1 / 61

Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils. Prospecting and Exploration. What we’re looking for is subtle Most rocks, even the most favorable, do not have extractable resources 1% of mineral occurrences are worth detailed study 1% of those are worth drilling 1% of those are worth mining.

dalmar
Download Presentation

Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

  2. Prospecting and Exploration • What we’re looking for is subtle • Most rocks, even the most favorable, do not have extractable resources • 1% of mineral occurrences are worth detailed study • 1% of those are worth drilling • 1% of those are worth mining

  3. Geologic Map of Wisconsin

  4. Gravity Map of Wisconsin

  5. Gravity • Mean value about 9.8 m/sec2 = 1 g • About 0.5% smaller at equator than poles • Map unit = gal (for Galileo) = 1 cm/sec2 • Mean gravity = 980 gal • Maps contour in mgal = 10-6 g • Modern gravimeters can detect .001 mgal variations (= 1 ppb) • A gravimeter is essentially a spring balance.

  6. Gravimeter

  7. Gravity Maps • Gravity varies by latitude due to earth’s equatorial bulge and centrifugal force • Need altitude correction = 0.3 mgal/m = 3 x 10-7 g/m • Altitude only correction = Free-Air Anomaly Map • Correct for mass between you and sea level = Bouguer Anomaly Map • Correct for variations in thickness of crust = Isostatic Anomaly Map

  8. Colorado Bouguer Map

  9. Colorado Isostatic Map

  10. Chicxulub Impact Basin Gravity Map

  11. Gravity Mapping • Simple corrections for latitude and altitude • Density = Lithology • Can sense deep into crust • Gravimeters are basically sensitive spring balances • Fragile • Prone to drift • Discrete data points • Labor intensive, low detail

  12. Magnetic Map of Wisconsin

  13. Geomagnetism • Magnetic field of Earth = 40 microtesla = 40,000 nt • Varies from 25 to 70 mt • Non-axial • Not centered on the earth • Varies over a human lifetime

  14. Overall Magnetic Field of Earth

  15. MAGSAT Map of Earth

  16. Magnetic Mapping • Corrections are complex and time variable • No simple correlation with lithology • Can’t sense deep into crust because heat destroys magnetism • Magnetism is electromagnetic phenomenon • Instruments can be purely electronic • Can record continuously • Can be extremely detailed

  17. Gravity and Magnetic Mapping • Greater sensing depth • Complex corrections • Greater detail possible

  18. Gravity and Magnetic Mapping

  19. SatelliteImage of Wisconsin

  20. Grand Canyon

  21. Lake Vostok, Antarctica

  22. Copper Mines, Iran

  23. Saline Valley, California

  24. The Moon

  25. Mercury

  26. Mars False Color View

  27. Remote and Not So Remote Sensing

  28. Telling Minerals Apart

  29. Martian Minerals?

  30. Absorption Bands

  31. Radar Interferometry: L’Aquila, Italy, 2009

  32. Haiti, 2010

  33. Haiti, 2010

  34. Damage, Port au prince

  35. Chile, 2010

  36. Chile 2010

  37. Chile, 2010, GPS

  38. Ice Flow, Antarctica

  39. Kilauea, Hawaii

  40. Venus

  41. Topography of Venus

  42. Radar Map of Venus

  43. Radar Map of Venus

  44. Venus Gravity Maps

  45. Gravity Map of Mars

  46. Titan

  47. Radar Image, Titan

More Related