1 / 35

Cognitive Psychology Winter 2004 -Discussion Section-

Ψ. Cognitive Psychology Winter 2004 -Discussion Section-. Perception & Imagery. Perception. Imagery. Cognitive functions. Perception. Emotion Motivation Action. Attention. Memory. Imagery. Decision-making. Reasoning, problem-solving. Language. Perception.

claus
Download Presentation

Cognitive Psychology Winter 2004 -Discussion Section-

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ψ Cognitive Psychology Winter 2004 -Discussion Section-

  2. Perception & Imagery

  3. Perception • Imagery Cognitive functions • Perception Emotion Motivation Action • Attention • Memory • Imagery • Decision-making • Reasoning, problem-solving • Language

  4. Perception Perception, Imagery, Shepard & Metzler and Review. There is no way that I can go in any detail in Perception. So let´s just review the most important principle.

  5. Perception What we perceive is NOT a exact copy of the external world, it is a selective RECONSTRUCTION. It is a MENTAL REPRESENTATION. (of aspects of the external world)

  6. Implications: 4 fundamental non-correspondences 1) Things that we perceive might not be actually present in the environment. 2) Things that are actually present in the environment might not be perceived (see: Attention examples of last time). 3) Changes in the environment might not result in changes in perception. 4) Changes in perception might not result from changes in the environment.

  7. Perception 4) Shepards tables 1) Kanisza triangle

  8. Perception 4) Motion-induced blindness http://www.keck.ucsf.edu/~yoram/mib.html

  9. Perception 3) Color-constancy

  10. I time Perception Fundamental Reason 1: Duham-Quine Paradox

  11. Perception Reason: Limited Sampling. Inference with limited information.  „Aliasing“. Needs assumptions to disambiguate. 0 10 0 7 6 1 9 0 0 10 0 7 6 1 9 0

  12. Perception 1 Physical Stimulus  2 Filter1 (Static)  3 Filter2 (Variable)  4 Filter3 (Variable)  5 Mental representation  6 Filter4  7 Mental representation  8 Filter5  9 Action. • e.g. Light • e.g. Photoreceptors • e.g. Eye movements • ATTENTION! • Commonly refered to as PERCEPTION! • ATTENTION! • MEMORY! • Action selection • e.g. Catching a ball

  13. Perception On the other hand, this allows us to study the assumptions, the PROCESSING by looking at illusions and how people perceive them.

  14. Perception A huge brain machinery is devoted to process visual information alone. 30% of the brain. At least. Together with other perceptual information: Easily 50%. To allow us to act efficiently on impoverished input.

  15. Imagery Some demos...

  16. The Problems: • Too subjective, idiosyncratic • Too introspective • Too qualitative

  17. High stakes... Stephen Kosslyn, John Lindsley Professor of Psychology at Harvard University

  18. Mental scanning Kosslyn, Ball & Reiser (JExP, 1978)

  19. Stephen Kosslyn • Zenon Pylyshyn „Yes!“ „No!“ The imagery debate(s) „Do mental representations of images retain the depictive properties of the image itself?“

  20. The propositional perspective Pylyshyn: !?

  21. „Spatial equivalence“ • „Perceptual equivalence“ • „Transformational equivalence“ The arguments Mental images represented by relations between symbols (language-like) Mental images represented in analogous form (vision-like) • Distortions by labels, heuristics • Demand characteristics • Computer metaphor • Moot point 1: Anderson (PsycRev,1978): RT not diagnostic due to Representation/Process tradeoffs, emulating both. • Moot point 2: Representation = Process. Need to look at neurophysiology for the CODE.

  22. Resolution 1 - Paradigm „Visual mental imagery activates the same areas as visual perception“ (Kosslyn, et al., JCogNeuro, 1993)

  23. Resolution 1 – Paradigm „Visual mental imagery activates the same areas as visual perception“ (Kosslyn et al., JCogNeuro, 1993)

  24. Resolution 2 „Visual mental imagery activates many visual areas, INCLUDING V1“ (Kosslyn et al., Nature 1995; Kosslyn et al., Science 1999)

  25. Current state: • Perception: Classically bottom up: • Retina  LGN (Thalamus)  V1  V2  V4  IT  ?  …  ?  Frontal cortex • Imagery: Top down! • Basically the same systems: • Frontal cortex  ?  …  ?  IT  V4  V2  V1.

  26. Shepard The grand old man of psychology

  27. Mental rotation • Shepard & Metzler (Science, 1971)

  28. Mental rotation • Issue? The nature of mental representations? Can they be manipulated like one would expect from the laws of physics? Does the internal world follow the principles of the external world (it doesn´t have to!)

  29. Exam review • Purpose? To scare you into studying. You can´t wing it.

  30. Exam review • Ground rules: No cheating. You WILL regret it!

  31. Exam review • Format: • 6 essay questions. One from each field (Intro, Reason, Attention, Perception1, Perception2, Imagery). Do 5 of them. • 10 Multiple Choice Questions. • 1 Bonus Question.

  32. Attention: *Explains many things and nothing. A theoretical fudge factor. Equals “trophic factors”. *There are many models, all of them fail to capture essentials of the phenomenon.Prominent: Treismans Attenuation theory, Broadbents early selection theory. *Most useful to think of as a variable filter that generates mental representations for action selection. *There are processes that are automatic, others need attentional resources. They reflect a tradeoff. *Attention involved in many phenomena: Visual Search, Popout, Change blindness, etc.

  33. Perception: *Perception is the formation of a mental representation of the environment. *This representation is NOT isomorphic, but subject to many correspondence errors. *To overcome the inherent ambiguity in sensory data, the brain makes assumptions about the world. (Learnt in phylogeny, ontogeny). Like Gestalt rules. * These assumptions can be uncovered by research with visual illusions.

  34. Imagery: *Activation of a mental representation from memory. In ABSENCE of a stimulus. *Paradigmatic case of TOP-DOWN processing. *Debate between Pylyshyn and Kosslyn whether mental representation in imagery analog or propositional. (Since 30+ years!) *Most brain areas active in perception are also active in imagery.

  35. Reasoning: * There are two ways of reasoning, deductive (Rule  Particular instance) and inductive reasoning (Data  Rule). They both have advantages and disadvantages. * People are subject to many biases in reasoning, most particularly the confirmation bias, which usually affects them in hypothesis testing. (Elicited by Wason selection task). Also common: Baserate neglect. * People should try to falsify, not to verify their hypotheses.

More Related