1 / 8

Update on Whole Effluent Toxicity and Reasonable Potential Determination

Update on Whole Effluent Toxicity and Reasonable Potential Determination. Reasonable Potential.

cstokes
Download Presentation

Update on Whole Effluent Toxicity and Reasonable Potential Determination

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Update on Whole Effluent Toxicity and Reasonable Potential Determination

  2. Reasonable Potential • 40 CFR § 122.44(d)(1)(v) “(W)hen the permitting authority determines, using the procedures in paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section, toxicity testing data . . . that a discharge causes, has the reasonable potential to cause . . . an in-stream excursion above a narrative criterion within an applicable State water quality standard, the permit must contain limits for (WET).”

  3. ReasonablePotential Number of failures • Zero • One or two • Three or more

  4. Reasonable Potential • Originally, RP was not determined for WET during the application process • WET was a monitoring requirement • A TRE was required for persistent significant lethality • At the end of a TRE a WET limit could be included in the permit

  5. Sublethal Toxicity • In 2007 EPA began to objecting to permits being issued with no additional requirements for permittees that had a history of sublethal failures • Added a “trigger” for a sublethal TRE • Eventually lead to SL WET limits

  6. RP for WQBELs • A single sample approaching or in excess of the calculated limit does not automatically require a limit • Samples may be averaged • Different than federal methodology

  7. RP for WET • Zero failures, standard 5 year permit • One or two failures, 3 year permit, monthly testing after a failure • Three or more failures, 5 year permit with a WET limit, optional compliance period

  8. SUMMARY • EPA and TCEQ signed letters on December 28, 2015, agreeing to an RP policy • One or two failures will lead to 3-year permits that will require increased testing for any additional failures. • A WET limit will be included in the next permit if three or more failures occur during the 3-year permit term. • Michael Pfeil • (512) 239-4592

More Related