1 / 29

TOF Reconstruction, Calibration & Test-beam Simulation

TOF Reconstruction, Calibration & Test-beam Simulation. Jiang Linli 2005/6/1 ( 13th BES Annual Meeting ). Outline. TOF reconstruction software status TOF primary calibration introduction A Geant4 simulation of the TOF model test-beam Summary.

cwright
Download Presentation

TOF Reconstruction, Calibration & Test-beam Simulation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TOF Reconstruction, Calibration & Test-beam Simulation Jiang Linli 2005/6/1 (13th BES Annual Meeting )

  2. Outline • TOF reconstruction software status • TOF primary calibration introduction • A Geant4 simulation of the TOF model test-beam • Summary

  3. Measure the flight time of charged particles. Comparing the measured time against the predicted time. Particle identification. BESIII Design TOF Physics Target : Particle ID

  4. Barrel TOF Endcap TOF

  5. TOF Reconstruction Principle

  6. TOF Reconstruction Software Feature • Experience from Belle TOF reconstruction • C++ code • Developed in the Gaudi framework (Boss)

  7. TOF Reconstruction Class Design • Main class TofRec TofSys TofGeom TofCalib TofData TofTrk TofHits • Barrel Tof BTofSysBTofMod BTofCnt BTofScint BTofPhotoTube BTofDat BTofCal • Endcap Tof ETofSys ETofMod ETofCnt ETofScint ETofPhotoTube ETofDat ETofCal

  8. TOF Reconstruction Process

  9. Current Status • All the code has been debugged in the Boss4.1, a primary version has been put to the CVS web. http://koala.ihep.ac.cn/cgibin/viewcvs.cgi/BossCvs/Reconstruction/TofRec/ • MDC reconstructed track and the extrapolated track are replaced by the MC track truth.

  10. Use MC data to do the test A example : 1000 events electron data (single track ) Reconstruction process as showed above Primary reconstructed result TOF Reconstruction Code Test Now The efficiency of the matching hits and tracks is100%

  11. χ for Different Charged Particles χ2 for Different Charged Particles

  12. TOF Primary Calibration • Time calibration • Attenuation length calibration • Effective velocity calibration

  13. Calibration Software Status • Some program has been developed • Mainly use ROOT • Use the MC data to do the calibration

  14. Time Calibration Result Before Calibration After Calibration σ=125 ps σ=83 ps

  15. Attenuation LengthCalibration Effective VelocityCalibration Bulk attenuation length: 4 m

  16. TOF Model Test-beam Setting Chart Target C :10×80mm In one room Magnet to choose particle’s momentum Pb wall T01 S1 Cherenkov MWPC 80mm×80mm T02 TOF Model S2

  17. A Geant4 Simulation of the TOF Test-beam • Geant4 is a detector simulation toolkit. • It can model the optics of the scintillator. • The processes include refraction and reflection at medium boundaries, bulk absorption and Rayleigh scattering. • It is ideal to simulate the TOF

  18. A Geant4 Simulation of the TOF Test-beam • The simulation program has been finished and used • The detector construct as the test-beam • PMT response is simulated

  19. Simulate Comparison Different thickness scintillator • BC408 4 cm • BC408 5 cm • BC408 6 cm Different reflectivity wrap material • Al r = 82 % • ESR r = 98 %

  20. Different Size Simulation Result Why 5 cm has the best time resolution?

  21. ADC Comparison 275.7±1.3 pc 282.7±1.3 pc 288.5±1.3 pc ADC 4 cm < 5 cm < 6 cm

  22. Pulse Rise Time Comparison 3.719±0.005 ns 3.736±0.005 ns 3.758±0.005 ns Rise time 4cm<5cm<6cm

  23. ADC 6 cm > 5cm > 4cm Rise time 4 cm < 5cm < 6cm So σ5cm< σ6cm< σ4cm

  24. Different Reflectivity Simulation • ESR r = 98 % • Al r = 82 % • Npe ESR > Al σAl <σESR ?

  25. ADC Comparison 282.7±1.3 pc 394.9±1.7 pc ADC Al < ESR

  26. Pulse Rise Time Comparison 3.736±0.005 ns 3.956±0.006 ns ADC ESR>Al but Rise time Al<ESR SoσAl <σESR

  27. Summary • TOF reconstruction software has been developed, and there is a primary version. • Primary TOF calibration has been done. • A Geant4 simulation of the TOF test-beam has been done, Some experiment result can be explained by simulation.

  28. Next to do • More TOF reconstruction work • A complete TOF calibration software development • Calibration methods study • More detailed simulation work

  29. Thank you !

More Related