1 / 22

Learning to Cluster Web Search Results.

Learning to Cluster Web Search Results. Hua-jun zeng Qi-cai He Zheng Chen Wei-Ying Ma Jinwen Ma. Contents. Motivation Algorithm -Salient phrases extraction -Learning to rank salient phrases •Experiments •Conclusion. Motivation.

csilla
Download Presentation

Learning to Cluster Web Search Results.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Learning to Cluster Web Search Results. Hua-jun zeng Qi-cai He Zheng Chen Wei-Ying Ma Jinwen Ma

  2. Contents • Motivation • Algorithm -Salient phrases extraction -Learning to rank salient phrases •Experiments •Conclusion

  3. Motivation • Organizing Web search results into clusters facilitates user’s quick browsing through search results. • Traditional clustering techniques don’t generate clusters with highly readable namessalient phrase

  4. Motivation(cont’d)

  5. Problem formalization and algorithm • Algorithm is composed of the four steps: 1.Search result fetching 2.Document parsing and phrase property calculation 3.Salient phrase ranking 4.Post-processing

  6. Salient Phrases extraction • Phrase Frequency/Inverted Document Frequency( TFIDF) • Phrase Length • Intra-Cluster Similarity • Cluster Entropy • Phrase Independence

  7. TFIDF w=current phrase D(w)=the set of documents that contains w N=the number of total documents f(w)=frequency caclulation

  8. Phrase Length • Generally, a longer name is preferred for users’ browsing

  9. Intra-Cluster Similarity(ICS) •First,convert documents into vectors •For each candidate cluster, we then calculate its centroid as: •ICS is calculated as the average cosine similarity between the documents and the centroid

  10. Cluster Entropy

  11. Phrase Independence • a phrase is independent when the entropy of its context is high (I,e, the left and right contexts are random enough).we use a IND to measure the independence of phrases.

  12. The IND,value for right context could be calculated similarly • The final IND value is the average of those two

  13. Learning to rank salient phrases. • Regression tries to determine the relationship between two random variables X=(x1,x2,..,xp)and y x= (TFIDF,LEN,ICS,CE,IND) • Linear Regression

  14. Experiments • Each query,200 returned documents from search engines. • Extract all n-grams from the documents where n<=3. • Use SVM_Light(2) to do support vector regression.

  15. Experiments(cont’d) • Evaluation Measure -precision(P) at top N results to measure the performance:

  16. Experiments(cont’d) • Training Data Collection

  17. Experimental Results • Property Comparison.

  18. Experimental Results (cont’d) • Learning Methods Comparison

  19. Experimental Results(cont’d) • Learning Methods Comparison. -the coefficients of one of the linear regression models as follows: Y=-0.427 +0.146 X TFIDF +0.241 X LEN -0.022 X ICS +0.065 X CE +0.266 X IND

  20. Experimental Results • In put Document Number

  21. Experimental Results(cont’d) • Coverage and Overlap

  22. Conclusion • Reformalizes the search result clustering problem as a supervised salient phrase ranking problem. • Several properties and regression models are proposed to calculate salience score for salient phrase

More Related