1 / 49

Interest/Pressure Groups

In the American Political System. Interest/Pressure Groups. U.S. Government Chapter 6. Interest Groups. Interest Group - A Definition. An interest group is a private organization of like-minded people whose goal is to influence and shape public policy.

coye
Download Presentation

Interest/Pressure Groups

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. In the American Political System Interest/Pressure Groups

  2. U.S. Government Chapter 6 Interest Groups

  3. Interest Group - A Definition • An interest group is a private organization of like-minded people whose goal is to influence and shape public policy. • Interest groups are “extra-constitutional”.

  4. The Nature of Interest Groups • Interest groups are private organizations whose members share certain views and work to shape public policy. • Interest groups exist to shape public policy Interest groups are “extra-constitutional”.

  5. Valuable Functions of Interest Groups • Interest groups raise awareness of public affairs, or issues that concern the people at large, seek to influence legislation

  6. Early Development • Date back to the time of the “Founding Fathers” • Seen as power-hungry • Believed to “promote instability, injustice, and confusion”

  7. Criticisms • Some groups have an influence far out of proportion to their size or importance • In rare cases, groups use tactics such as bribery, threats, and so on.

  8. Lobbying • Lobbying is any activity by which a group pressures legislators and influences the legislative process

  9. Types of Interest Groups • Economic • Ideological or single-issue • Public interest • Foreign policy • Governmental

  10. Types of Interest Groups • 1. Professional: Such as the American Medical Association • AMA building in Chicago

  11. Economic Groups • Business • Trade Associations • Labor • Professional Associations

  12. 2. Labor Unions

  13. 3. Business- Example:

  14. Ideological: A cause or idea such as environmental organizations, issues such as gun ownership

  15. Public Interest Groups • Motivated by such issues as the environment, safe energy, consumer protection, and good government.

  16. 4. Religious

  17. 5. Certain group of people, such as retired persons

  18. Foreign Policy Interest Groups • Concerned with the relationship between the United States and foreign nations. Examples include the Council on Foreign Relations, and AIPAC—the American-Israel Political Action Committee.

  19. Government Interest Groups • Represent the interests of government employees, as well as elected officials from state and local governments.

  20. Characteristics and Power of Interest Groups • Size and resources • Cohesiveness • Leadership • Techniques • Intensity

  21. Interest Group Techniques • Appeals to the public and mass media • Mass mailings • Influence of rule making • Litigation • Election Activities/electioneering • Forming a political party • Lobbying

  22. Growth of Interest Groups

  23. Interest Groups vs. Political Parties • Interest groups… • support candidates, but cannot nominate them • take a narrow focus on most issues • compete for influence over elected officials

  24. Interest Groups vs.Political Parties (con’t.) • Political parties… • can nominate candidates • focus on a broad range of issues to appeal to a broad range of people • compete for control of the branches of govt. to control policy making

  25. Proposals for Reform • Increasing the number of groups • Full disclosure • Increased federal and state regulations

  26. The Influence of Lobbyists • A. Who are the lobbyists • 1. Employees of associations who try to influence policy decisions and positions in the executive and especially legislative branches of government. • 2. The revolving door is the employment cycle from government to interest group.

  27. IRON TRIANGLES • 3. Iron triangles are mutually supporting relationships among interest groups, congressional committees and subcommittees, and the government agencies that share a common policy concern

  28. B. What do Lobbyists do? • 1. Provide money for congressional election campaigns • 2. A “third house” of Congress, representing people on the basis of interests • 3. Interest groups provide 2 types of info • A. political-who supports/opposes legis. • B. Substantive-impact of proposed laws

  29. Contributions regulated by the federal government that are given directly to a candidate Hard Money:

  30. Soft Money: • Previously unlimited and unregulated campaign contributions to federal candidates and the national parties • Supposedly for generic "party building" activities (ex: get-out-the-vote drives, bumper stickers, yard signs, and “issue ads"

  31. Federal Election Reform Act1974 • Created Federal Election Commission • Required disclosure • Limited amount of money that could be contributed – HARD MONEY • Individual contributions may not exceed $1000 per candidate per election per year • No foreign contributions • Soft Money unlimited

  32. Federal Election Reform Act:Unintended Consequences? • The rise of Political Action Committees • Millions of dollars of unregulated “soft money”used to finance campaigns

  33. Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002a.k.a. McCain-Feingold Bill • Ban on national parties and officeholders raising and spending “soft money” • Special interest groups can only use regulated “hard money for pro-candidate communications with increased limits • Ban on non-partisan “issue ads 60 days before election

  34. B.C.R.A (McCain-Feingold):Unintended Consequences? • Rise of 527 tax exempt groups and ads • Independent Expenditures • Laundering of “dirty money” through political parties that ends up with candidates Former House Majority Leader Tom Delay indicted for conspiracy and laundering of illegal campaign funds

  35. “527 ‘s”: • A 527 group is created primarily to influence the nomination, election, appointment or defeat of candidates for public office. • Tax-exempt organizations that engage in political activities, often through unlimited soft money contributions. • Most are advocacy groups trying to influence federal elections through voter mobilization efforts and so-called issue ads that tout or criticize a candidate's record.

  36. Campaign Finance Reform: Supreme Court Decisions • Buckley v. Valeo (1976) • McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) • Citizens United

  37. Presidential RacesTrends in Spending • 1996 • $425.7 million. • 2000 • $528.9 million. • 2004 • Receipts • George W. Bush: $367,228,801 • John F. Kerry: $328,479,245 • Overall: $880.5 million. • . • 2008 • Obama: 730 million spent http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/ • McCain: 333 million spent • FIRST BILLION DOLLAR PRESIDENTAL ELECTION

  38. Money and Politics • A. Role of political action committees(PAC’s) • 1. PACs link tow techniques of influence a. Giving $ and other political aid to politicians b. persuading office holders to act or vote “the right way” on issues. 2. PACs are categorized by the type of interst they represent

  39. B. The Growth of PACs • 1. The committee on Political Education(COPE) –model for most PACS • 2. The 1970’s brought a near revolution in the role and influence of PACs as a result of reforms increase from 150-1970 to over 4,000 today

  40. C. How PACs invest their $ • 1. Main influence is in their contribution to candidates • 2. The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 limits PACs to $5,000 per election or $10,000 per election cycle; individuals have limit of $2,000 per candidate per election • 3. Through “bundling” their contributions, PACs increase their clout with elected officials

  41. The Effectiveness of PACs • 1. Depends on the context in which money is given and received • 2. Significant relationship between PACs $ and outcome of elections • 3. PACs can help friendly incumbents with soft money contributions • “soft money”-unlimited contributions that go for “party-building” activities

  42. Curing the problem of factions: 200 years after Federalist #10 • A. Americans’ fears about the power of faction • 1. The struggle among factions is not a fair fight • 2. The interest group battle leads to great inequities because lower-income people are grossly underrepresented

  43. Fears contin… • 3. Single-issue groups have led to incoherent policies, waste, delays, inability to plan and react quickly • 4. The role of interest groups in elections has made incumbents more secure and enhanced the power of interest groups • 5. Safeguarding the value of liberty, but also threatening equality

  44. B. Federal and state regulation • 1. Federal legislation, 1925 Federal Corrupt Practices Act and the 1946 Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act—not effective • 2. FECA-Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 • 3. Problems with FECA include the soft money loophole and ineffective FEC

  45. Regulations contin… • 4. Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995-definition of lobbyist was expanded to include part-timers, whose who deal with congressional staff/executive branch agencies, and those who represent foreign-owened companies and foreign entities. • 5. Clinton signed into law legislation expanding disclosure requirements on issue ads(freedom of speech issues involved)

  46. Regulations contin… • 6. Issue advocacy ads/soft money very important in competitive elections

  47. C. The Effects of Regulation • 1. Increased the number and importance of such groups; increased PACs, especially corporate PACs • 2. PAC money goes to incumbents(committee chairs, party leaders) • 3. Disclosure of how politicians fund their campaigns is issue, also their personal finances

More Related