1 / 7

Jet Note 8 Meeting 7 th June 2007

Jet Note 8 Meeting 7 th June 2007. N. Davidson. E/p minimum bias update with Athena 12.0.6. 12.0.6 Data. Looked at 12.0.6.1 mc (with 1mm problem) 400k minbias events: trig1_misal1_csc11.005001.pythia_minbias.recon.AOD.v12000601 25k single pions with et=1GeV

Download Presentation

Jet Note 8 Meeting 7 th June 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Jet Note 8 Meeting 7th June 2007 N. Davidson E/p minimum bias update with Athena 12.0.6

  2. 12.0.6 Data • Looked at 12.0.6.1 mc (with 1mm problem) • 400k minbias events: • trig1_misal1_csc11.005001.pythia_minbias.recon.AOD.v12000601 • 25k single pions with et=1GeV • trig1_misal1_mc12.007421.singlepart_singlepi_et1.recon.AOD.v12000601 • 15k single pions with et=10GeV • trig1_misal1_mc12.007422.singlepart_singlepi_et10.recon.AOD.v12000601 • Will repeat with 30 micron samples and compare.

  3. Athena 11 vs 12 AODs • Number of tracks • Track Resolution

  4. Selection of isolated pions (et=1GeV) • Cuts made to remove bias in 11: • Based on tracks: • Number of tracks in event < 15 • ΔR track isolation >0.8 • >=1 B Layer Hit • Based on clusters • Cluster Multiplicity < 4 • Energy difference in cones ΔR=1.0 and Δ R=0.4 < 200MeV • Energy fraction in cone ΔR=0.2 > 0.7xEnergy in cone ΔR=0.4 • Approx. 1 track in 200 survive. (or 1 per 10 events) • For version 12: Can make harder cuts since there are more statistics • Changes: • Removed cut on number of tracks as this was ineffectual • ΔR track isolation >1.0 • magnitude of energy difference in cones ΔR=1.0 and Δ R=0.4 < 100MeV • Approx. same number of tracks surviving • E taken as the sum of caloTopoCluster energies (calibrated to EM scale only) in cone. • Cone size of ΔRcone=0.4 found to be optimal • Track extrapolated to 2nd layer of EM Calorimeter must match at least one cluster within ΔRmatch<0.05 • Require clusters and tracks in |eta|<2.4

  5. Results • An improvement to the E/p bias can be made using a smaller cone size of 0.2 • By requiring an isolated 0.2 cone get E/p comparable to 0.4 cone for the single sample SampleE/p meanRMS -minimum 0.668 0.441 bias -single pion 0.645 0.401 (after cuts) -single pion 0.631 0.409 (before cuts) Error: ±0.007 For Cone 0.2: SampleE/p meanRMS -minimum 0.647 0.441 bias (0.2) -single pion 0.645 0.401 cone 0.4 -single pion 0.639 0.401 cone 0.2 Error: ±0.007

  6. Pions with et=10GeV • approx 1/100 events have a track with 8GeV<pt<12GeV • ¾ with matching cluster within R < 0.05 • ¾ with matching 0.4 Cone Jet within R < 0.2 • Cluster based E/p before cuts • mean = 2.054 (cf. 0.861 single pion) • RMS = 1.592 (cf 0.193 single pion) • Jet based E/p before cuts • mean = 2.78 (cf 1.11 single pion) • RMS = 1.759 (cf 0.213 single pion) • Track isolation cut kills minimum bias tracks • 3k events (out of 400k -> 100 events) • More stats & work needed on this

  7. Pile-up • First look at pile-up sample (from mark) • 5.6 events • Bias to E/p scales with the sum of energy in the event. • Difficult to find events with energy sum similar to single event • Method of cuts to find isolated pion probably not possible • Will need to use some kind of background subtraction

More Related