community health fund insurance in tanzania n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
COMMUNITY HEALTH FUND (INSURANCE) IN TANZANIA PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
COMMUNITY HEALTH FUND (INSURANCE) IN TANZANIA

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 21

COMMUNITY HEALTH FUND (INSURANCE) IN TANZANIA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 149 Views
  • Uploaded on

COMMUNITY HEALTH FUND (INSURANCE) IN TANZANIA. OUR EXPERIENCE IN THE LAST 12 YEARS Dr Faustine Njau Tanzania. CONTENT. BACKGROUND INFORMATION EXPERIENCE OF THE SCHEME OBJECTIVES DESIGN FEATURES AND CHRONOLOGY 1999-2007 STATUS SUCCESS STORIES CONSTRAINTS OPPORTUNITIES THREATS

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

COMMUNITY HEALTH FUND (INSURANCE) IN TANZANIA


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Presentation Transcript
    1. COMMUNITY HEALTH FUND (INSURANCE) IN TANZANIA OUR EXPERIENCE IN THE LAST 12 YEARS Dr Faustine Njau Tanzania

    2. CONTENT • BACKGROUND INFORMATION • EXPERIENCE OF THE SCHEME • OBJECTIVES • DESIGN FEATURES AND CHRONOLOGY 1999-2007 • STATUS • SUCCESS STORIES • CONSTRAINTS • OPPORTUNITIES • THREATS • NEXT STEPS

    3. BACK GROUND INFO… • UNIVERSAL ACCESS IS CONTINGENT UPON UNIVERSAL AVAILABILITY OF THE BASIC HEALTH SERVICES • AVAILABILITY IS ALSO SUBJECT TO ADEQUATE FINANCING & HUMAN RESOUCE FOR HEALTH AND MANAGEMENT • THE CHALLENGES IN THE AFRICA REGION ON THIS SUBJECT IS “CHRONIC AND SEVERE” UNDER FINANCING OF HEALTH CARE

    4. BACK GROUND INFO…2 • FROM COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AND PARTICIPATION TO COMMUNITY OWNERSHIPS, AND SHARE HOLDERS IN PRIMARY HEALTH SERVICES:- OWNERS/SHARE HOLDERS: • TAKE RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDING FINANCING. • OVER SEE THE MANAGEMENT OF ASSETS AND SERVICE DELIVERY. • THEY HAVE THE VOICE AND SAY TO THE DIRECTION OF THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF SERVICE DELIVERY.

    5. BACK GROUND INFO…3 • ONE OF THE FUNDAMENTAL STRATEGY IS OWNERSHIP/SHARE HOLDING BY THE COMMUNITY : • Through complimentary financing of the Health Services • Boards and committees that have a voice and say, how the services are to be provided and managed.

    6. COMMUNITY HEALTH FINANCINGTHE TANZANIAEXPERIENCE OBJECTIVES OF CHF SCHEME:- • To address the financing gap of the basic health care due to severe budget deficit. This is in the context of HIPC. • To compliment health care financing in Tanzania in a form of Cost-Sharing (between the community and the government) • To strengthen the ongoing health reforms. • To enhance Fiscal decentralization and ownership of the PHC – Services by the community. • To recognize community voice and mandate to be heard in the health service as financiers as well

    7. THE DESIGN OF COMMUNITY HEALTH FINANCING SCHEME IN TANZANIA • Designed to fit into prepayment for health care in a form of cost-sharing andnot cost recovery • It is the same spirit of Bamako Initiatives. • Making Communities share holders/owners of PHC Facilities, and not charitable goods • From the notion of government facilities to that of community owned facilities. • It is community right to health, right to speak, right to ask for results and right to correct mismanagement of the facilities. This is community empowerment. • In line with the principle of Decentralization by Devolution beyond the District (LGAs) Headquarters.

    8. PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE TO DATE • 1995 Design of the CHF Scheme • Some partners were lookers, could not believe the design will work (Concepts and Contextual differences). • 1996 -Pre-testing the design in one District (LGA) Igunga for 3 years. It worked. • Piloting 4 more districts and later 5 more. • 2001 – Total 10 districts (LGAs under the pilot) • Adjustment of the design from experience gained. • Payment methods in cash, payment in kind, payment through co-operatives members accepted etc. and is determined by community committees (each LGA, different amount depends on their ability and willingness to pay) • It is a voluntary scheme) • Need to standardize payment seen but not yet implemented.

    9. EXPERIENCE TO DATE…2 • 2001 - Bill passed to establish CHF in all LGAs. • The bill require LGAs to make bylaws for establishing the fund. • There should be a Health Board at each LGA to over see amongst others Health Development issues and the running of CHF in the District. • Guidelines for CHF written and printed, available:- (a) Concept and Objective of CHF (b) Establishment CHF in a LGA – Mechanics. (c) Training Manual (d) Planning Guide on use of Health funds.

    10. EXPERIENCE TO DATE…3 • STATUS: • Target 98 LGAs eligible for CHF establishment by 2004but:- • 74 LGAs have established CHF - by 2007 • All 98 Have established CHSB and committees to manage CHF 2007. • This scheme is good for Rural House Holds (setting) not good for Urban setting. • A design for Urban is on pretest in 4 urban areas from 2004. Instead of a HHs – contribution, in urban areas we need each individual to contribute and have own Health/Card to access basic health care from public run facilities.

    11. EXPERIENCE TO DATE…4 SUCCESS: In all LGAs implementing CHF:- • Essential drugs are available and hence, ↑↑services available. • Accessible more than previous – base on availability of supplies • Community ownerships is felt • 10 – 30% House Holds have memberships card in 74 LGAs. • 50% of patients are exempted (Nov. 2005 in some districts). • Exemptions and Waivers are working (March 2005) • Providers responsiveness to community demands. • Higher level of accountability (see External evaluation report for health sector in TZ 1999-2006)

    12. EXPERIENCE TO DATE…3 SUCCESS: • Efficiency & Effectiveness has increased (supplies, equipment rehabilitation of facilities etc). • Quality of services improved • Management improved. • In All District Health Plans, there is activity to support CHF advocacy, and a code to pay for the poor households. • At the central level the MoHSW has introduce code to pay for waivers and exemptions pending, conclusion of service agreements.

    13. EXPERIENCE TO DATE…3 CONSTRAINTS:- • The health sector is severely under funded, this gap feeling measure is not enough to deliver the basic package as yet. • Demand services at Referral levels to be paid from the CHF including Amenities (Boarding, food and transport during referral). • Management problems – human resources is a problem and more so even in the LGAs. • Weak advocacy at all levels, though very high political will.

    14. Opportunities available OPPORTUNITIES : • The context is correct, people want to participate and not be treated as objects of charity (the poor have equal rights to participate in development) . • CHF is voluntary – hence demand driven – people want the government to roll over quickly more than we were prepared. • Partners are now ready to support the CHF Programme, GTZ, World Bank, SWISS, DANIDA, USAID, ECSA, Pharma access, France. • Exemptions and Waivers should be a honorable duty of Community Leadership and not the central govt. • Providers should be responsible for service provision not exemptions or waivers.

    15. Opportunities Available…2 • Through the Boards and Committees, peoples voice start shaping providers behaviors. • Private participation, an opportunity to get service contracts LGAs, level and gets paid. • Quality improvement. • Window of enhancing accountability. • Fiscal decentralization – government contributions transferred directly to CHF accounts to be managed at local level beyond the district. • More transparent waivers and exemptions now in community committees and out of the government Technocrats and bureaucracy .

    16. Opportunities available…3 • Stronger and better managed districts (LGAs) are providing technical support to other LGAs. • ECSA – Health Community Agenda for – TA. • It is a Global agenda for Health financing and Social Protection. • Improve management at all levels and incentives to providers and managers of health facilities. • Introduce budget item for waivers and exemptions at LGA levels as has been done at MOHSW • Round up (average cost) for care to be paid at one stop station at the H/Facility – This enhances cross – subsidization, removes confusion and uncertainties.

    17. THREATS:1 • The wrong assumption that those who are poor are also sick. This is not the case at all !! • The assumption that “ABOLISH USER FEES” by the poor nations from all social services will increase access and equity !! (equity and access are a function of AVAILABILITY) • Poverty Reduction strategies - Some believe Health Care should be freely provided by the poor governments, regardless of past failures.

    18. THREATS:2 • Continued stigmatizing the poor as objects of charity • Assumption that poverty is a permanent state (which is not ) • Increasing costs of health care and HIV/AIDS epidemic. It confounding to any health care initiatives, including community health funding NO MUCH FREEDOM TO MAKE OWN CHOICES:- • Donor Dependency – Government budgets in Tanzania 35-42%. • The sector is financed on budget with 10 USD, (2007/08) of which internal government funding is 65-58 %

    19. THE NEXT STEPS • Scale up CHF country wide to all 132 LGAs, • Establish umbrella association of CHFs to allow cross subsidization and portability of the cards across Tanzania • Solicit international partnerships in financing the mgt and monitoring CHF including revenue targeting • The vision is that of social health insurance in intermediate adopt a mixed strategy for health financing • Operational Research and studies to improve the schemes • Link the CHF and the NHIF to synergize each other. • Advocate ALAT to take a proactive roll in community health financing

    20. NEXT STEPS …2 • Request international support including that of WHO • CHF is a home grown scheme and is localized. No prescriptions from outside but we need people who can listen and support our scheme instead of imposing theirs on it. • We welcome other countries in the region to study our scheme and see how it is adaptable to their settings

    21. THANK YOU FOR ATTENTION