People v . Bruno. Issue: whether the Government will be able rightfully permitted to introduce evidence against Bruno. What is the Rule?. 4 th Amendment Search and Seizure . Why the need for a Warrant. Court doesn’t want “only in the discretion of the police.”. Not incident to arrest
Issue: whether the Government will be able rightfully permitted to introduce evidence against Bruno
Search and Seizure
Court doesn’t want “only in the discretion of the police.”
Not incident to arrest
Not hot pursuit
Not pursuant to the suspect’s consent.
Map, with Writing
Name of School
Headlines cut out of magazines
Movies about kidnapping
Turner wearing a blond wig and glasses
Writing – 1 million to much? Time to get a million, Space, and extradition treaties with US.
“had an abundance of information and time to swear out a valid [search] warrant, he failed to do so.” – search and seizure unlawful
Does Bruno have any defenses for being arrested for having a controlled substance (chlorofom), if so what are they?
Can Officers Alvarez and Thomas follow Bruno from the time he left his job at a drug store near where the Boston’s lived, or does that violate any of Bruno’s rights?
Did Tommy and Mary expose themselves in violation of the municipal ordinance on lewd conduct? Why or Why Not?
What of all the pieces of the evidence is the most damaging piece of evidence against Bruno, and his girlfriend? Why?
Did the police need a Search Warrant?
At what point should a Warrant Search have been issued?