1 / 9

Presented by Thomas Hertel Purdue University

Geospatial, Open-Source Hosting of Agriculture, Resources and Environmental Data Pilot Project Overview & Lessons Learned. Presented by Thomas Hertel Purdue University Presentation at the GEOSHARE Workshop, Purdue University Wednesday, September 10, 2014.

coby-anthony
Download Presentation

Presented by Thomas Hertel Purdue University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Geospatial, Open-Source Hosting of Agriculture, Resources and Environmental DataPilot Project Overview & Lessons Learned Presented by Thomas Hertel Purdue University Presentation at the GEOSHARE Workshop, Purdue University Wednesday, September 10, 2014

  2. Origins of GEOSHARE: UK Foresight Project • Sir John Beddington, UK Chief Scientist, initiated a project on “The Future of Sustainable Farming” • Modeling teams spent 95% of their time building geospatial data to underpin analyses, leaving: • Very little time and resources for modeling and analysis • Results which were fundamentally non-comparable • Precipitated a UK-funded White Paper (Hertel, Villoria et al., 2010) documenting the limitations of existing time series geospatial data for analyses of food and environment security and proposing GEOSHARE

  3. Origins of GEOSHARE: Pilot Project • The 2010 White Paper concluded that, despite the many geospatial efforts underway at the time, there we critical limitations holding back discovery and decision making. In particular, most such data sets: • Are regional or national, not global; yet some of the most pressing problems are global in scope • The global (and many regional) data sets are one-off & incompatible: causes problems of inconsistency; nearly impossible to resolve at end of data pipeline; compatibility must be designed at outset • Present high barriers to entry for those outside the geospatial sciences • As a result, UK-DFID, DEFRA and USDA stepped forward to fund a pilot project aimed at demonstrating ‘proof of concept’ which ran from 2012-2014

  4. Origins of GEOSHARE: Pilot Project • Pilot project had several key elements: • Data base: begin building interoperable data base for land cover, land use and irrigation for Ghana and India • Develop several ‘case studies’ to illustrate the usefulness of these data • Review the available cyber-infrastructure for facilitating collaboration • Develop a proposal for the design of an institution which could sustain GEOSHARE over the long run and review the stakeholder landscape

  5. GEOSHARE as a Collection of Nodes – Pilot Project funded activities Navin Ramankutty U. British Columbia AgMIP Community: Delphine Deryng Technical lead at Purdue: Carol Song

  6. Origins of GEOSHARE: Pilot Project • Pilot project had several key elements: • Data base: begin building interoperable data base for land cover, land use and irrigation for Ghana and India • Develop several ‘case studies’ to illustrate the usefulness of these data • Review the available cyber-infrastructure for facilitating collaboration • Develop a proposal for the design of an institution which could sustain GEOSHARE over the long run and review the stakeholder landscape • Extension of the pilot to encompass HUBZero • Initial pilot did not include funds for development of cyber-infrastructure • However, it became clear that development of workflows were key to engaging scientists and decision makers • ILSI Research Foundation stepped forward to fund the development of several such workflows over the past year (along with support from ITAP)

  7. Workflows on GEOSHARE HUB Data Data Reconciliation SPAM; Data Fusion • Gridded source data on land cover & use, water, poverty and environment - flows into: • Data reconciliation ‘models’, e.g. SPAM which produce usable data - for use in • Biophysical and economic models (e.g., DSSAT, IMPACT, SIMPLE, GTAP) Sensitivity of results at final stage determines value of improving quality of source data Source Data Land Cover Land Use Water Poverty Environment IMPACT DSSAT

  8. What have we learned? • Incentives are key: Not just a matter of $$ • Centralized funding of decentralized activities is unworkable! • Cyber-infrastructure facilitates collaboration and dissemination; incentives are again key • Must link to user communities • Core activities must have stable, L-T support • Success will require achieving critical mass

  9. Agenda Overview • Why GEOSHARE? Case studies illustrating the importance of consistent, time series geospatial data on agr, environ and poverty • HUBZero in action: Connecting communities and synthesizing data • Institutional design of GEOSHARE • What role for data endorsement? • The future of data fusion

More Related