1 / 42

Building Bridges in Our Communities During Times of Trauma

A Bridge Over. Troubled Water. Building Bridges in Our Communities During Times of Trauma. Chris Mercer College of the North Atlantic, Stephenville, NL. Is there a role for post secondary counsellors in building bridges to other human services professionals within our communities?.

colleen
Download Presentation

Building Bridges in Our Communities During Times of Trauma

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Bridge Over Troubled Water Building Bridges in Our Communities During Times of Trauma Chris Mercer College of the North Atlantic, Stephenville, NL

  2. Is there a role for post secondary counsellors in building bridges to other human services professionals within our communities?

  3. Overview • Where have we been? • Where are we? • Where are we going?

  4. Overview • Context • Trauma in the Community • Thinking Outside of the Box • Issues & Solutions • What We’ve Learned • Summary

  5. Trauma • Trauma comes from Latin for wound • Wound can be in body, mind, spirit, relationships • Predominant therapeutic models are individually focused, pathology based, aim to identify & reduce symptoms of post traumatic stress (Walsh, 2007)

  6. Community Trauma • Impact of traumatic events on communities is on a continuum • Trauma has potential to change communities basic assumptions • Safety • Control • Being able to make sense of events

  7. Community Trauma • Natural helping systems may be insufficient during times of trauma • Non-existent • Severely disrupted • Communities have various levels of success in dealing with trauma

  8. Community Trauma • Potential risks to communities of long lasting difficulties in social, family, or individual functioning • Communities may need help recovering from traumatic events • On individual level: trauma can lead to: • Stress disorders, addictions, domestic problems, coping problems

  9. Community Trauma • Multi-systemic, resilience oriented practice approach (Rutter, 1999; Walsh, 2007) • Recognizes community impact of trauma • Contextualizes distress • Attends to effects through relational networks • Aims to strengthen community resources • Community wide responses are most effective when centrally coordinated

  10. Context • Newfoundland & Labrador – pop. approx 500,000 • Bay St. George region – pop. approx 25,000 • Stephenville – pop. approx 8000 • Site of former US Air Force Base • College of North Atlantic local campus • approx 600 full time students • 200 Residence/400 Commuters

  11. Context • 1970s/80s: high need/service gaps • Collaboration opportunities? • DIY ethic • Result: multi-disciplinary/agency initiatives • Increased community capacity to meet needs of individuals/groups

  12. Context • 1990s/2000s: renewed interest/ need for increased capacity/ community trauma response • Initial stakeholders • counsellors representing college, social work, mental health, secondary school • Goal: collaboration on community trauma response

  13. The Hidden Agenda • Was there an opportunity to: • Increase local community capacity/ skill levels for trauma response? • Include both professionals AND community members? • Get someone to pay for it? • Role(s) for College?

  14. Barriers to collaboration • No sense of urgency • Concerns around: • Turf • Leadership/Ownership • Logistics • Liability • Informed consent/confidentiality • Direct versus indirect services • WIIFM (What’s in it for me?)

  15. For some team members: Success defined by professional competencies and high levels of individual achievement; not necessarily by team building and collaboration skills.

  16. Trauma & Community • Stephenville (late 90s) = limited experience with community trauma; limited capacity for coordinated response; desire to increase capacity • What changed the status quo?

  17. Response Counsellors from all agencies volunteered to provide services • Debriefing (short term/immediate) • Defusing (short term/immediate) • Counselling (longer term if possible)

  18. Trauma & Community • Stephenville (post traumatic events) = experience • What did we learn? • Responses were effective BUT spontaneous, uncoordinated, difficult to replicate/evaluate

  19. Thinking Outside the Box • Trauma mandate ≠ any single stakeholder • Steering group • Goal: find a corporate sponsor • Best Fit = regional health authority

  20. Thinking Outside the Box • HOWEVER: initiative is collaborative and multi-disciplinary • Not owned solely by regional health authority • Working group evolved into Community Trauma Assessment Team

  21. Building the Bridge • Multidisciplinary, multi-agency working group • Redefined vision/mission • Response versus assessment • Strategic plan • Included needs assessment, deliverables, evaluation • Growing the team: additional members invited • clergy, police, EMO

  22. Issues & Solutions • Confidentiality • Information sharing • Privacy legislation • Liability • Different Codes of Practice • Different employers/scope of work/unions • Different policies and procedures

  23. Issues & Solutions • Most issues needed to be negotiated as a team • Solutions are usually specific to individual team • Team has spent considerable time looking at fundamental assumptions • Helps mitigate barriers (i.e. diversity)

  24. Issues & Solutions • Moved beyond assessment and planning stages • Delivers coordinated trauma services to local area • Assessment of need and response • Could include debriefing and defusing • Educational sessions • Training opportunities

  25. What We’ve Learned • Someone has to begin to build the bridge • College and University Counsellors are well positioned to provide leadership to community

  26. Community Trauma Response Capacity DIAGRAM: Relationship between Counselling, Adult Education, and Community Capacity Building.

  27. What We’ve Learned • Engaging other agencies requires a will to make collaboration work • DESPITE inherent barriers with multi-disciplinary teams • i.e. differing policies, protocols, guidelines, orientations, assumptions • Requires a sense of timing

  28. What We’ve Learned • Sustaining initiative requires high degree of trust among team members • Assumption that team has collective concern for the common good

  29. Next Steps • Continues to be work in progress • Training upcoming in June 2007 and Fall 2007 • Looking at other training possibilities • Planning community education events • Assessing and responding to trauma in the community

  30. Summary Remarks • The Community Trauma Assessment Team continues to provide coordinated response to trauma in the Bay St. George area • Successes in both building bridges and in addressing traumatic events translates into a safer, more caring community

  31. Thank You © College of the North Atlantic 2007

  32. References Rutter, M. (1999). Resilience concepts and findings: Implications for family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 119–144. Walsh, F. (2007). Traumatic Loss and Major Disasters: Strengthening Family and Community Resilience. Family Process,46 (2), 207–227.

More Related