1 / 17

Study of plastic scintillator quenching factors

Study of plastic scintillator quenching factors. Lea Reichhart, IOP Glasgow, April 2011. www.amcrys-h.com. 1/17. Quenching factor. What is quenching? Difference in light yield output between nuclear recoils and electron recoils. Energy dependent! Theoretical/semi-empirical approaches:

cynthiathompson
Download Presentation

Study of plastic scintillator quenching factors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Study of plastic scintillator quenching factors Lea Reichhart, IOP Glasgow, April 2011 www.amcrys-h.com 1/17

  2. Quenching factor What is quenching? • Difference in light yield output between nuclear recoils and electron recoils. • Energy dependent! Theoretical/semi-empirical approaches: • Lindhard factor -> energy dissipation into atomic motion or heat • Birks factor kB -> dependence on energy and stopping power dE/dr 2/17

  3. Motivation • Important in situations of low energy neutron detection • Extremely limited data below 1 MeV nuclear recoil energy [2] D.L. Smith, R.G. Polk, T.G. Miller, Nucl. Instr. And Meth. 64 (1968) 157-166. [3] G.V., N.R .Kolb, R.E. O’RiellyPywell, Nucl. Instr. And Meth. In Phys. Res. A 368 (1996) 745-749. [1] V.I. Tretyak, Astroparticle Phys. 33 (2010) 40-53. 3/17

  4. Measurements/Method/Simulation • UPS-923 A Polystyrene (C8H8) based plastic scintillator • 100 cm long, 15 cm thick parallelepiped • PMT model 9302KB from ETEL AmBe/252Cf sources Scintillator bar • Low background measurement • 2850 m water-equivalent • Reduction of cosmic ray muon flux by a factor of ~106 4/17

  5. Measurements/Method/Simulation Scintillator module Production of secondary optical photons, photoelectron count at photo-cathode of PMT Incl. thermal neutron scattering model <4eV  increase of neutron capture by 20% TAL = 100 cm Light yield: 7 phe/keV PMT quantum efficiency: 30% 5/17

  6. Calibration 137Cs ADC channel to photoelectron conversion with 137Cs spectrum at high k-a bias gain (1100V) on PMT 60Co Effects from electronics (after-pulsing, ion feedback, pre-amplifiers,..) visible in MAESTRO data -> more dominant at high rates 6/17

  7. Gamma-ray contamination (from neutron sources) Simulations: Const. gamma-ray spectrum 0-10 MeV attenuation factor for 14 cm of lead shielding: (2.6+0.5)*10-5  negligible contributions to background from neutron sources Experimentally: No increase above background from 60Co source Variation of lead shield by +0.5 cm does not have a significant effect on the end result – included in error 7/17

  8. Neutron spectra 252Cf Moderation through shielding AmBe Source spectra scaled – AmBe by 10-3, 252Cf by 10-2 8/17

  9. QF a constant value? AmBe Diverges at ~13 phe Capture peak 9/17

  10. QF energy dependent 252Cf 252Cf 10/17

  11. QF energy dependent 252Cf 11/17

  12. QF energy dependent Minimizing overall Chi2/ndf (2-35 phe): AmBe 1.56 252Cf 1.69 12/17

  13. Birks factor, kB • Quenching factor only depends on the stopping power dE/dr of a specific particle in a specific material (shape of the curve) • Scaled by kB factor -> (should be) independent of particle species [1] V.I. Tretyak, Astroparticle Phys. 33 (2010) 40-53. 13/17

  14. 12C nuclei fraction • < 500 keV: 12C ~30% of overall • At 350 keV: 12C ~10% • towards 0 keV: 12C raises up to almost 50% Sign. lower QF values Example for pseudocumene [1] Significant contribution from carbon nuclei to nuclear recoil energy depositions at energies below 500 keV 14/17

  15. Birks factor, kB • kB factor from best fit to the data: 0.01045 g MeV-1 cm-2 • Good agreement with theory above ~350 keV – below steep drop 15/17

  16. Conclusions • Constant quenching factor is only a good approximation for high recoil energies. • Energy dependent quenching factor measurements down to 100 keV. • kB factor of 0.01405 g MeV-1 cm-2 obtained for best fit to data points above 350 keV. • Measured energy dependent quenching factor falls very rapidly below 350 keV. • Contributions to the overall quenching at low energies not sufficient described by Birks model • Further investigation of low energy electron recoil efficiencies 16/17

  17. Special thanks to: The ZEPLIN-III Collaboration The Boulby Team SKY Experiment 17/17

More Related