160 likes | 174 Views
This study examines the evolving styles of human resource planning in healthcare from traditional to performance-driven approaches to achieve workforce optimization. It delves into workforce projection models, emphasizing the right people with the right skills, attitudes, and motivation, at the right time and cost. It explores the complexities of workforce dynamics and the challenges in achieving the ideal workforce concept. Through a conceptual model, it links health needs, care provision, and the health workforce planning process by analyzing current and future staff requirements based on population growth, available finance, staff utilization, and organizational efficiency.
E N D
KEELE UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT EXPLORING THE USE OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH PROJECTION MODEL Peter Hornby
KEELE UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Changing Style Of Human Resource Planning Traditional H.R. Planning Staff roles and functions changing little, little attention to costs or efficiency Finance Limited H.R. Planning Staff numbers and mix determined or limited by finance Performance Driven H.R. Planning Staffing driven not simply by finance limits but also by demands for efficient use of resources
Purpose of Manpower- Human Resource – Work Force Planning • Right number of people • In the right place • with the right skills • at the right time • Right number of people • In the right place • with the right skills • at the right time • with the right attitudes • and motivation • Right number of people • In the right place • with the right skills • at the right time • with the right attitudes • and motivation • at the right cost • Right number of people • In the right place • with the right skills • at the right time • with the right attitudes • and motivation • at the right cost • doing the right work KEELE UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT To Achieve and Sustain : 1960’s Concept 1970’s Concept 1980’s Concept 1990’s Concept
KEELE UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT The ideal for the workforce (2000s concept), in human resource terms, is to have: The right number of people, With the right skills, In the right place, At the right time, With right attitudes/ commitment, Doing the right work, At the right cost, With theright productivity. This ideal is never achieved or at best minimally, because the workforce and the workforce environment is an extremely complex and dynamic system.
Classical View of Human Resource Planning Process Leavers KEELE UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Current Health Needs & Demands Existing Services Future Health Needs & Demands Future Health & Health Care Goals Current Staff Future Services Types of Staff Required Trained Staff Returning Projected Skill Mix New Graduates Total Staff Available In The Future Total Staff Needed In The Future Equal ? NO YES Change Goals, Services and/or Staff Requirements Change Type & Scale of Recruitment, Losses Affordable ? NO YES Implement Plan
KEELE UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT The Variables Impacting on Future Staff Requirements SERVICES POPULATION GROWTH AND CHANGE AVAILABLE FINANCE TECHNOLOGY CHANGE PUBLIC EXPECTATIONS STAFF REQUIREMENTS HEALTH PROBLEMS STAFF UTILISATION QUALITY STANDARDS SKILL MIX ORGANISATIONAL EFFICIENCY INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE
KEELE UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Conceptual Model - Linking Health Needs, Care Provision & the Health Workforce. FIRST STAGE --- Determine Current Situation Current Demographic & Epidemiology patterns Current Health Needs and Demands Current Public Health Services Provided Current Socio- Economic Status of the population Health Services Current Share of National GNP Current Service & HR Policies Current Public Sector Workforce Mix Current Size of the Private Health Sector Current Workforce Cost Creates foundation for second stage
KEELE UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Conceptual Model - Linking Health Needs, Care Provision & the Health Workforce. FIRST STAGE --- Determine Current Situation Current Health Needs and Demands Current Demographic & Epidemiology patterns Current Socio- Economic Status of the population Health Services Current Share of National GNP Current Public Health Services Provided Current Service & HR Policies Current Public Sector Workforce Mix Current Size of the Private Health Sector Current Workforce Cost SECOND STAGE –Develop The Service Plan Projected Future Demographic & Epidemiology patterns Projected Changes in National GNP Proposed Future Service Policies Future Socio- Economic Status of the population Future Health Needs & Demands Proposed Future Public Health Services Expected Future Share in National GNP Private Sector Expansion Provides Basis for Determining Future Workforce Requirements & Supply in Stage 3
KEELE UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Conceptual Model - Linking Health Needs, Care Provision & the Health Workforce. Current Health Needs and Demands Current Demographic & Epidemiology patterns Current Socio- Economic Status of the population Health Services Current Share of National GNP Current Public Health Services Provided Current Service & HR Policies Current Public Sector Workforce Mix Current Size of the Private Health Sector Current Workforce Cost Projected Future Demographic & Epidemiology patterns Projected Changes in National GNP Proposed Future Service Policies Future Socio- Economic Status of the population Future Health Needs & Demands Proposed Future Public Health Services Expected Future Share in National GNP Private Sector Expansion Projected Future Workforce Supply Staffing Standards/Norms & Principles Available Financing for Workforce Human Resource Policies Projected Future Workforce Requirements Future Workforce Staffing Mix
KEELE UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT • There are an array of strategic HR projection models which include: • THE WHO HRH PROJECTION MODEL (Hall) • THE KEELE ZONAL HRH MODEL (Hornby) • THE SMALL STATE/DISTRICT HRH MODEL (Dewdney) • HEALTH SERVICE RESOURCE MODEL (UNDP in process) • INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE TECHNOLOGY PACKAGE • (IHTP) WHO • SERVICE TARGETS/REPROFILING MODEL (FOR UK) The model software actually incorporates three different projection models;a ratio method model which is now rarely used, a service targets model for which few developing countries have the necessary data and which has been largely superceded by more sophisticated versions and a variant on the target method called the locations method based on institutional development. It is this method that is widely used in developing country situations The Keele model was developed to link electronically to the WHO model and provide a more detailed breakdown of staff requirements (note: maybe 400-500 job titles) and more local (district) strategic projections. It proved too cumbersome for districts but reasonable at zonal or regional level with grouped districts
KEELE UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Flexibility of WHO model inputs • Models use individualized inputs regarding … • Duration of projection (any number of years) • Occupational categories used (up to 20 possible) • Training intake and loss assumptions • Post-graduation workforce loss assumptions including migration • Geographic distribution variables (urban/rural) • Economic, budget and demographic variables for age and gender • Up to 7 types each of hospitals and ambulatory facilities in both public and private sectors • Staff in non-clinical settings • Staffing norms for different types of facilities • All input/output tables electronically linked • providing easy production of alternate scenarios
KEELE UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Model Data tables (Locations method) Data not Required (automatic) Data Required Topic Yes DEMOGRAPHIC ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS 1 Yes 2 EXISTING HEALTH WORKFORCE Yes 3 SUMMARY OF KEY PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS Yes 4 PUBLIC SECTOR INCOME ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS Yes 5 ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY TEST Yes 5a ECONO MIC FEASIBILITY TEST, PRIVATE SECTOR Yes 9 HOSPITAL REQUIREMENTS BY LOCATIONS METHOD No 11 BASE YEAR & TARGET YEAR HOSPITAL STAFFING NORMS Yes 9a PRIVATE HOSPITAL REQUIREMENTS BY LOCATIONS METHOD Yes 11a BASE YEAR & TARGET YEAR PRIVATE HOSPITAL ST AFFING NORMS Yes 10 AMBULATORY FACILITIES BY THE LOCATIONS METHOD Yes 12 BASE YEAR & TARGET YEAR CLINIC STAFFING NORMS Yes 10a PRIVATE AMBULATORY FACILITIES BY THE LOCATIONS METHOD Yes 13 BASE YEAR & TARGET YEAR PRIVATE CLINIC STAFFING NORMS Ye s 14 OTHER STAFF BY LOCATIONS METHOD Yes 15 PROJECTION OF PRIVATE SECTOR STAFF AND SERVICES Yes 16 SUMMARY REQUIREMENTS BY LOCATIONS METHOD Yes 6 PROJECTED SUPPLY BASED ON TRAINING ASSUMPTIONS 6a CALCULATING CHANGES BETWEEN BASE AND TARGET YE ARS No Yes 7 STUDENT ENROLMENT AND INSTRUCTOR ASSUMPTIONS No 17 SUPPLY - REQUIREMENTS COMPARISON BY LOCATIONS METHOD No 18 ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF LOCATIONS METHOD PROJECTION No SUMMARY OF KEY DATA BY LOCATIONS METHOD 19 No 20 SUMMARY OF KE Y DATA IN ALTERNATE LANGUAGE Yes 8 TEN - YEAR PROJECTION BY STOCK AND FLOW METHOD
KEELE UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Major model outputs • HR requirements and supply projections • Urban/ rural distribution of staff & services • Number, size and staffing of all health sector facilities • Test of economic feasibility for public sector staff and staff production feasibility for all health sector • Intermediate year interpolation projections • Summary statement of key indices of • change sufficient to produce HRH plan document
KEELE UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT AVAILABLE SUPPORT FOR THE MODEL • The model itself is freely available from WHO Geneva • on the tools website • There is a very comprehensive manual but it has not been updated for new tables and is difficult to locate on the WHO website • there is a short form manual from Keele which provides guidance on how to run the model and what data is required to complete the tables. It is freely available but not routinely distributed • There is a manual from Keele which provides guidance on how to analyse and interpret input data in the model tables. It is freely available but not routinely distributed
KEELE UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Modelling and the Modelling process • Issues: - participants in the projection makingprocess lose track of the relationship between tables - the meaning of the numbers in the tables is often not understood among non-planners - the connection between health, HRH policy and growth proposals is only weakly made and applied in the model - there is frequently poor information on leavers - the estimates of staff costs is often very difficult to establish because of multiple funding sources - participants unused to visioning - original help tables now out of date and new types of help data required - the need for multiple iterations in the projection process is generally not recognised • - difficult to find and maintain technical know-how • within ministry – need external(in country) support
KEELE UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Fitting modelling into the Planning Process • Issues: • Operational environment becoming complicated with devolution of responsibilities in health sector reform. • Data collection, processing & analysis difficult and time consuming. • Service planning is sometimes not in place, sometimes mechanical or political & is always time consuming with little opportunity for testing resource (HR) implications. • Little incentive for managers (although this is changing under new pressures for efficiency) to meet plan objectives. • Planners not engaging with the Politics of planning • Mechanisms for implementation often not • In place.