1 / 25

A Snapshot of Faculty Attitudes and DL Issues in Kentucky

A Snapshot of Faculty Attitudes and DL Issues in Kentucky. Carol Wilson Western Kentucky University carol.wilson@wku.edu Sloan-C International Conference on Asynchronous Learning Networks Nov. 14 - 16, 2003. Kentucky Virtual University.

dafydd
Download Presentation

A Snapshot of Faculty Attitudes and DL Issues in Kentucky

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Snapshot of Faculty Attitudes and DL Issues in Kentucky Carol Wilson Western Kentucky University carol.wilson@wku.edu Sloan-C International Conference on Asynchronous Learning Networks Nov. 14 - 16, 2003

  2. Kentucky Virtual University • created by the Kentucky Postsecondary Act of 1997 • designed as a cooperative effort of the KY IHEs • regional universities will be the primary developers and deliverers of programs

  3. The state institutions • are mandated to supply courses to the KYVU, • are responsible for • training and • rewarding faculty who engage in DL.

  4. Faculty Development Work Group (CPE): design a faculty development initiative to prepare the faculty of KY to participate in the programs of the KYVU.

  5. Purpose of the Study Investigate DL in higher ed.: • attitudes about DL issues • faculty proficiency in IT skills • institutional barriers and support for DL.

  6. Data Collection • mining of documents • faculty development needs assessment survey N=1500 faculty, 9 KY institutions • interviews with 60+ administrators and faculty

  7. Research Problem Nationally the professoriate might be: • unwilling and unpreparedto deliver DL • unrewarded for their efforts • unsupported by the university infrastructure.

  8. Continuum Where do faculty fall? • willing ……….. unwilling • well prepared …… unprepared • equitably rewarded ... unrewarded • well supported …. unsupported.

  9. Results: Instructional Efficacy • Faculty Neutral whether DL would • provide quality instruction • provide student-centered interactive learning • enhance communication with students

  10. Results: Personal Learning According to faculty, DL is the least effective mode of instruction for faculty development.

  11. Results: DL Neutral Viewed as a general concept, the respondents had a more positive attitude toward instructional technology (4.05) than distance learning (3.53).

  12. However, The means decreased as the questions moved from • the general concept to • departmental involvement to • personal involvement.

  13. Results: Prepared in Tech • Report meet most ISTE tech performance standards • Moderately comfortable with: • installing software • using a spreadsheet and a presentation tool

  14. Reported frequently used in their courses: • e-mail (66%) • students used electronic resources (57%) • classroom presentations (42%) • course web-site (32%).

  15. Results: Preparation in On-line Instruction Moderately comfortable with the "universal" instructional techniques of writing learning objectives and applying learning models. But

  16. Uncomfortable • with the instructional techniques associated with distance education, e.g., • modifying existing course for DL or • developing effective online activities.

  17. Results: Intrinsically motivated • to use instructional technology • to improve student learning.

  18. Results: Under time pressure and Unrewarded for their work with instructional technology

  19. Technology Use Valued technology-use was perceived to have value But it was not rewarded in yearly reviews or promotion/tenure decisions

  20. Results: Feeling under-supportedby the university infrastructure. Paradox • IHE investing $$$, YET • Faculty feel unrewarded. • Human support often missing

  21. Conclusions: Faculty are • not rebellious, unwilling to use DL, • are intrinsically motivated, BUT • unsure of the efficacy of DL • unconvinced of personal involvement

  22. They report • under time pressure • prepared for most ISTE standards • but under-prepared in online instruction • feel unrewarded for IT and • under-supported by university.

  23. Suggestions for Policy Vertically integrated policy framework involving • the central administration, • deans, • department chairs/heads, • faculty

  24. Vertically integrated policy to define the role and importance of instructional technology & DL. Systemic policy change is required

  25. Supportive institutional environment • training, • time to participate, • technical support, and • incentives, reward/recognition for participation

More Related