Loading in 2 Seconds...
Loading in 2 Seconds...
Merton Youth Partnership Youth Transformation threats and resilience. Threats. The money Council Youth Budget 2010 – 11 - 1.8 million [600k grants] – universal, targeted and commissioned. Savings 2011 – 12 that impacted on wider youth services £330k
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
+ £100k Youth Capital + Summer Uni ended + connexions savings+ other grant funds stopping outside the council....
This total savings 2011 – 14 31% - i.e. 1/3 less.
Well established youth partnership - MYP
Strong commissioning model – young people led - ofsted example of good practise!!
Quality assurance scheme - 2nd Cohort
4 year rise in participation across LA and commissioned youth sector
Young people more positive – although always room for improvement!
New web site for young people being promoted across schools – Young Merton – advertising what you do
Loads of thriving youth projects.
National Citizens Scheme - “blueprint” for future of youth services – local small providers supported by large national organisations.
Big society bank
New all age careers service, Wolf review - social mobility
Government to consult on a youth paper in summer - focus on outcomes achieved not numbers seen; payment by results - such as public health outcomes and prevention of custody
Youth Sector has been too reliant on govt grant it needs to be “more varied” and “more sustainable” – new partnerships are required.
Transform youth services by “capital and intellectual resources pooled” Tim Loughton 2011
Build on our success in partnership provision
Build on our success in young people’s decision making
Expand our commission process to include council provision.
Build on effective links between open access and targeted work “targeted provision, but open to all”.
What skills and aptitudes are we trying to develop –what are our outcomes? Accreditation that leads to employability; individual progress
How do we? - open up all provision to challenge / create new potential partnership arrangements?
Increase the role of young people.
Increase the links between local provision and local stakeholders – building more community ownership, flexibility, bring in new funding address cohesion issues between young people and adults?
but keeping flexible quality provision – linked to targeted agencies working to a common set of “behaviour / well being “outcomes”?
MYP Executive – as a project group
Time scale – by Nov!! For the recommissioning; by April for savings...
MYP - Youth Conference – FPM social enterprises; - MYP meetings
New Creative Partnerships
areas and provision
Needs analysis : areas and groups
Design Principles: outputs and outcomes
Decommission / recommission/ recontract
prioritise areas of challenge
Challenge process :
Scoping the spec and funding
Commission – decision making
involving young people
new youth partnerships
Role of young people
Questions on transformation
Design Principles consultation.
The target age group will be young people aged 11-19 yrs, with an extension to those aged 11 in year 6 of primary school and young people aged up to 24 with learning disabilities.
The service will be mainly aimed at London Borough of Merton Residents and their close friendship groups, as well as young people attending education, training or working in Merton.
Most provision will be open access (universal) and open to any young person seeking to participate in Merton Youth Provision. However some services should be specialist so that those young people, who would find it hard to access general provision, are ensured that they have access to specialist provision.
These would include young people with disabilities and young people from new and emergent ethnic minority communities in the Borough. Supporting organisations in their transition into integration and build community cohesion into their programme delivery .[r1]