1 / 16

PLDI 2006 Core Dump

Overview. Papers174 submitted169 reviewed36 acceptedTutorials4 tutorialsPosters15 postersAttendanceLatest count: 304. WorkshopsTransactional Memory WorkloadsPL and Analysis for SecurityLang. Comp.

coy
Download Presentation

PLDI 2006 Core Dump

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. PLDI 2006 Core Dump Thomas Ball PLDI Program Chair

    2. Overview Papers 174 submitted 169 reviewed 36 accepted Tutorials 4 tutorials Posters 15 posters Attendance Latest count: 304

    3. Program Committee

    4. Distribution of PC Phd Ages

    5. Paper Reviewing 20 member PC 26 papers/PC member 4th expert (outside) review on most papers Physical meeting after POPL in Charleston, SC No blind review, no author feedback EasyChair system for reviewing

    6. Review Process Set 36 papers as a ceiling, not a goal First discussed top 60 papers in sort order PC members proposed other papers Discussed 90-100 papers Each paper assigned a champion

    7. Distribution of Paper Input

    8. Distribution of Paper Input

    9. Distribution of Paper Input

    10. Does Order Received Matter?

    11. Does Order Received Matter?

    12. Does Order Received Matter?

    13. History

    17. Accepting More Quality Papers Critical mass, maturity, diversity Depth and breadth It’s about community exclusive lower acceptance rate (15-20%) minor deviations lead to rejecting quality papers focus on rejection rather than acceptance inclusive higher acceptance rate (20-25%) minor deviations have less effect focus on acceptance rather than rejection

More Related