slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Paul Hershkowitz, Wilbur Smith Associates John Thomas, Utah DOT PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Paul Hershkowitz, Wilbur Smith Associates John Thomas, Utah DOT

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 7

Paul Hershkowitz, Wilbur Smith Associates John Thomas, Utah DOT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 183 Views
  • Uploaded on

Using a Statewide Model to Help Improve State Long-Range Plan Decision-Making: The Utah DOT Experience. Paul Hershkowitz, Wilbur Smith Associates John Thomas, Utah DOT Michael Fazio, City of South Salt Lake * Jonathan Avner, Wilbur Smith Associates David Hurst, Wilbur Smith Associates

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Paul Hershkowitz, Wilbur Smith Associates John Thomas, Utah DOT' - colin-vega


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1
Using a Statewide Model to Help Improve State Long-Range Plan Decision-Making: The Utah DOT Experience

Paul Hershkowitz, Wilbur Smith Associates

John Thomas, Utah DOT

Michael Fazio, City of South Salt Lake*

Jonathan Avner, Wilbur Smith Associates

David Hurst, Wilbur Smith Associates

*Formerly with Utah DOT

purpose of presentation
Purpose of Presentation

Describe the LRP process.

Overview of how the statewide model was applied in the development of the Utah DOT Long-Range Plan (LRP).

lrp process
LRP Process

LRP team – UDOT, Bio-West, InterPlan, WSA

Foster better communication and understanding between the Regions and Planning

Regions were the key - Bottom up, not top down

Regions - project driven

Needs by region by phase (2010-2020, 2021-2030, 2031-2040, & unfunded)

lrp process 2
LRP Process (2)

Value-added: “this is what our analysis shows, what do you think?”

Needs to projects w/ region involvement

Fiscally constrained

Tiered by type of project

PI : Libraries, RPOs, MPOs, UDOT & uPLAN websites

Streamlined document

ustm lrp application
USTM LRP Application

Utah Statewide Travel Model (USTM) - developed (Phase I) and calibrated (Phase II) - 2007-2009

Currently daily vehicle and truck model – “match the maps”

Whole state, including MPOs – but focus is on rural and “emerging” areas. Supplements, doesn’t replace, MPO models

LRP was one of the apps for which USTM was built

ustm lrp application 2
USTM LRP Application (2)

Regional briefing – LRP process and USTM

Deficiencies (capacity needs) by region

Improvements (projects) to resolve deficiencies

No-Build – 2008, 2020, 2030, 2040, unfunded “needs”

Baseline (w/ MPO projects) – 2008, 2020, 2030, 2040, unfunded “needs”

ustm lrp application 3
USTM LRP Application (3)

Regional review, then iterated model runs

Some projects moved to different phases or deleted (based on funding) after iterations

Model results input to project fact sheets