slide1 l.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Analysis of the Gettysburg Address PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Analysis of the Gettysburg Address

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 13

Analysis of the Gettysburg Address - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

An analysis of the presentation style used by Abraham Lincoln in his famous speech at Gettysburg during the American civil war.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Analysis of the Gettysburg Address' - cmi_managers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

The Gettysburg Address

Deconstructing Lincoln’s 269 words


Four score and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth upon this continent a new nation: conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

This is setting the scene with a precise statement of the historical context. The use of the biblical style four score and seven, echoing three score years and tenin Psalm 90, sets a momentous tone.

Then the words conceived and created are used, reversing the usage so that the nation is conceived whereas all men are created.

Logically, nations are created and men are conceived.


Now we are engaged in a great civil war. . . testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated. . . can long endure.

He reiterates the word conceived to link back to the previous sentence, emphasising the unique origins of the nation.


We are met on a great battlefield of that war.

Bringing the audience back to the here-and-now.


We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

Establishing the reason for the occasion and the rationale behind it.


But, in a larger sense,

    • we cannot dedicate. . .
    • we cannot consecrate. . .
    • we cannot hallow this ground

He challenges their right to do this by questioning their right to honour so great a sacrifice.

He uses the Rule of Three for emphasis and uses semi-religious words in each line: dedicate, consecrate, and hallow.


The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract.

He again echoes the powerful word consecrate with its religious connotations, and positions those present as being humbled, by using the phrase far above our poor power.


The world will little note, nor long remember, what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here.

  • He uses the contrasting verbs:
  • Remember - Forget
      • Say - Do
  • As a further twist, he also contrasts tenses:
  • Present tense:
  • remember what we say
  • Past tense
  • forget what they did

It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced.

Now he contrasts the people who are being honoured with the role of the living; using the word dedicated to refer to the living.

This is again a semi-religious word and echoes the concept of consecration in respect of the dead.


It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us

He reiterates the concept of the living being dedicated (to the remaining task.)


1 ... that from these honoured dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion

2 ... that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain

3 ... that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom

He uses the Rule of Three to emphasise the tasks ahead for the living:

In (1) he contrasts the devotion of the dead and the devotion of the living

In (2) he emphasises this idea by talking about the dead not having died in vain,

By contrast, (3) avoids any linguistic tricks and makes a simple blunt statement but uses powerful and glorious words.


. . . and that government

      • of the people,
      • by the people,
      • for the people,
  • . . shall not perish from the earth.

And again, the Rule of Three hammers home the fundamental principle underlying the foundation of the nation, returning to biblical phraseology with the closing words: shall not perish from the earth.


The Gettysburg Address