1 / 36

Soil Phosphorus Tests in the North-Central Region

Soil Phosphorus Tests in the North-Central Region. Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University. Basics of Soil Testing. A relative measurement of nutrient sufficiency for plants. Tests measure an amount of nutrient that is proportional to the amount actual available for plants.

dalit
Download Presentation

Soil Phosphorus Tests in the North-Central Region

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Soil Phosphorus Tests in the North-Central Region Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University

  2. Basics of Soil Testing • A relative measurement of nutrient sufficiency for plants. • Tests measure an amount of nutrient that is proportional to the amount actual available for plants. • Many P tests are used and measure different amounts of P. The amount measured has no meaning by itself and cannot by used without calibration.

  3. Field Correlation/Calibration • Gives a meaning to a soil test result. • Establish critical concentration ranges for different crops and soils. • Establish probability of response for different test results. • Determine fertilization rates when test is below a critical range: interpretation classes or continuous formulas.

  4. Soil Testing for P • Bray-1 and Olsen have been extensively used across the North-Central region. • Bray-1 underestimates plant-available P in many calcareous soils. • Both tests have been used with a colorimetric determination method, intensity of a blue color. • Colorimetric methods measure orthophosphate P.

  5. Common Extractive Solutions • Bray-1: HCl + NH4F • Olsen or bicarbonate: NaHCO3 (pH 8.5). • Mehlich-3: CH3COOH + HNO3 + NH4F + EDTA NH4NO3 + EDTA

  6. Iowa Field Calibrations: Bray & Olsen Bray-1 Olsen

  7. The Mehlich-3 Extractant • M3 extractant began to be used in the NC Region for P, K, Ca, Mg, and some micronutrients during the late 1990s. • The NCR-13 committee included the M3 among procedures for P, K, Ca, and Mg. • Iowa published field calibrations for M3-K and the M3-P colorimetric in 1999. • M3- P is similar to Bray-1 P, except in some high-pH soils.

  8. Bray-1 Vs M3 and Soil pH

  9. Bray-1 and M3 in Manured Soils

  10. D. Leikam Kansas: M3 vs Bray

  11. Wisconsin: M3 vs Bray L. Bundy

  12. Iowa Field Calibrations: Bray and M3 Bray-1 M3 Colorimetric

  13. Now Comes the ICP! • Some labs began using ICP (inductively coupled plasma) for the M3 test. • ICP measures uses a very hot flame that breaks down all compounds. • Great confusion! ICP measures more P than the colorimetric method whatever extractant is used. • But problem with M3 because it is used for several nutrients.

  14. ICP Measures Organic P - Minnesota

  15. ICP Measures Organic P - Iowa

  16. M3-ICP vs M3-Colorimetric or Bray

  17. D. Leikam Kansas: M3 ICP vs Colorimetric

  18. Iowa: M3-ICP vs M3-Colorimetric Relative Absolute

  19. D. Leikam Kansas: M3 Colorimetric/ICP Ratio

  20. MN: M3-ICP vs M3-Colorimetric

  21. Iowa: M3 ICP & colorimetric and OM Relative Absolute But for this data set, high OM sites also had higher pH and lower P by any test.

  22. MN: M3 ICP & colorimetric and OM

  23. Iowa: M3 ICP & colorimetric and pH Relative Absolute But for this data set, high pH sites also had higher OM and lower P by any test.

  24. MN: M3 ICP & colorimetric and pH

  25. NCR-13 M3 ICP-Colorimetric Work • ICP extra P seems to be derived from soluble organic P compounds. • IA, MN, MO: No relationship with soil organic matter or manure history. • Not clear results for pH. Sometimes ICP - Colorimetric difference is smaller for high-pH soils, but often have less P. • Many public and private labs: P from ICP correlates well with colorimetric P but there is no reliable, constant factor.

  26. Iowa M3 ICP Field Calibrations

  27. Iowa M3 ICP Field Calibrations

  28. Critical Soil P Concentrations Model Bray-1 M3-Col M3-ICP ------------------- ppm P ------------------ Cate-Nelson 13 16 20 Lin-Plateau 20 21 32 Quad-Plateau 26 28 43

  29. Iowa M3 ICP & Color Interpretations Colorimetric ICP

  30. Iowa Soil-Test P Interpretations Maintenanceadjust basedon removal

  31. Four States Bray-1 P Classes Class IA IL MN NE WI - --------------------------- ppm ------------------------------ VL 0-8 na 0-5 0-5 0-7 L 9-15 na 6-11 6-15 8-12 O, M 16-20 22-32 12-15 16-24 13-18 H 21-30 32+ 16-20 25-30 19-28 NE, 8-inch sampling depth; others 6 to 7 inches Optimum, Medium: IA, IL, WI apply maintenance MN, NE starter or < maintenance

  32. EnvironmentalSoil Phosphorus Tests

  33. Dissolved P in Runoff

  34. P in Tile Drainage

  35. Soil P Testing in the NC Region • No problem with Bray and Olsen tests in the NC Region. Known high pH issue. • M3-COL is similar to Bray in acid or neutral soils, better in IA high-pH soils. Some different results in WI. • M3-COL and M3-ICP are different soil tests!! Getting M3-COL or Bray from M3-ICP is a very risky business. • Base interpretations on calibrations! • Used in P indices for NMPs or MMPs.

More Related