Lecture 15 investment banking and secondary markets
Download
1 / 23

Lecture 15: Investment Banking and Secondary Markets - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 231 Views
  • Updated On :

Lecture 15: Investment Banking and Secondary Markets. Robert Shiller Ecnomics Department Yale University. Glass-Steagall Act 1933.

Related searches for Lecture 15: Investment Banking and Secondary Markets

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Lecture 15: Investment Banking and Secondary Markets' - cyndi


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Lecture 15 investment banking and secondary markets l.jpg

Lecture 15: Investment Banking and Secondary Markets

Robert Shiller

Ecnomics Department

Yale University


Glass steagall act 1933 l.jpg
Glass-Steagall Act 1933

  • The modern concept of “Investment Bank” was created in the Glass-Steagall act (Banking Act of 1933). Glass Steagall separated commercial banks, investment banks, and insurance companies.

  • Carter Glass, Senator from Virginia, believed that commercial banks securities operations had contributed to the crash of 1929, that banks failed because of their securities operations, and that commercial banks used their knowledge as lenders to do insider trading of securities.


Investment banks l.jpg
Investment Banks

  • Bulge bracket firms: First Boston, Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Salomon Brothers, Lehman Brothers.

  • Traditionally were often partnerships, but partnership form is disappearing.


Controversy over glass steagall l.jpg
Controversy over Glass Steagall

  • Prof. George Benston showed that unregulated banks have lower failure rate.

  • Other countries (Germany, Switzerland) have always allowed universal banking

  • In 1990s, regulators nibbled away at Glass Steagall by allowing commercial banks to engage in certain securities operations


Graham leach act 1999 l.jpg
Graham-Leach Act 1999

  • President Clinton November 1999 signs Graham-Leach Bill which rescinded the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933.

  • Consumer groups fought repeal of Glass-Steagall saying it would reduce privacy. Graham-Leach calls for a study of the issues of financial privacy


Mergers among commercial banks investment banks insurance companies l.jpg
Mergers among Commercial Banks, Investment Banks & Insurance Companies

  • Travelers’ Group (insurance) and Citicorp (commercial bank) 1998 to produce Citigroup, on anticipation that Glass-Steagall would be rescinded. Brokerage Smith Barney

  • Chase Manhattan Bank (commercial bank) acquires JP Morgan (investment bank) (2000) for $34.5 billion

  • UBS Switzerland buys Paine Webber (brokerage) 2000

  • Credit Suisse buys Donaldson Lufkin Jenrette (investment bank) 2000


Underwriting of securities l.jpg
Underwriting of Securities Companies

  • Issuance of shares and corporate debt

  • Seasoned issue versus IPO

  • Underwriter provides advice for issuer, distribution of securities, sharing of risks of issue, and stabilization of aftermarket.

  • Underwriter also “certifies” the issue by putting its reputation behind the issue.


Moral hazard problem mitigated by investment banks l.jpg
Moral Hazard Problem Mitigated by Investment Banks Companies

  • Firms have incentive to issue shares when they know their earnings are only temporarily high.

  • This problem can be “solved” by resorting to bank loans instead of new equity

  • Problem can also be solved by issuing security with an investment bank that has a reputation to protect.

  • Studies show that investment banks that repeatedly underprice or overprice issues suffer a market share loss afterwards.


Two basic kinds of offerings l.jpg
Two Basic Kinds of Offerings Companies

  • Bought deal (synonym: Firm commitment offering): The underwriter agrees to buy all shares that are not sold

  • Best efforts: the underwriter says that if the issue is not sold, deal collapses.


The underwriting process i l.jpg
The Underwriting Process I Companies

  • Prefiling period

  • Advise issuers about their choices

  • Agreement among underwriters, designates manager, fees

  • Filing of registration statement with SEC, begins cooling-off period

  • Cooling off period – distribute preliminary prospectus (red herring), nothing else


The underwriting process ii l.jpg
The Underwriting Process II Companies

  • Call prospective clients for indication of interest

  • Due diligence meeting between underwriter and corporation

  • Decide on offering price,

  • underwriting agreement, which underwriter sells what

  • Dealer agreement, dealers purchase from underwriters at a discount from public price

  • Effective date

  • Support the price in the aftermarket


Stabilization l.jpg
Stabilization Companies

  • A form of market manipulation by the underwriter near the time of the issue that is permitted by the SEC

  • Underwriting syndicate legally allowed to conspire to “fix” prices in market until entire issue is sold out


From a 1929 textbook on investment banking l.jpg
From a 1929 Textbook on Investment Banking Companies

“In floating any new issues of securities, therefore, the seller desires to have conditions so shaped that the price of the issue will remain stable, or perhaps it will rise slightly, during the period in which the securities are being absorbed by the market. . .establishing a favorable psychological attitude of investors. . The term manipulated market is not altogether a misnomer.”


The tombstone l.jpg
The Tombstone Companies

  • Newspaper announcements of securities’ issues, listing underwriting syndicate

  • Why called tombstones? Origin of term forgotten. Resemblance?

  • The only kind of ad allowed during cooling-off period

  • Cross between birth announcement and obituary. Tombstones appear after the securities have already been sold, but of course they are now on the market.

  • Investment bankers love to read them


Variations on the usual underwriting process l.jpg
Variations on the Usual Underwriting Process Companies

  • Auction Process (competitive bidding underwriting) various syndicates bid on the issue

  • Preemptive rights offering: existing shareholders have rights to buy issue below market value

  • Directly Public Offering (DPO): Company itself sells its securities directly to public, usually over the web. Small firms. Example: Internet Ventures, a web service provider, raised $3.8 million in 1998 by advertising the securities to its customers on the web.


Private placement l.jpg
Private Placement Companies

  • Sold only to “sophisticated” investors, exempt from SEC registration.

  • Regulation D: Private issues cannot be advertised, defines sophisticated investors

  • SEC has provided that privately placed securities cannot be sold for two years after purchase.

  • SEC Rule 144a April 1990 eliminates two-year holding period for institutions with over $100 million in the security


Initial public offerings l.jpg
Initial Public Offerings Companies

  • Price tends to jump up immediately after an IPO is issued.

  • Apparently leave money upon the table


Poor long run performance of ipos l.jpg
Poor Long-Run Performance of IPOs Companies

  • Jay Ritter, Journal of Finance, 1991

  • Although average IPO earns a +16% return on the first day, this return tends to be offset over the next three years.


Why this performance of ipos l.jpg
Why This Performance of IPOs? Companies

  • Impressario Hypothesis: analogy to sellers of tickets to concerts


Survey of ipo investors l.jpg
Survey of IPO Investors Companies

  • “Do you think that investors expect reputable underwriters to take some account of true investment value in deciding the offering price in an IPO, rather than just the price the market will bear on the day of the offering?”

    84% agree


Survey of ipo investors23 l.jpg
Survey of IPO Investors Companies

  • Have you done any calculations of what the true fundamental value of a share in the company was, and compared the price of a share with this value?

    • 80% no.