1 / 11

Belinda Fehlberg Melbourne Law School

Post-separation parenting and financial settlements: the long-term financial impacts of shared care. Belinda Fehlberg Melbourne Law School. Hypothesis.

clancy
Download Presentation

Belinda Fehlberg Melbourne Law School

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Post-separation parenting and financial settlements: the long-term financial impacts of shared care Belinda Fehlberg Melbourne Law School

  2. Hypothesis Financial settlements at separation are now more likely to reflect arrangements for shared parenting time but shared care is unlikely to be sustained in the longer term, resulting a new source of financial disadvantage of children and solo carers.

  3. Aims • To test the hypothesis via repeat interviews over 3 years with parents and advisers; and • If necessary, make proposals for reform.

  4. Research questions • Shared care and financial arrangements at separation? • Shared care and financial arrangements over time? • If there’s a discrepancy between 1 and 2, does this financially disadvantage children and their carers?

  5. Background • Post-separation parenting and financial arrangements are intertwined • Residence parent likely to receive more of the parties’ property,spousal maintenance, and can claim child support • Substantial care and high contact costs can reduce liability under the CSS • Other subtle interrelationships

  6. Background (cont) • Financial arrangements have an important impact on the economic and social well-being of family members post-separation ‘[R]ecent work suggests that – besides parental conflict – it is the economic fallout from divorce that drives many of the negative consequences of divorce for children.’ (Smyth and Weston, 2001, p 1).

  7. Background (cont) • Shared care arrangements often do not last in the longer term. Longitudinal data suggest the relative fragility of shared time arrangements compared with other parenting arrangements, with the tendency over time being for children to eventually live with one parent – usually their mother Eg: • Juby, Marcil-Gratton and Le Bourdais, 2005 (Canada); • Smyth, Weston, Moloney, Richardson and Temple, 2008 (Aust)).

  8. A significant issue • More separated parents entering shared time arrangements Eg McIntosh and Long, 2007. • So likely that: • Property will be more evenly divided • Fathers’ child support liability will be reduced • Spousal maintenance may become even rarer

  9. The project • ARC Discovery Grant 2008 • 3 year study • Data from two Australian State capitals and one regional centre

  10. The project (cont) • 2 groups of parents separating on or after 1/7/08. • Group 1: equal or ‘substantial and significant’ parenting time arrangements • Group 2: ‘traditional’ parenting arrangements • ‘Case study’ approach (100 couples) • Sampling • Interviews

  11. Contribution • First study of the relationship between parenting and financial arrangements • Discouraging ‘silo’ thinking in family law • Benefit to children and their carers

More Related