1 / 23

Development & validation of an absolute FSI network

Development & validation of an absolute FSI network. STATUS & NEXT STEPS SU internal meeting 16 July 2015 Solomon William KAMUGASA. Content. N ≈ 2 glass retroreflectors First FSI prototype Calibration alternatives Proposal for next generation prototype

cslinkard
Download Presentation

Development & validation of an absolute FSI network

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Development & validation of an absolute FSI network STATUS & NEXT STEPS SU internal meeting 16 July 2015 Solomon William KAMUGASA

  2. Content • N≈ 2 glass retroreflectors • First FSI prototype • Calibration alternatives • Proposal for next generation prototype • FSI multilateration redundancy study • Some simulations results based on 8 channel FSI

  3. N≈2 retroreflector Pros • Wide viewing angle • Allows good geometry • Can be machined accurately • Sphericity λ/10 Cons • Limited return intensity • N varies with λ • Difficult to get in ‘standard’ sizes

  4. Understanding N≈2 • Beam lost • Path followed by returned beam Transmitted Reflected Transmitted 0.8889 0.8889 * 0.1111 * Return intensity = Return intensity = 8.78% of emitted light

  5. N≈2 reflector constant Reflector constant

  6. N≈2 return intensities 10mm S-LAH79 Gain 8 average intensity [%] 30mm Etalon F=37.13mm collimator F=18.75mm collimator Distance [mm]

  7. S-LAH79 lateral tolerance Vertical displacement [mm] Horizontal displacement [mm]

  8. N≈2 Market study Ready for order • S-LAH79 (max diameter =10mm) • Etalon (current diameter =30mm) Awaiting info • TaFD55 can be done in diameter = 0.5”(12.7mm) • P-SF68 – awaiting slab dimensions

  9. First prototype enabling centring of optical fibre end • Aluminium spherical support • Proof of concept • Existing 1.5” supports • Distances in different directions from same point

  10. Offset definition Error caused by 0.1mm y-offset at various distances Offset definition Two possible offsets Along the beam (x-offset) Effect: significant - a constant Perpendicular to beam (y-offset) Effect: negligible - decreases with distance Distance error [nm] True distance [m]

  11. X-offset calibration X-offset residuals Number of samples Residual [µm]

  12. 1st FSI network

  13. Alternative calibration strategy • Improvement of existing strategy • More stable supports • More data • Consider more than 3 points • Cheaper (existing components) • LSA solution based on CMM and FSI measurements • Both x & y offsets determined • Based on accurate CMM measurements • More costly (CMM time)

  14. Proposal for motorised FSI prototype XY stage Ceramic sphere FSI collimator Ball bearings Support frame 3 ball bearing support Articulation arm y x • Advantages: • Easy calibration • Possible to measure distances in various directions from same point • Can be measured by QDaedalus & CMM

  15. FSI redundancy study Observations from all FSI stations to all targets Global relative redundancy [%] Number of targets • Multilateration in general = low redundancy = low reliability • Reliability can be tremendously increased by: • Using more stations &/or targets • making multiple observations along a given line of sight

  16. Optimal geometry for 4 channel FSI • 4 channel system, 1 target • Short tetrahedron with equilateral triangle base • 4th station – same x, z as target but extruded y • 4 stations minimum for LSA solution • 4 is half the number of existing channels (4 on each side of magnet) y z x xy error ellipse based on 10µm a priori sigma x z Semi minor axis sigma [µm] y Semi major axis sigma [µm] A priori sigma = 10µm Sx=Sy=Sz=9µm

  17. Fiducialisation Simulation • Object: 300×400×300mm • 8 stations, 16 targets • 6 targets on each side ‘seen’ by 4 stations each • 2 targets on top of object & 2 to the extremes ‘seen’ by all 8 stations z y x

  18. Simulation results Input: A priori stdev: 10µm Observations between most stations One entry per line of sight Total observations: 94 Unknowns: 72 6 constraints not included in calculation of precision

  19. Simulation results Input: 2 entries per line of sight Number of observations:188 Number of unknowns:72

  20. Simulation results Input: 1 entry per line of sight No observations between stations Number of observations:80 Number of unknowns:72

  21. Simulation results Input: 2 entries per line of sight No observations between stations Number of observations:160 Number of unknowns:72

  22. Next steps • Better understanding of N=2 • Prototype development • Further simulations • Measurements & inter-comparisons

  23. Thank you for your attention http://pacman.web.cern.ch/

More Related