1 / 13

Managing Research Data: Calls 14/09 and 4/10

Managing Research Data: Calls 14/09 and 4/10. Joseph Hutcheon, JISC Policy Officer. Joint Information Systems Committee. Supporting education and research. Summary. Eligibility Initial Scoping Stage Terms & Conditions Structure of Bid Budget Freedom of Information Evaluation Criteria

colton-wise
Download Presentation

Managing Research Data: Calls 14/09 and 4/10

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Managing Research Data: Calls 14/09 and 4/10 Joseph Hutcheon, JISC Policy Officer Joint Information Systems Committee Supporting education and research

  2. Summary • Eligibility • Initial Scoping Stage • Terms & Conditions • Structure of Bid • Budget • Freedom of Information • Evaluation Criteria • Checklist for Final Stages • Evaluation Process

  3. Eligibility (i) • Grant Funding call 14/09: • HEIs funded by HEFCE • HEIs funded by HEFCW • FECs in England teaching HE to 400+ FTEs • Other organisations may be project partners BUT • Lead site must be in one of above categories AND • All grants will be paid via lead site.

  4. Eligibility (ii) • Grant Funding Call 4/10: • HEIs in England • FECs in England teaching HE to 400+ FTEs • HEIs and FECs in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland • Other organisations may be partners to bids BUT • Lead site must be in one of above categories AND • All grants will be paid via lead site.

  5. Initial Scoping Phase • Read the call & background briefings to understand programme rationale • Ensure project ideas are within scope & map to call objectives, timetable, budget, planned activities, priorities • Consider fit with institutional objectives • Consider project partners; internal & external • Clarify outputs and wider benefits to community • Secure institutional support & funding commitment at a high level for project period • Consider sustainability issues

  6. Must DO’s • State aims and objectives clearly and concisely • Clarify project outputs and outcomes, demonstrating impact and wider benefits to education and research • Describe how bid meets criteria in the call • Provide a sound project plan and project management arrangements • Document proposed dissemination and evaluation mechanisms • Demonstrate how the bid is aligned with the objectives of your institution • Demonstrate high level institutional support • Provide clear costings based on fEC (% FTEs, grades of staff, etc). • Demonstrate value for money, with institutional contribution(s) as appropriate • Comment on sustainability when JISC funding ceases

  7. Structure of Bid • Cover Sheet • Introduction – rationale, project length, how contributes to programme • Project Description (deliverables, performance indicators, methodology, project plan, timetable, project management, analysis of risks, dissemination/impact, evaluation, sustainability, intellectual property) • Budget, broken down across project years (staff time, T&S, hardware/software, dissemination, evaluation, total fEC costs + any institutional contributions towards total cost) • Key personnel, relevant skills (indicate where plan to recruit) • Letters demonstrating support from lead institution and all partners

  8. Budget • Appendix C: Budget Template and Definitions • Ensure budget is clear & detailed, clarifying total cost • Breakdown budget across April-March years • Staff costs: proportion of time, include salary increases • Travel & subsistence, consumables • Hardware/software, dissemination, evaluation • Summarise qualitative and quantitative benefits project partners will gain from project • Indicate institutional contribution(s) towards project: no set percentage but remember: value for money is a criterion!

  9. Freedom of Information • JISC is subject to Freedom of Information Act 2000 • Bids may be disclosed upon receipt of valid request • Appendix A FOI Withheld Information Form • No disclosure until evaluation process complete • JISC will consult with bidders prior to release of information, but • Final decision on disclosure rests with JISC • Successful bids will be made available on JISC website • All unsuccessful bids are destroyed one month after notification of funding decision

  10. Evaluation Criteria • Review the evaluation criteria – weighted (same for both calls) • Appropriateness and Fit to Programme Objectives & Overall Value to JISC Community (25%) • Quality of Proposal and Robustness of Workplan (25%) • Engagement with the Community (20%) • Value for money (15%) • Experience of Project Team (15%) • Check that the bid demonstrates what it needs to convincingly • Consider your bid from an evaluator’s perspective • Ask someone not directly involved to review the bid and score against the evaluation criteria and provide feedback

  11. Checklist for Final Stages • Deadline is 12 noon, Tuesday 25 May 2010: no appeal process for late bids! • Check format for submission of bids (2 pdfs; zipped if files exceeds 10Mb ) • Two pdfs required: one to include the main proposal (including cover sheet); and one to include the FOI Withheld Information Form and letter(s) of support • Check appropriate page limit adhered to (single sides A4, Arial 11): any bids exceeding the page limit will not be evaluated. • Maximum of ten pages including cover sheet for 14/09 • Maximum of eight pages including cover sheet for 4/10 • Ensure letter(s) of institutional/partner support provided • Ensure cover sheet completed FULLY • Ensure FOI form completed • Submit bid to RESEARCHDATA@jisc.ac.uk

  12. Evaluation Process • Expert Evaluation Panels • Conflicts of interest avoided • 2-3 markers per bid using formal marksheet and guidance • Executive analyses marks/comments and produces report • Evaluation panel meetings (face to face or ‘virtual’) to select projects • JISC reserves right not to allocate total amount of available funding • Executive communicates decisions to bidders (June 2010) • Executive provides feedback to unsuccessful bidders on request • Executive issues funding letters (July 2010) • http://www.jisc.ac.uk/bideval.html has full details of process

  13. Finally … Any Questions?

More Related