Complexity and u s national preparedness
Download
1 / 27

Complexity and U.S. National Preparedness - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 118 Views
  • Updated On :

Complexity and U.S. National Preparedness. Stephen J. Krill Jr ., CEM, PMP, CFCP PhD student in Engineering Management with a focus in Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management, The George Washington University 13 th Annual Emergency Management Higher Education Conference, June 7-10, 2010.

Related searches for Complexity and U.S. National Preparedness

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Complexity and U.S. National Preparedness' - corine


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Complexity and u s national preparedness

Complexity and U.S. National Preparedness

Stephen J. Krill Jr., CEM, PMP, CFCP

PhD student in Engineering Management with a focus in Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management, The George Washington University

13th Annual Emergency Management Higher Education Conference, June 7-10, 2010


Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements

  • Presentation adapted from a research paper prepared for Dr. Richard Sylves, Environmental Hazards Management (EMSE 334), Spring 2010

  • Faculty Advisor – Dr. Greg Shaw

http://www.gwu.edu/~icdrm/



Complexity theory explains complex phenomenon when traditional methods do not
Complexity theory explains complex phenomenon when traditional methods do not

  • Integrates ideas derived from other fields, such as chaos theory, to examine systems as they are – and not by simplifying them

  • Recognizes that complex behavior emerges from a few simple rules and that all complex systems are networks of many interdependent parts which interact according to those rules

BusinessDictionary.com


To understand complexity theory consider complex systems
To understand complexity theory, consider complex systems traditional methods do not

  • In a complex system numerous independent elements continuously interact and spontaneously organize and reorganize themselves into more and more elaborate structures over time

  • Within complex systems, relationships between elements are frequently non-linear – that is, they are unpredictable

Sand pile


Characteristics of complex systems
Characteristics of complex systems traditional methods do not

Ferreira


Complex systems perpetually evolve through an “adaptive cycle” of growth, crisis, transformation, and renewal

Gunderson and Holling


So what about chaos theory
So, what about chaos theory? cycle” of growth, crisis, transformation, and renewal

  • Chaos theory – some systems, such as weather, are ultimately unpredictable because of the effects of small-scale events that cannot be included in prediction equations

    Lorenz’ butterfly effect


A little more about chaos theory
A little more about chaos theory.. cycle” of growth, crisis, transformation, and renewal

  • Chaos theory – is also a board game

http://www.educationallearninggames.com/chaos-strategy-game.asp


Whither complexity
Whither complexity? cycle” of growth, crisis, transformation, and renewal

  • Complexity as an analytical method allows us to better understand how systems are created, unfold and develop and are transformed

  • Complexity as an analytical tool allows us to understand the interactions between a disaster and its social, political, economic and environmental context



Disasters are complex events
Disasters are complex events Management?

Helbing


History as a predictor of the future
History as a predictor of the future Management?

  • When organizations prepare for a crisis, their preparations are based on experience and often follow routinized management approaches

  • But the crisis management approaches that worked yesterday may not be effective today – and may even have counter-effects tomorrow



What about predictability and control
What about predictability and control? Management?

  • Because if events are random, we are not in control, and if we are in control of events, they are not random

  • There is a fundamental clash between the need to feel we are in control and our ability to recognize randomness

The Drunkard’s Walk


While complexity theory leverages non linearity especially in the natural world
While complexity theory leverages non-linearity, especially in the natural world…

  • … emergency managers use approximations to plan for different types of disasters

    • Planning assumptions

    • Hazard substitutions

  • Mandated lists (e.g., National Planning Scenarios) do not completely account for all types of disasters, do not address emerging disasters and treat disaster as an event rather than a system


Emergency management is full of co in the natural world…mplexities, challenges, and interdependencies that influence preparedness and response

Readiness to respond within hours

“Fighting the Last War” syndrome

Lack of integrated preparedness missions

Complexity

Federalism – “Who is in charge?”

Collision of decision rights involving multiple players

Less emphasis on the unknown risks

Absence of a common preparedness doctrine


While u s national preparedness features aspects of complexity
While U.S. national preparedness features aspects of complexity...

  • Engaged partnership – leaders at all levels develop shared response goals and align capabilities so that no one is overwhelmed in times of crisis

  • Tiered response – manage incidents at the lowest possible jurisdictional level and provide support when needed

  • Scalable, flexible, and adaptable operational capabilities – as incidents change in size, scope, and complexity, adapt to meet changing requirements

  • Unity of effort through unified command – respects the chain of command while harnessing seamless coordination across jurisdictions in support of common objectives

  • Readiness to act – provide the best response possible


It does not account for self organization
…it does complexity...not account for self-organization...

  • Through self-organization, systems develop a range of extremely efficient, relatively simple solutions for solving very complex problems

  • Characteristics

    • Engage the whole system

    • Keep expanding the circle

    • Create abundant information

    • Develop quality relationships

    • Support collaboration

    • Forget boundaries

    • Focus on creating sustainability


Which suggests a need for a further shift in our approach to preparedness
… which suggests a need for a further complexity...shift in our approach to preparedness

Traditional Approach

Emerging Approach

  • Operate from a single perspective

  • Maximize objectives

  • Stay within organizational boundaries

  • Limit openness, trust, and collaboration

  • Mobilize around shared issue

  • Optimize system

  • Transcend traditional boundaries

  • Remain independent while working across sectors on common interests



Complex adaptive systems can supply the crucial conceptual “glue” to manage the process of self-organization

  • Complexity theory provides a different perspective on preparedness because it endorses flexibility and adaptability while traditional measures emphasize structure and hierarchy

  • Regardless of when or to what extent complexity theory is adapted by emergency management, there is a need for understanding the non-linear characteristics of emergencies and the concept of self-organization

  • Achieving self organization is core to complexity theory and a condition the U.S. national preparedness system should strive to achieve


Maximizing the network of relationships to enhance preparedness within a system would promote self-organization

Key Considerations

  • Identify and empower stakeholders

  • Be an initiator

  • Embrace interdependence

  • Allow for ambiguity

  • Reward collaboration

  • Strengthen social networks


Conclusions
Conclusions preparedness within a system would promote self-organization

  • Complexity theory is metaphorically useful in that it offers lessons in how to think about emergency management systems

  • Complexity encourages us to consider preparedness in different terms and to use approaches that thrive within uncertainty and disorder

  • The system that can adapt best and most quickly in an environment characterized by unpredictability, uncertainty, and rapid change, will prevail



ad