230 likes | 376 Views
The NEASC Annual Meeting held from December 4-6, 2013, highlighted key facets of Middlesex Community College (MCC) regarding civic engagement and social responsibility. The college offers 75 degree and certificate programs across two campuses, serving over 13,000 students. MCC emphasizes multicultural awareness, ethical reasoning, and community engagement among its graduates. The Vision Project aims to raise college participation, completion rates, and close achievement gaps. With a commitment to collaboration and leadership, MCC is positioned to foster informed and active citizens.
E N D
NEASC Annual MeetingDecember 4-6, 2013Philip J. SissonProvost/VP of Academic and Student AffairsMiddlesex Community Collegesissonp@middlesex.mass.edu • Measuring Civic Engagement
MCC Fast Facts Two Campuses – Bedford and Lowell • Majors: 75 degree and certificate programs • Full-time Faculty: 125 • Part-time Faculty: 460 • Average Class Size: 21 • Total enrollment: 13,267 • Full-time Enrollment: (12 credits per semester): 5,307 (44%) • Female: 7,651 (58%) • Male: 5,616 (42%)
Social Responsibility Rubric The MCC graduate will demonstrate Social Responsibility within the college community with: • Multicultural and Diversity Awareness • Student demonstrates involvement with people different from him/herself • Student acknowledges the presence of different viewpoints • Student recognizes own identity and culture and appreciates other cultures • Student articulates impact of a diverse society • Ethics, Values and Social Justice • Student recognizes injustice and discrimination • Student demonstrates the ability to make decisions based on ethical and moral reasoning • Citizenship and Civic Engagement • Student demonstrates an understanding of the value of citizenship • Student recognizes that s/he belongs to a community and demonstrates awareness of the community’s needs • Student engages in service to others • Student demonstrates understanding of how social change is achieved in a democratic system
The Vision Project – A Public Agenda for Higher Education in Massachusetts Key Outcomes • College Participation Raising the percentage of high school graduates going to college—and the readiness of these students for college-level work. • College Completion Increasing the percentage of students who complete degree and certificate programs. • Student Learning Achieving higher levels of student learning through better assessment and more extensive use of assessment results. • Workforce Alignment Aligning occupationally oriented degree and certificate programs with the needs of statewide, regional and local employers. • Preparing Citizens Providing students with the knowledge, skills and dispositions to be active, informed citizens. • Closing Achievement Gaps Closing achievement gaps among students from different ethnic, racial and income groups in all areas of educational progress. • Research Conducting research that drives economic development. Time to Lead: The Need for Excellence in Public Higher Education, September 2012
Institutional Culture/Shared Responsibility for Civic Engagement • Committed Leadership – Institution/System • Strong Collaboration – Academic and Student Affairs • Organizational Structure/Support • Use Internal and External Resources • Transition from “Inputs” to “Outcomes” Focus • On-Going Faculty Development – Assignment Design • Shared Commitment to Assessment/Improvement
Selected Resources/References • ACPA and NASPA. 2004. Learning Reconsidered: A Campus-Wide Focus on the Student Experience. Washington, DC: ACPA and NASPA. • Clayton-Pedersen, Alma R., Sharon Parker, Daryl G. Smith, José F. Moreno, and Daniel Hiroyuki Teraguchi. 2007. Making a Real Difference with Diversity: A Guide to Institutional Change. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. • Colby, Anne, Elizabeth Beaumont, Thomas Ehrlich, and Josh Corngold. 2007. Educating for Democracy: Preparing Undergraduates for Responsible Political Engagement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. • Jacoby, Barbara. 2009. Civic Engagement in Higher Education: Concepts and Practices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. • Kanter, Martha J., and Carol Geary Schneider. 2013. “Civic Learning and Engagement.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 45 (1): 6–14. • Kuh, George D. 2008. High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. • NASPA. N.d. “NASPA’s Lead Initiative on Civic Learning and Democratic Engagement.” http://www.naspa.org/clde/lead_initiative.cfm. • National Leadership Council for Liberal Education and America’s Promise. 2007. College Learning for the New Global Century. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. • National Task Force on Civic Learning and Democratic Engagement. 2012. A Crucible Moment: College Learning and Democracy’s Future. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Appendix F UMass/Lowell - Integrative Learning and Community Engagement Rubric
Appendix H Appendix B: Massachusetts Civic Learning and Engagement Assessment Framework (Massachusetts Vision Project Frameworks for Civic Learning)