1 / 1

M ost Say U.S. Aid Doesn’t Have Good “Bang For Buck”; A Third Perceive Positive Impact On Self-Sufficiency.

cybele
Download Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Most Say U.S. Aid Doesn’t Have Good “Bang For Buck”; A Third Perceive Positive Impact On Self-Sufficiency For the most part, do you think that U.S. spending to improve health in developing countries makes people and communities in these countries more self-sufficient, less self-sufficient, or doesn’t have much impact on how self-sufficient they are? Thinking about the “bang for the buck” of U.S. spending to improve health in developing countries, that is the number of lives saved relative to the money spent. Would you say the bang for the buck of this spending is: SOURCE: Kaiser Family Foundation 2013 Survey of Americans on the U.S. Role in Global Health (conducted August 6-20, 2013)

More Related