1 / 20

Strategic Priorities Consultation Survey Overview

Strategic Priorities Consultation Survey Overview. Strategic Priorities Advisory Committee November 6, 2013. Introduction Survey #1 Respondent overview Priority Selection Analysis Considerations Survey #2 Preliminary Results. Agenda. Survey 1. Oct. 15 – Oct. 23.

claudia-fitzpatrick
Download Presentation

Strategic Priorities Consultation Survey Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Strategic Priorities Consultation Survey Overview Strategic Priorities Advisory Committee November 6, 2013

  2. Introduction • Survey #1 • Respondent overview • Priority Selection • Analysis • Considerations • Survey #2 • Preliminary Results Agenda

  3. Survey 1 Oct. 15 – Oct. 23

  4. 1700 total respondents 710 56 201 Yrs w/TRU Respondent Overview N/A 381 >10 6-10 183 135 3-5 215 1-2 166 <1 127 127 110 78 59 233 48 44 53 23 26 85 35 35 21

  5. 1700 total respondents Other Admin 1% 5% Community 7% Respondent Overview Staff 10% Student 42% Faculty 13% Alumni 22% Sig. under-rep Sig. over-rep

  6. Overall Priority Selection

  7. We would expect the breakdown by respondent group to be reflected in each priority. • This was the case in the following priorities (top 7 are highlighted): • Student Engagement • Innovative and Accessible Academic Programming • Learning and Teaching Innovation • Life-long Learning • Research, Scholarly, and Creative Capacity • Research-Informed Education Consistency Across Groups: 6 of 13 Top 7 priority

  8. We would expect the breakdown by respondent group to be reflected in each priority. • This was not the case in the following priorities (top 7 are highlighted): • Flexible Course and Program Delivery • Partnerships with Educational Institutions, Communities, and the Private Sector • Professional Development • Community-Relevant Research • Aboriginal, Local, and Global Understanding • Innovation and Entrepreneurship • School Pride Based on Academic and Athletic Excellence Inconsistency Across Groups: 7 of 13 Top 7 priority

  9. Partnerships Flexible Course & Program Delivery Inconsistent Selection Rates Professional Development Statistically Sig.

  10. Most groups picked the same top 7 priorities, with some exceptions. The Bottom Line

  11. 13% of total respondents (215) • 67% have been affiliated with TRU for more than 6 years A Closer Look at the Faculty Response Group • Unique perspective • Less frequent priorities • Flexible Course & Program Delivery • Partnerships • More frequent priorities • Research, Scholarly & Creative Capacity • Aboriginal, Local, Global Understanding A possible area to keep in mind for town halls

  12. 42% of total respondents (710) • 33% have been affiliated with TRU for less than 1 year A Closer Look at the Student Response Group • For consideration: students did not rate “Student Engagement” as one of the highest priorities; • However, we know from other sources (like NSSE and the CUR) that students value the components of student engagement

  13. 788 additional priorities were suggested in the comment boxes (460 respondents) • Grouped into overall themes, including: • Course and program expansion and development • Experiential learning • Affordable education • Grouped into original priorities where appropriate Other Suggested Priorities: Comment Boxes

  14. Counts of All Priorities None of the comment box themes were mentioned frequently enough to change the top 7 priority.

  15. Questions about Survey 1?

  16. Survey 2- Preliminary Results Oct. 28 – Nov. 4

  17. Preliminary 1110 total respondents 515 Respondent Overview N/A >10 yrs 6-10 yrs 194 182 3-5 yrs 1-2 yrs 101 <1 75 188 31 12

  18. Preliminary 1110 total respondents Other Admin 1% 7% Community 3% Respondent Overview Staff 9% Student 46% Faculty 16% Alumni 18%

  19. Overall Priority Ranking Preliminary Descriptive Statistical Flexible Course & Program Delivery Innovative and Accessible Academic Programming Learning and Teaching Innovations Student Engagement Partnerships with Educational Institutions, Communities, and the Private Sector Professional Development Life-long Learning 1st Group 2nd Group 1st 3rd Group 4th Group

  20. Questions about Survey 2?

More Related