1 / 13

Case Kuninkaantie upper secondary school, swimming pool and games hall

Case Kuninkaantie upper secondary school, swimming pool and games hall. NCC Construction Ltd Matti Aho Profit Unit Director. NCC’s BOT projects. Arlanda rail link, Sweden SEK 5 billion Motorway A2, Poland SEK 2.7 billion District heating plant, Skurup, Sweden SEK 40 million

clark-jennings
Download Presentation

Case Kuninkaantie upper secondary school, swimming pool and games hall

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Case Kuninkaantieupper secondary school, swimming pool and games hall NCC Construction Ltd Matti Aho Profit Unit Director

  2. NCC’s BOT projects • Arlanda rail link, SwedenSEK 5 billion • Motorway A2, PolandSEK 2.7 billion • District heating plant, Skurup, SwedenSEK 40 million • Kallax airport, Swedenshareholder • Kuninkaantie upper secondary school, games hall and swimming pool

  3. Kuninkaantie upper secondary school The first public-private partnership project in Finland. Espoo: • purchases maintenance and user services from the project companies • pays only for the services produced • partnership model 28 years, service contract 25 years • the goal is to pass the optimal number of risks associated with the project from the city to the private service providers Service production began in autumn 2003.

  4. NCC Construction Finland Ltd • NCC’s role • leading the project team • optimising life-cycle costs (LCC) • environmental life-cycle assessment (LCA) • construction • fittings, educational equipment • maintenance

  5. ABB OyBuilding services and facilities management turnkey supplier of services and systems related to building services throughout the building’s life cycle ABB’s facilities management guarantee high-quality building maintenance and facilities services that are efficient in terms of total costs

  6. Sodexho’s services high-quality restaurant services for the pupils, staff and outsiders lobby services in the main lobby swimming pool lobby and café services lifeguard’s services opening and locking the games hall’s doors attendant services sanitation services

  7. Services at Kuninkaantie upper secondary school OTHER SERVICES • restaurant services • attendant and mailing services • fittings and educational equipment • ICT services • swimming pool and games hall operating services • external sources of income • general emergencies BUILDING MAINTENANCE • tending and maintaining the grounds • cleaning and waste disposal • security services • managerial and building management services • repair and maintenance of buildings

  8. Agreements for Kuninkaantie upper secondary school Land-lease agreement Agreement on purchase option City of Espoo Finance company ABB Credit Oy Lease agreement/ payment of rent Service agreement Contract agreements Construction commission agreement Shareholderagreement Contractors NCC ja ABB Project company ARANDUR Oy Shareholders NCC Finland Oy Sodexho Oy ABB Oy Subsupplier agreements Subcontractors Subsuppliers NCC, Sodexho, ABB, Fujitsu Invia, Elisa Communications

  9. Private finance in public projects New construction projects FINANCIAL BACKET NCC FINLAND OY, ABB OY PROJECT COMPANY Arandur Design Procurement Contracting Operating liability Delivery Commission EUR SERVICE CHARGE 1 / VARIABLE SERVICE CHARGE SERVICE CHARGE 2 / FIXED SERVICE CHARGE 2003 2028 2000 Construction-period finance The client approves the perfomance and the lease period begins

  10. Risk-sharing in Kuninkaantie upper secondary school Espoo • inflation • customers; the pupils • changes in legislation • force majeure • official charges; land-lease, municipal taxation, etc • functional renovations Project company • technical condition; maintenance and renovations • quality and quantity of services; sanctions • quantities consumed • economic cycles • availability

  11. Use of eco-assessment calculation in choice of materials Steel pools (Swedish Invarmex) Econet-LTO system (efficiency, moisture control) Heat recovery for shower water Kitchen machinery – energy aspect Advanced waste sorting and recycling Integrated ticket sales, cashier and gate system for swimming pool Real-time monitoring and running via the internet of the building automation system Solutions/ products

  12. Social benefits LTO, improved U-value for windows Lower life- cycle costs Example During 25 years comparison case Eco-assessment calculation Difference LCA 9,992 8,354 LCA -16.4% -7,371 MWh kWh/htm2 LCC 29,966 29,656 LCC -1.0% -4 MSEK SEK/htm2 INV 19,157 19,170 INV 0.1% + 0.6 MSEK SEK/htm2 Result: – insignificant increase in capital cost – substantial improvement in energy expenses – substantial decrease in environmental impacts Changes in the Kuninkaantie upper secondary school project: – better windows (u-value) – heat recovery systems

  13. Kuninkaantien lukio, liikunta- ja uimahalli Partnership with trust

More Related