1 / 26

Green Heron Tools SBIR grant

Green Heron Tools SBIR grant. Need for & feasibility of designing, producing & marketing agricultural tools & equipment for women Ann M. Adams, RN, MSN Elizabeth A. Brensinger, MPH. History of Green Heron Tools. Market growers for 13+ years at Green Heron Farms.

colton
Download Presentation

Green Heron Tools SBIR grant

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Green Heron Tools SBIR grant Need for & feasibility of designing, producing & marketing agricultural tools & equipment for women Ann M. Adams, RN, MSN Elizabeth A. Brensinger, MPH

  2. History of Green Heron Tools

  3. Market growers for 13+ years at Green Heron Farms

  4. Initial idea resulted from: • Our own experience with tools & equipment • Conversations with other women growers at farmers’ markets • Affiliations with Pennsylvania Women’s Agricultural Network, Pennsylvania Association for Sustainable Agriculture • Backgrounds in public health, nursing

  5. Company evolution • Formed in 2008, to provide high-quality agricultural and gardening tools designed to work with the bodies of women, thereby maximizing comfort, efficiency, productivity and safety. • Online survey posted summer 2008 • Target: women farmers, market growers, gardeners • Data requested: • Needs, problems, experiences with tools & equipment • Recommendations for change, potential solutions • See www.greenherontools.com for full survey • Review of literature • Submission of SBIR grant; received April, 2009

  6. Results of literature review

  7. Changing demographics in U.S. agriculture • 1997-2002 • 4% in number U.S. farms • 13% in farms operated by women • 2002-2007 • 29% in farms operated by women, compared to 3.6% increase in all U.S. farms • U.S. Department of Agriculture: 75% of U.S. farms could be owned or co-owned by women by 2014

  8. Women’s farms – trends • “Small”: 53.5% between 1 and 49 acres (U.S. Census of Agriculture, 2007) • Characteristics (Charney, 2005) • Diversified • Sustainable / organic • Part-time vocation • Value-added • Direct-marketed • Less mechanized • Average age of woman farmer: 52.6 (USDA)

  9. Women & food production: a global view • Rural women produce half of the world’s food and 60% to 80% of the food in most developing countries (Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations)

  10. Need for tools /equipment designed for women • Anatomical differences (various sources) • 40-75% less upper-body strength • 5-30% less lower-body strength • Smaller stature • More adipose tissue • Narrower shoulders • Wider hips • Proportionally shorter legs & arms • Smaller grips

  11. Need for tools/equipment designed for women • Anthropometric / human factors data • National Health & Nutrition Examination Survey: Significant differences between male & female agricultural workers in 9 / 14 anthropometric variables (Hsiao et al., 2002)

  12. Need for tools / equipment designed for women • Implications for health & safety: examples • Whole-body vibration affects women more than men (McCoy et al., 2002) • Excessive physical strain = injuries in women (Pickett et al., 1995; McCoy, 2000) • Elevated risk for musculoskeletal disability (McCoy et al., 2002) • Work-related musculoskeletal disabilities = leading cause of disability for people in working years • Lower back disorders most prevalent

  13. Need for tools /equipment designed for women • 4 factors influencing lower back disorders (Fathallah et al., 2004): • Heavy physical work • Lifting and forceful movements • Bending and twisting (awkward postures) • Whole-body vibration • All 4 influenced by design & fit of tools • U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (2001): • 1 of the 2 best ways to reduce work-related musculoskeletal disorders: redesign of tools

  14. Lack of tools / equipment designed for women • Searches conducting using these databases • AGRICOLA • Applied Science & Technology Abstracts • American Society of Agricultural & Biological Engineers’ Technical Library • Electronic resources of National Agricultural Library • National Technological Information Service • USDA’s Current Research Information System • No evidence of efforts to redesign tools / equipment for women in U.S. or Canada; limited efforts in India

  15. Green Heron Tools research results Funded in part by USDA Small Business Innovative Research grant

  16. Methodology • Online survey (n = 218; 105 self-identified farmers / market growers; 113 gardeners) • Four focus groups with 26 participating farmers / market growers • Oregon (Pacific Northwest) • Vermont (n = 2) (Northeast) • Iowa (via conference call) (Midwest) • (pilot focus group at Penn State) • Interviews with 13 women • Input obtained from women in 32/50 states

  17. Survey results

  18. General findings (re: tools/equipment) • Too heavy • Shafts too long • Handles too high • Not well-balanced for female users • Mechanized equipment too heavy, difficult to control • Pull strings too long (gas engines) • Mechanized equipment too noisy

  19. Focus groups / interviews • General support for survey findings • Anecdotal evidence regarding health problems • In all 3 face-to-face focus groups, women cited histories of disabilities & injuries, including: • Sore backs / back injuries (sprained sacrum; back surgery; general soreness) • Arthritis • Torn tendons

  20. What now? • Identification & sale of existing tools & equipment that work well for women • E-commerce site up later this year • Design of new tools (SBIR grant)

  21. Process for choosing tools • Recommendations from surveys, focus groups, interviews, other women farmers • Purchase / acquisition of tools • Testing & evaluation by women farmers • Analysis of data from evaluations • Identification of tools that work best for women

  22. SBIR grant – current status

  23. Design team: Penn State members Aaron Yoder, ag engineering; Angie Hissong, occupational therapist / AgrAbility; Andy Freivalds, ergonomist, manufacturing engineer; Jesun Hwang, doctoral student

  24. Deliverables include: • Set of design parameters for tools/equipment designed for women • Prototypes of three hand tools • General design concepts for a rototiller

  25. Criteria/Design Considerations • High quality • Durable • Reliable • Effective for defined task • Ergonomic • Based on anthropometric / human factors data • As simple as possible to maintain and operate

  26. Criteria/Design Considerations • Safe to use • Include a description of how to use tool correctly • As “green” or sustainable as possible without compromising effectiveness and strength • Materials, fuel (if applicable), manufacturing process • Reasonable cost / good value

More Related