attainment by Income (Mortenson, 2001)
12. 12 New Research Academic Pathways to Access and Student Success (APASS)
Funded by
Lumina Foundation for Education
13. 13 APASS Goals Identify “Academic Pathways” in the 50 states and determine:
Special efforts to reach underserved students
Policy support (state, federal, local)
Thesis: K-12 academic preparation is the strongest predictor of college entry and success… “The true bottom-line is gaining better understanding of academic preparation structures and strategies geared toward enhancing students’ opportunity-to-learn” (Cliff Adelman)
14. 14 “Academic Pathway” means… Boundary-spanning curriculum and supporting organizational structures designed to link and align rigorous K-12 education with postsecondary education (2-year and 4-year college and university) to facilitate student transition to college.
15. 15 Academic Pathways Dual credit/dual enrollment
Early or Middle College high schools
AP, CLEP, International Baccalaureate (IB)
Tech Prep
Bridge programs
Distance learning – “Virtual Schools/Colleges”
High Schools that Work (HSTW)
Career Academies
GEAR UP
16. 16 Underserved Groups Racial/Ethnic Minority (by group)
Low Income
Low Achieving
English as a Second Language
Immigrant
First Generation
Youth with Disability
Male/Female
Urban/Rural
Incarcerated youth
Special populations
Pregnant/Parenting Teen
Other
17. 17 APASS Inventory Methods January 2004-August 2005
125+ telephone interviews with all 50 states
150+ informants (min. 2 per state)
Over 800 staff hours reviewing websites and documentation
Create state profiles
Develop APASS website
Site visit 4-6 states
Write summary reports
18. 18 50 State Results
19. 19 Dual Credit = Core Element
20. 20 Focus on Dual Credit (DC)/ Dual Enrollment (DE) Dual credit (DC): Students receive both high school and college credit for a college-level class successfully completed.
Dual or Concurrent enrollment (DE): Students are dually or concurrently enrolled (and taking some college-level classes) in high school and college. They may or may not receive high school credit for the college classes.
21. 21 Articulated Credit Articulated credit (AC) aligns secondary and postsecondary courses to allow students who successfully complete selected high school courses to be eligible for credit in the corresponding college course in the future
Deferred credit or credit in escrow
Credit by proficiency/exam
Tech Prep credit
22. 22 Participation in DC/DE Offered in all 50 states with over ˝ million students nationwide, not counting AP (2001)
Illinois >25,500
Utah >23,000
Kentucky >17,000
Washington >14,000
Oregon >14,000
Minnesota >7000
Nebraska >4500
North Dakota >650
23. 23 DC/DE – Who’s Served? 10 states say “advanced or high achieving” students or “academic enrichment”
28 states say they do make special efforts
Student groups by # states:
Low income (9)
Racial/ethnic minority (8)
CTE/Tech Prep students (4)
First generation (4)
Low achieving (3)
Rural (3)
Incarcerated youth (3)
24. 24 DC/DE Policies (CCRC, 2004) Of the 50-states:
76% - formal state policy
58% - student eligibility criteria
36% - FTE/ADA funding
35% - dual enrollment opportunities
26% - course content
24% - instructor qualifications
25. 25 DC/DE Funding(CCRC, 2004) Most extensive state policy – neither HS or CC lose ADA/FTE, student tuition costs born by state (AZ, IL, MN)
Most limited state policy - both HS and CC lose ADA/FTE, no support for student tuition (MI, GA, OH, NC)
Many states somewhere in the middle - CA, CO, MO, TX, VA, WA, WY
26. 26 Reasons for Growth Seen as solution for:
Disconnected curriculum
Senioritis
High school dropout
College remediation and attrition
Rising cost of college
Extended time to degree
Etc.
27. 27 Literature Suggests: DC students (relative to peers):
Require less remediation
Are retained to 2nd year at higher rate
Earn more credits toward the degree
Higher grades (?)
Major problem: Most studies do not control for student academic ability/performance
28. 28 CC&B Results (Kim, 2005) Controlling for academic ability/performance:
Articulated CTE credit - positive impact on college readiness in reading and writing
Academic dual credit - positive impact on college readiness in math
AP - positive impact on college readiness in reading, writing and math
All approaches - negative impact on total college-level credit hours earned. Students having articulated CTE credit best retention, but transfer is an issue!
29. 29 Decision Areas Dual Credit in Illinois: Making it Work, E. Barnett (2004) Program approach
Organization and funding
Course delivery
Student selection & guidance
Faculty selection
Quality assurance
Relationships with HS
Credit award and transfer
Marketing and PR
Monitoring & evaluation
30. 30 Strategies Community college play leadership role
Use liaisons at CC and HS levels
Communicate policy and process clearly to all audiences, including students and parents
Engage counseling and advising staff – be sure they understand
Think carefully about students to be served
Establish clear and meaningful student selection criteria – set the “bar” fairly
31. 31 More Strategies Hire faculty who meet HS and adjunct teaching requirements
Involved faculty offer training and on-going mentoring of peers
Make course/instructional materials accessible (book rental program)
Visible and credible quality control
Facilitate transfer from the ‘get-go’
32. 32 Where do we go
from here?
33. 33 APASS website http://www.apass.uiuc.edu/
34. 34 For more info Office of Community College Research and Leadership, University of Illinois
E-mail: dbragg@uiuc.edu
Web: http://occrl.ed.uiuc.edu/
Phone: 217-244-9390