1 / 6

Why are smart contract security audits required_

Smart contract security audits can assist you in identifying any system vulnerabilities. It gives you the chance to correct these problems before someone wishing you harm does so and undoes what you have accomplished.

cyphershield2022
Download Presentation

Why are smart contract security audits required_

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Why are smart contract security audits required?

  2. Why are security audits for smart contracts necessary? Smart contract security audits can assist you in identifying any system vulnerabilities. It gives you the chance to correct these problems before someone wishing you harm does so and undoes what you have accomplished. With this new technology, though, it's possible that you're not clear what a smart contract audit is, why one is important, or whether you truly need one. Check out a few intriguing smartphone ideas for the near future. What is smart contract auditing? A "Smart Contract Audit" is a thorough and methodical examination of the code that a smart contract employs to interact with a cryptocurrency or blockchain. Finding defects, technical problems, and security flaws in the code is done using this technique. It enables experts in smart contract security audit to offer changes. Smart contract audits are frequently required since the majority of smart contracts deal with priceless commodities and financial assets. Smart contract audits cannot absolutely guarantee that the contract is free of defects or errors. It does, however, guarantee that the smart contract is safe following a technical expert's review.

  3. Cyber-attacks on Blockchain networks and smart contracts Before they be used in actual attacks, vulnerabilities in the blockchain must be found and fixed by developers. The two fundamental tactics that hostile organisations utilise to carry out effective assaults are bait and response attacks. A complete grasp of Blockchain network smart contracts and related components, such as cross-chain and side-chain wallets, as well as familiarity with numerous protocols are required for the second, more complicated technique. The first tactic makes use of deceptive social engineering techniques, such persuading the victim to transmit cryptocurrency to the attacker. Because they handle or exchange substantial amounts of money, smart contracts become attractive targets for malicious cyber assaults. Significant sums of money can be stolen through simple programming flaws. Three prominent Blockchain assaults are listed below.

  4. Wormhole Bridge The Wormhole Bridge breach is now the second-largest attack against the cryptocurrency sector. Wormhole, a well-known link between the Ethereum and Solana chains, lost almost $320 million as a result of the attack. Utilizing a bridge flaw, the attacker took 120,323 Ether, or XNUMX million dollars. The attacker created about 20,000 hours' worth of Ethereum on the Solana Blockchain, which was valued $325 million at the time of the hack. He did it by pretending to be a genuine signer on a deal without offering any guarantees. Finance CREAM The hacker took advantage of a flaw in Cream Finance's flash loan agreement to get Ethereum tokens valued about $130 million. Oracle Cream's methodology and technology for determining asset values have serious flaws.

  5. Using the CREAM Finance platform's smart contracts' restrictions on price computation, the attacker changed the price of the pool of yUSD used as collateral, changing the 1 yUSD wager into $2. As a result, Cream Finance reports that the attacker's initial $1.5 million yUSD investment has increased by twofold. The hacker then leveraged a $XNUMX billion profit to drain the project's overall liquidity by converting his yUSD investment at Cream Finance into $3 billion. Reverse Finance First, the attacker removed 901 ETH from Tornado Cash, the Ether Mixer. The attacker then used SushiSwap's liquidity pools for INV/WETH and INV/DOLA to convert them to INV. Both organisations utilised the price of Oracal Keep3r, which tracked the cost of INV, to increase the cost of INV. As a consequence, the value of Inverse Finance's INV increased, making it possible for the attacker to get a $15.6 million INV-backed loan in ETH, WBTC, YFI, and DOLA.

  6. Security evaluations of smart contracts are necessary for both DeFi and NFT As examples, a number of well-known projects that had financial disasters were used to highlight the pressing need for a comprehensive audit of smart contracts. Even if you carry out a smart contract audit, there is no guarantee that the smart contract will always be immune to attack. You can now see how NFT tokens operate to stop art theft the best manner possible.

More Related