Learning sensorimotor transformations
1 / 40

Learning sensorimotor transformations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Learning sensorimotor transformations. Maurice J. Chacron. The principle of sensory reafference:. Von Holst and Mittelstaedt, 1950. Movements can lead to sensory reafference (e.g. body movements) An efference copy and the reafferent stimulus are combined and give rise to the

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Learning sensorimotor transformations' - clive

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

The principle of sensory reafference
The principle of sensory reafference:

Von Holst

and Mittelstaedt, 1950

  • Movementscan lead to sensory reafference (e.g. body movements)

  • An efference copy and the reafferent stimulus are combined and give rise to the

    perceived stimulus.

  • Question: how is the efference copy combined with the reafferent stimulus to give rise to the perceived stimulus?

Mechanical tickling experiment
Mechanical tickling experiment:

Blakemore, Frith, and Wolpert, J. Cogn. Neurosci. (1999)

  • Motor command  arm movement

  • Reafference  tactile stimulus

  • Perceived stimulus  tickling sensation

Wolpert and

Flanagan, 2001

  • The predicted sensory stimulus(efference copy)is compared to the actual stimulus

  • If there is a discrepancy, then the subject perceives the stimulus as causing a tickling sensation.

  • The efference copycontainsboth temporal and spatial information about the reafferent stimulus.

Motor learning
Motor learning:

Martin et al. 1996

  • Sensorimotor coordinationdoes not require the cerebellum.

  • Adaptation to novel conditionsdoes require cerebellar function.

  • Adaptation is an error driven process.

Weakly electric fish
Weakly electric Fish expected stimuli?

  • Electric fish emit electric fields through

    an electric organ in their tail.

Anatomy expected stimuli?


Electric Fish

  • The expected stimuli? cerebellum of electric fish is very developed.

  • Cerebellar anatomy is conserved across vertebrates.

  • Electric fish have “simple” anatomy and behaviors.

  • Electric fish are a good model system to study cancellation of reafferent input.

Electrolocation expected stimuli?

  • Electric fish expected stimuli? useperturbations of their self-generated electric field to interact with their environment.

  • Pulses generated by the animal can activate their own electrosensory system.

  • Are there mechanisms by which sensory neurons can “ignore” these reafferent stimuli?

Cerebellar like anatomy
Cerebellar-like anatomy: expected stimuli?

Bell, 2001

Bell, 2001 expected stimuli?

  • Changes expected stimuli? in the reafferent stimulus

    causechanges in the efference copy

  • What mechanisms underlie these changes?

Plasticity experiment
Plasticity experiment: expected stimuli?

granule cell

Parallel fiber

sensory input

Anti hebbian stdp
Anti-Hebbian STDP: expected stimuli?



How? expected stimuli?

Cerebellar like anatomy1
Cerebellar-like anatomy expected stimuli?

Anatomy expected stimuli?

Burst firing in pyramidal cells
Burst firing in pyramidal cells expected stimuli?

Burst-timing dependent plasticity

Model assumptions how to carve out a negative image
Model Assumptions: How to “carve out” a negative image expected stimuli?

  • A subset of cerebellar granule cells fires at

    every phase of the stimulus

  • Probability to fire a burst is largest/smallest

    at a local stimulus maximum/minimum

  • Weights from synapses near the local maximum/

    minimum will be most/least depressed

Graphically… expected stimuli?

Synaptic weights

Most depression

Least depression




Phase (rad)

Extra assumptions
Extra assumptions expected stimuli?

  • Non-associative potentiation (in order to prevent the weights from going to zero).

Does the model work
Does the model work? expected stimuli?

Summary stimulus

  • Sensorimotor transformations require learning.

  • This learning must be adaptive (e.g. adapt to changes during development, etc…)

  • Anti-Hebbian plasticity provides a mechanism for adaptive cancellation of reafferent stimuli