1 / 7

Weighting

University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2012/13 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Survey Design: Some Implications for Secondary Analysis (Week 10) (Revised version). Weighting.

cwillbanks
Download Presentation

Weighting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2012/13SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard)Survey Design: Some Implications for Secondary Analysis(Week 10) (Revised version)

  2. Weighting • Sample designs often do not select respondents with a single, consistent probability of selection. • Unequal selection probabilities need to be taken into account at the analysis stage, to allow the results to be properly generalisable to the population of interest. • For a discussion of how weighting works, see pp52-53 of the online course extract by Pole and Lampard (2002), which also covers sampling more generally.

  3. Complex Samples and Sampling Error • Weighting can increase the expected amount of sampling error. • Stratification can reduce the expected amount of sampling error. • Clustering within samples can increase the expected amount of sampling error. • For a concise discussion of the above, see Section 9.4 of the online course extract by Sturgis (2008).

  4. But... • Secondary analysts frequently treat samples as if they were simple random samples. • Hence the resulting analyses may under-estimate (or over-estimate) the likely amount of sampling error. • In consequence the p-values may not be as reliable as they should be.

  5. The solution... • Recent versions of SPSS (and various other forms of software) allow one to incorporate these aspects of sample design into the analysis, and thus take account of their effect on the standard errors of estimates in an appropriate way. • In SPSS the ANALYZE/COMPLEX SAMPLES menu allows one to specify variables relating to the strata, the clusters, and the weights, in the context of a small range of techniques, including logistic regression.

  6. Merging files • Sometimes the design of a survey and/or a research focus means that a secondary analyst needs to merge data from two or more files. • For example, information on aspects of individuals’ life histories may be included in separate files. • Sometimes information about household members needs to be matched by saving subsets of members and matching them (e.g. matching individuals with their resident partners).

  7. Example • In the case of a repeated survey like the British Social Attitudes survey, different years which contain some of the same questions can be matched to facilitate examinations of social change. • In this case the relevant SPSS command is DATA / MERGE FILES / ADD CASES. • Adding additional variables (ADD VARIABLES) is slightly more demanding, as matching variables in both sources of data need to be used to properly link the information relevant to each case from the two sources.

More Related