1 / 23

B s -meson physics: perspectives at ATLAS & CMS

B s -meson physics: perspectives at ATLAS & CMS. Roberto Covarelli (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations VI B-physics meeting – Ferrara – 18-19 March 2009. Outline. Heavy-Flavor Physics at ATLAS and CMS The LHC foreseen schedule and its impact on experimental goals

cogdell
Download Presentation

B s -meson physics: perspectives at ATLAS & CMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Bs-meson physics: perspectives at ATLAS & CMS Roberto Covarelli (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations VI B-physics meeting – Ferrara – 18-19 March 2009 Roberto Covarelli

  2. Outline • Heavy-Flavor Physics at ATLAS and CMS • The LHC foreseen schedule and its impact on experimental goals • The ATLAS and CMS detectors • Triggers dedicated to Heavy-Flavor physics • Level-1 and software-based triggers • Some selected topics: • CP violation measurements in Bs → J/y f (ATLAS and CMS) • Search for the rare decay Bs → m+ m- (ATLAS and CMS) • Search for the rare decay Bs → f m+ m-(CMS) • Measurement of Bs oscillations (ATLAS) • Conclusions Roberto Covarelli

  3. Heavy-flavor physics at LHC • A rich heavy-flavor physics program is foreseen at LHC, thanks to the huge heavy-quark pair production cross-section (sbb ~ 400 mb @ 10 TeV) • LHCb  experiment dedicated to B-physics • ATLAS and CMS experiments dedicated to high-pT physics • When studying exclusive B/Bs decay modes, trigger/reconstruction capabilities are limited to particular channels with peculiar signatures • At high luminosity probably limited to events including a muon pair • At low luminosity more trigger combinations could be effective (single muon, muon + low-ET jet, electron pair, track combinations…) • Anyway all channels suppressed even by minimal pT thresholds/cuts  challenging analyses Example: bb → X J/y → m+ m- @ 10 TeV Roberto Covarelli

  4. The new LHC schedule… • After inspection of damages caused by the Sep 2008 incident and accurate estimation of repair times, new accelerator schedule coming out of February meeting in Chamonix: • New start-up in autumn 2009 • Long physics run through autumn 2010 (skipping previously scheduled winter break) • Foreseeing ~10 “luminosity periods” according to changing beam conditions (intensity, b*, number of bunches …etc.) Roberto Covarelli

  5. LHC 2009/10 …and impact on B-physics • Energy decrease does not affect much theoretical cross-section: • sbb (10 TeV) ~ 400 mb  N(Bs) ~ 48 M/pb-1 • Low instantaneous luminosity has a large impact on event selection criteria, especially at trigger level • For all studies presented trigger strategies will be detailed, highlighting if / to which extent the analysis yields have been estimated using realistic low-luminosity thresholds Roberto Covarelli

  6. The ATLAS detector • Coverage: |h| < 2.5 and full f • 3-level trigger (1 hardware + 2 software) • Acceptance forces relatively high pT muons at trigger level • Good muon resolution in tracker + spectrometer Combined Muon Roberto Covarelli

  7. The CMS detector • Coverage: |h| < 2.4 and full f • 2-level trigger (Level 1 + High-Level Trigger) • Muon triggers expected to be efficient down to pT ~ 3 GeV/c • Excellent muon reconstruction performances due to: • 3.8-T magnetic field • all-silicon tracker pT resolution in silicon tracker (muons) Roberto Covarelli

  8. The ATLAS B-physics trigger • Level-1 (Thin Gap Chambers + RPC) • 2MU0 / 2MU6 streams: 2 Regions of Interest (RoI) in Dh x Df associated to any pT(m) / pT(m) > 6 GeV/c • Level-2 • confirm each m RoI with precision muon chamber and inner detector measurements • dimuon vertex reconstruction and cuts on invariant mass • EventFilter: • refit inner detector tracks • proper decay length cut • angular distribution cuts • Output rate (L = 1033 cm-2 s-1) ~ 10 Hz Single LVL1 efficiency LVL2/LVL1 efficiency Roberto Covarelli

  9. ATLAS low-luminosity trigger • “Improved” di-muon triggers: • Extended Region of Interest around a single LVL1 seed • Inside-out reconstruction of track pairs compatible with RoI  unbiased double trigger, can be used for efficiency calibration • Possibility to add selections on: • Invariant mass • Vertex c2 • Muon + Inner Detector triggers: • Full scan of ID possible at 1031 cm-2 s-1 • Possible to identify particular hadronic states with subsequent requirements on invariant masses (e.g. Bs→ Dsp, Ds → fp, f → KK) pp → X J/y → m+ m- “Improved” di-muon Roberto Covarelli

  10. The CMS B-physics trigger • Level 1 trigger (hardware – all types of muon detectors): • High-level trigger (HLT, software – muon stations + tracker): • all muon paths: • pT cut • pixel track seeds • partial track reconstruction up to 6 tracker hits or pT/pT < 0.02 • di-muon trigger paths: • opposite charge • possibility to add invariant mass cuts • “displaced” di-muon trigger paths: • add requirements on secondary vertex 2 and flight length (2 x 1033 cm-2 s-1) (2 x 1033 cm-2 s-1) no mass cut Roberto Covarelli

  11. CMS low-luminosity triggers • Muon thresholds slowly varying with luminosity  initial physics/efficiency studies can be done with the lowest single muon thresholds Main B-physics trigger rates vs. instantaneous luminosity Roberto Covarelli

  12. Bs→ J/y f : theory • “Golden channel” for time-dependent measurements in the Bs system: • weak phase, analogous of 2b for Bd system, at present tightly constrained by CKM fits: fs = -0.0366 ± 0.0015 • Room for New Physics considering recent Tevatron measurements (see Diego’s talk) • P → VV structure: different CP eigenvalues for longitudinal/parallel/transverse polarizations • Use of the transversity basis to describe the total amplitude: ■68% p.c. ■95% p.c. fNP SM CNP The apparent complexity w.r.t. P → VP modes improves sensitivity instead, since physics parameters enter each term differently  possibility of untagged analyses Roberto Covarelli

  13. Bs→ J/y f : event selection • Reconstruction channel: Bs→ J/y (m+m-) f (K+K-) • Similar in ATLAS and CMS • Both studies based on high-luminosity scenarios (1-2 x 1033 cm-2 s-1) • Vertexing: • Primary vertex reconstruction using highest sum of pT2 to discriminate from pile-up events • Kinematic fit to muons and K tracks determine secondary vertex • Selection: • Displaced di-muon trigger • J/y and f invariant mass requirements • Decay length significance and c2 of kinematic fit • cos apoint (angle between Bs transverse momentum and the vector pointing from primary to secondary vertex) • Main backgrounds: • Bd→ J/y (m+m-) K*0 (K+p-) • Prompt/non-prompt J/y Roberto Covarelli

  14. Bs→ J/y f : flavor tagging • OST: using charge of highest-pT lepton in the rest of the event • Only usable for a small fraction of events (other b → l) • SST: jet charge method • Charge ordering in fragmentation models implies that higher-momentum tracks from a b-quark fragmentation tend to have negative charge and viceversa • Jet charge defined as: Performances on the “self-tagging” mode Bd→ J/y K*0 w = (37.4 ± 0.5)% • k = 0.7 • pi , qi = momentum/charge of tracks (not associated to signal) within DR = 0.7 from the B meson direction Roberto Covarelli

  15. Bs→ J/y f : results • ATLAS and CMS: • Using unbinned maximum likelihood fit to pseudo-proper time distribution including experimental effects: • Acceptance • Mistag rate (ATLAS) • Resolution function Roberto Covarelli

  16. Bs→ m+m- : theory • Process highly suppressed in SM: • Effective FCNC, helicity suppression • BRtheor(Bs→ m+m-) = (3.86 ± 0.15) x 10-9 M. Artuso et al., Eur. Phys. J. C57, 309 (2008) • Sensitivity to New Physics models: • CMSSM: • 2HDM: Roberto Covarelli

  17. Bs→ m+m- : selection • Cut-based analyses (similar in ATLAS and CMS) using: • Di-muon angular separation: • cosapoint(pointing angle in 3-D) • Flight length in 2-D (both absolute value and significance) • c2 of secondary vertex fit • Bs-candidate isolation: trk varying over all tracks with pT > 0.9 GeV/c in a cone of semi-aperture R = 1.0 • Region of |mmm – m(Bs)| (asymmetric in ATLAS to reject Bd → mm) Lxy isolation Roberto Covarelli

  18. Bs→ m+m- : signal and backgrounds • Signal mass resolution • ATLAS: 70 (barrel)-120 (endcap) MeV/c2 • CMS: (53.0 ± 1.4) MeV/c2 (total) • Main surviving backgrounds: • Non-peaking: • independent bb semileptonic decays • True muons from same side [Bc→ J/y (mm) mn] • One true-one fake muon [B → mhX] • Peaking: • Two fake muons [Bs→ hh] Roberto Covarelli

  19. Bs→ m+m- : results • ATLAS (10 fb-1): nS = 5.7, nB = 14+13-10 • No upper limit extraction performed • CMS (1 fb-1): nS = 2.36 ± 0.07, nB = 6.5 ± 2.4 • Using Bu→ J/y K+as a normalization channel to extract BR: • Bayesian method: BR(Bs→ m+m-) < 1.5 x 10-8 @ 90% CL Bu yield at 1 fb-1 • CDF-DØ combined exclusion limit: BR(Bs→ m+m-) < 4.5 x 10-8 @ 95% CL Roberto Covarelli

  20. Bs→ fm+m- in CMS • Also a FCNC process  sensitivity to NP in: • Branching Ratio: • CDF: BR(Bs→ fm+m-)/BR(Bs→ J/y f) < 2.61 x 10-3 • SM: (1.3 ± 0.5) x 10-3 • FW-BW asymmetry: • hard to measure at ATLAS/CMS: requires tagging • Normalization to J/y f by selecting resonant/non-resonant regions of mm mass Vetoed regions y’ J/y PRELIMINARY • Trigger: low-luminosity double muon at 3 GeV/c • After selection: • Main background from tails of resonant decays • Observation after 150-200 pb-1 of collected data (statistical only) with “earliest data” systematics with systematics statistical only Roberto Covarelli

  21. Dms measurement at ATLAS • Signal modes: Bs→ Dsp, Bs→ Ds a1 (other b → m) • Accurate study of low-luminosity trigger strategy (1031 cm-2 s-1): • Muon LVL1 seed (pT > 4 GeV/c) • Triggering full scan of ID, to look for combinations of tracks satisfying loose invariant mass cuts according to the chain Ds → fp, f → KK • Background rate = 7.5 Hz • Timing = 91 ms/event (LVL2) - 470 ms/event (EF) • OS-flavor tagging with soft muon charge: • etagDtag2 (Bs→ Dsp) = 30% • etagDtag2 (Bs→ Ds a1) = 28% • Mistag dominated by mixing and b → c → m processes Roberto Covarelli

  22. Dms measurement at ATLAS • Event selection: • Combination of tracks with angular separation and invariant mass cuts • Maximum-likelihood trec fit: • 5 simultaneous PDFs for: 1-2) Unmixed-mixed Bs 3-4) Unmixed-mixed Bd 5) Non-oscillating background • Amplitude fit method on toy MC samples to determine sensitivity vs. integrated luminosity Main backgrounds s =(53.0 ± 0.7) MeV/c2 Bs, mixed Roberto Covarelli

  23. Conclusions • Perspectives for Bs-meson physics at ATLAS and CMS have been presented • Key element: developing dedicated trigger strategies to improve efficiency during low-luminosity LHC data-taking period (2009/10) • CP violation measurements in Bs → J/y f • ATLAS (CMS) with 30 (10) fb-1 of data will be able to confirm TeVatron (not SM!) fs values with a precision of ~0.05 (0.07) • Search for the rare decay Bs → m+ m- • CMS can reach upper limits competitive with TeVatron with 1 fb-1 • Search for the rare decay Bs → f m+ m- • CMS can reach 5s sensitivity with ~200 pb-1 (statistical errors only) • Measurement of Bs oscillations • TeVatron values of Dms accessible in ATLAS analysis with 5 fb-1 Roberto Covarelli

More Related