1 / 5

Musa L. Audu, PhD; Steven J. Gartman, MS; Raviraj Nataraj, PhD; Ronald J. Triolo, PhD

Posture-dependent control of stimulation in standing neuroprosthesis: Simulation feasibility study. Musa L. Audu, PhD; Steven J. Gartman, MS; Raviraj Nataraj, PhD; Ronald J. Triolo, PhD. Aim

cmickel
Download Presentation

Musa L. Audu, PhD; Steven J. Gartman, MS; Raviraj Nataraj, PhD; Ronald J. Triolo, PhD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Posture-dependent control of stimulation in standing neuroprosthesis: Simulation feasibility study Musa L. Audu, PhD; Steven J. Gartman, MS; Raviraj Nataraj, PhD; Ronald J. Triolo, PhD

  2. Aim • Use 3D biomechanical model of human standing to test feasibility of feed-forward control systems that vary stimulation to paralyzed muscles based on user’s posture and desire to effect postural change. • Relevance • Motor system neuroprostheses using functional neuromuscular stimulation can improve overall health and functional independence of individuals with paralysis from spinal cord injury.

  3. Method • Controllers examined were— • Constant baseline stimulation: • Represented muscle activation required to maintain erect standing. • Posture follower: • Varied muscle activation as function of location of projection of whole-body center of mass on base of support.

  4. Results • Posture-dependent control of stimulation demonstrated significant benefits over open-loop stimulation. • Compared with using upper-limb effort alone, both controllers result in >50% reduction in effort.

  5. Conclusion • Control systems that facilitate user-driven, task-dependent postures can be more effective and efficient than conventional open-loop stimulation. • Obviate need for complicated posture-setting devices such as switches and joysticks. • Functional implications include potential to expand reachable workspace and better preparation for anticipated disturbances that could challenge balance over existing neuroprostheses for standing.

More Related